中华预防医学杂志
中華預防醫學雜誌
중화예방의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF
2012年
3期
237-240
,共4页
张培培%曹望楠%孙昕霙%沙铭露%岳芳%常春
張培培%曹望楠%孫昕霙%沙銘露%嶽芳%常春
장배배%조망남%손흔영%사명로%악방%상춘
健康素养%传染病控制%健康行为%问卷调查
健康素養%傳染病控製%健康行為%問捲調查
건강소양%전염병공제%건강행위%문권조사
Health literacy%Communicable disease control%Health behavior%Questionnaires
目的 评测北京市丰台区公众的呼吸道传染病相关健康素养,分析其影响因素,探索其与健康行为的关系.方法 2011年6月在北京市丰台区采用多阶段抽样的方法确定1100名研究对象,对其采用自行设计的问卷进行调查,内容包括社会人口学特征、健康素养测评和健康行为测评3部分.应用SPSS 13.0软件,对调查结果进行统计学描述,应用方差或协方差分析对健康素养的影响因素及其与健康行为的关系进行分析.结果 收回有效问卷998份,有效应答率为90.7％.调查对象的年龄范围为15 ～65岁,其呼吸道传染病相关健康素养(以下简称健康素养)得分为(71.3±19.0)分.低(＜60分)、中(60～85分)、高健康素养者(＞85分)所占比例分别为25.7％( 256/998)、43.2％(432/998)和31.1％ (310/998).户籍人口、非户籍人口的健康素养得分分别为(74.1±18.9)、(68.4±18.8)分,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).健康素养各题型正确率从高到低依次为视听(77.6％,4647/5988)、网络操作(75.2％,2251/2994)、阅读(74.6％,3724/4990)、识图(68.3％,4090/5988)、计算(65.5％,5230/7984).经方差分析或协方差分析发现,不同年龄、民族、文化程度、职业、收入水平人群健康素养的差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01),不同性别、婚姻状况人群健康素养的差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).调查对象的呼吸道传染病相关健康行为得分为(69.7±15.5)分.低、中、高健康素养者行为得分依次升高,分别为(64.5±15.0)、(70.4±15.6)、(72.5±14.9)分,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论 北京市丰台区公众具备一定的呼吸道传染病相关健康素养,年龄、民族、文化程度、职业和收入是健康素养水平的影响因素,健康素养水平高的人群其健康行为水平也相应较高.
目的 評測北京市豐檯區公衆的呼吸道傳染病相關健康素養,分析其影響因素,探索其與健康行為的關繫.方法 2011年6月在北京市豐檯區採用多階段抽樣的方法確定1100名研究對象,對其採用自行設計的問捲進行調查,內容包括社會人口學特徵、健康素養測評和健康行為測評3部分.應用SPSS 13.0軟件,對調查結果進行統計學描述,應用方差或協方差分析對健康素養的影響因素及其與健康行為的關繫進行分析.結果 收迴有效問捲998份,有效應答率為90.7％.調查對象的年齡範圍為15 ～65歲,其呼吸道傳染病相關健康素養(以下簡稱健康素養)得分為(71.3±19.0)分.低(＜60分)、中(60～85分)、高健康素養者(＞85分)所佔比例分彆為25.7％( 256/998)、43.2％(432/998)和31.1％ (310/998).戶籍人口、非戶籍人口的健康素養得分分彆為(74.1±18.9)、(68.4±18.8)分,差異有統計學意義(P＜0.01).健康素養各題型正確率從高到低依次為視聽(77.6％,4647/5988)、網絡操作(75.2％,2251/2994)、閱讀(74.6％,3724/4990)、識圖(68.3％,4090/5988)、計算(65.5％,5230/7984).經方差分析或協方差分析髮現,不同年齡、民族、文化程度、職業、收入水平人群健康素養的差異有統計學意義(P＜0.01),不同性彆、婚姻狀況人群健康素養的差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05).調查對象的呼吸道傳染病相關健康行為得分為(69.7±15.5)分.低、中、高健康素養者行為得分依次升高,分彆為(64.5±15.0)、(70.4±15.6)、(72.5±14.9)分,差異有統計學意義(P＜0.01).結論 北京市豐檯區公衆具備一定的呼吸道傳染病相關健康素養,年齡、民族、文化程度、職業和收入是健康素養水平的影響因素,健康素養水平高的人群其健康行為水平也相應較高.
