中华创伤骨科杂志
中華創傷骨科雜誌
중화창상골과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
2009年
8期
732-737
,共6页
李健%杨健齐%张志%赵洪普%高梁斌
李健%楊健齊%張誌%趙洪普%高樑斌
리건%양건제%장지%조홍보%고량빈
胸椎%腰椎%骨折%骨折固定术,内%伤椎
胸椎%腰椎%骨摺%骨摺固定術,內%傷椎
흉추%요추%골절%골절고정술,내%상추
Thoracic vertebrae%Lumbar vertebrae%Fractures%Fracture fixation,internal%Fractured vertebra
目的 比较经伤椎椎弓根螺钉三椎体固定与传统短节段固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床疗效.方法 2004年5月至2007年6月收治胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者48例,随机分为经伤椎椎弓根螺钉三椎体固定组(治疗组24例)和传统短节段固定组(对照组24例),其中治疗组行伤椎及伤椎上下节段椎弓根内固定,对照组行传统4钉内固定.所有患者术前及术后随访均行X线及CT检查,测量并比较两组Cobb角大小、伤椎前缘压缩率、椎管占位率、椎体平移率,同时观察植骨融合及神经恢复情况.结果 所有患者获得6~18个月(平均10.6个月)随访,两组患者术后各项指标较术前均有明显改善,内固定未见松脱断裂,植骨均获得骨性愈合,无完全神经损伤较术前有1~2级恢复,术后脊髓神经功能无损伤加重等.随访时治疗组Cobb角大小、伤椎前缘压缩率较对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),显示治疗组固定更牢固,随访矫正丢失少.椎管占位率和椎体平移率治疗组疗效更好,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 经伤椎椎弓根螺钉三椎体固定法较传统方法具有更加牢固的固定效果,前中柱重建稳定,后柱固定牢固,矫正度丢失小,疗效满意,是治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的有效方法.
目的 比較經傷椎椎弓根螺釘三椎體固定與傳統短節段固定治療胸腰椎爆裂性骨摺的臨床療效.方法 2004年5月至2007年6月收治胸腰椎爆裂性骨摺患者48例,隨機分為經傷椎椎弓根螺釘三椎體固定組(治療組24例)和傳統短節段固定組(對照組24例),其中治療組行傷椎及傷椎上下節段椎弓根內固定,對照組行傳統4釘內固定.所有患者術前及術後隨訪均行X線及CT檢查,測量併比較兩組Cobb角大小、傷椎前緣壓縮率、椎管佔位率、椎體平移率,同時觀察植骨融閤及神經恢複情況.結果 所有患者穫得6~18箇月(平均10.6箇月)隨訪,兩組患者術後各項指標較術前均有明顯改善,內固定未見鬆脫斷裂,植骨均穫得骨性愈閤,無完全神經損傷較術前有1~2級恢複,術後脊髓神經功能無損傷加重等.隨訪時治療組Cobb角大小、傷椎前緣壓縮率較對照組差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),顯示治療組固定更牢固,隨訪矯正丟失少.椎管佔位率和椎體平移率治療組療效更好,但差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 經傷椎椎弓根螺釘三椎體固定法較傳統方法具有更加牢固的固定效果,前中柱重建穩定,後柱固定牢固,矯正度丟失小,療效滿意,是治療胸腰椎爆裂性骨摺的有效方法.
목적 비교경상추추궁근라정삼추체고정여전통단절단고정치료흉요추폭렬성골절적림상료효.방법 2004년5월지2007년6월수치흉요추폭렬성골절환자48례,수궤분위경상추추궁근라정삼추체고정조(치료조24례)화전통단절단고정조(대조조24례),기중치료조행상추급상추상하절단추궁근내고정,대조조행전통4정내고정.소유환자술전급술후수방균행X선급CT검사,측량병비교량조Cobb각대소、상추전연압축솔、추관점위솔、추체평이솔,동시관찰식골융합급신경회복정황.결과 소유환자획득6~18개월(평균10.6개월)수방,량조환자술후각항지표교술전균유명현개선,내고정미견송탈단렬,식골균획득골성유합,무완전신경손상교술전유1~2급회복,술후척수신경공능무손상가중등.수방시치료조Cobb각대소、상추전연압축솔교대조조차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),현시치료조고정경뢰고,수방교정주실소.추관점위솔화추체평이솔치료조료효경호,단차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 경상추추궁근라정삼추체고정법교전통방법구유경가뢰고적고정효과,전중주중건은정,후주고정뢰고,교정도주실소,료효만의,시치