목적 평측북경시봉태구공음적호흡도전염병상관건강소양,분석기영향인소,탐색기여건강행위적관계.방법 2011년6월재북경시봉태구채용다계단추양적방법학정1100명연구대상,대기채용자행설계적문권진행조사,내용포괄사회인구학특정、건강소양측평화건강행위측평3부분.응용SPSS 13.0연건,대조사결과진행통계학묘술,응용방차혹협방차분석대건강소양적영향인소급기여건강행위적관계진행분석.결과 수회유효문권998빈,유효응답솔위90.7％.조사대상적년령범위위15 ～65세,기호흡도전염병상관건강소양(이하간칭건강소양)득분위(71.3±19.0)분.저(＜60분)、중(60～85분)、고건강소양자(＞85분)소점비례분별위25.7％( 256/998)、43.2％(432/998)화31.1％ (310/998).호적인구、비호적인구적건강소양득분분별위(74.1±18.9)、(68.4±18.8)분,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01).건강소양각제형정학솔종고도저의차위시은(77.6％,4647/5988)、망락조작(75.2％,2251/2994)、열독(74.6％,3724/4990)、식도(68.3％,4090/5988)、계산(65.5％,5230/7984).경방차분석혹협방차분석발현,불동년령、민족、문화정도、직업、수입수평인군건강소양적차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01),불동성별、혼인상황인군건강소양적차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05).조사대상적호흡도전염병상관건강행위득분위(69.7±15.5)분.저、중、고건강소양자행위득분의차승고,분별위(64.5±15.0)、(70.4±15.6)、(72.5±14.9)분,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01).결론 북경시봉태구공음구비일정적호흡도전염병상관건강소양,년령、민족、문화정도、직업화수입시건강소양수평적영향인소,건강소양수평고적인군기건강행위수평야상응교고.
Objective This study aims to survey respiratory infectious disease related health literacy (RIDHL) and health behavior (RIDHB) among residents in Fengtai district,Beijing,analyze impact factors of RIDHL,explore the association between RIDHL and RIDHB.Methods Multistage sampling was employed and 1100 respondents were surveyed by self-designed questionnaires, which including social-demographic characteristics and evaluation of RIDHL and RIDHB.The survey results were discribed,the impact factors of RIDHL and the association between RIDHL and RIDHB were analyzed by analysis of variance or covariance.Results A total of 998 qualified questionnaires were recollected with the effective rate of 90.7％.The respondents aged from 15 to 65,scored (71.3 ± 19.0) points in RIDHL test.Of those respondents,25.7％ (256/998),43.2％ (432/998) and 31.1％ (310/998) were evaluated as low( ＜60points),medium (60 -85 points),and high level( ＞ 85 points) of RIDHL,respectively.There were significant difference in RIDHL scores between registered and non-registered residents,who scored (74.1 ±18.9) and (68.4 ± 18.8 ) points,respectively ( P ＜ 0.01 ).RIDHL sections were ranked as audiovisual (77.6％,4647/5988),internet using(75.2％,2251/2994),reading(74.6％,3724/4990),map using (68.3％,4090/5988) and quantitative(65.5％,5230/7984) according to the accurate rates from high to low.Analysis of variance or covariance showed that RIDHL scores were significantly different among respondents with different ages,nationalities,educational levels,occupations,and incomes ( P ＜ 0.01 ),yet no significant differences among those with different genders and marital status( P ＞ 0.05 ).Respondents scored (69.7 ± 15.5 ) points in RIDHB test.The RIDHB scores ( (64.5 ± 15.0),( 70.4 ± 15.6),(72.5 ± 14.9)points,respectively)increased among residents with low,medium and high level of RIDHL (P ＜ 0.01 ).Conclusion Residents in Fengtai district,Beijing possessed medium level of RIDHL.The non-registered residents showed lower RIDHL than registered residents. Ages,nationalities,educational levels,occupations,and incomes were impact factors of RIDHL.People with higher level of RDHL also showed a higher level of RIDHB.
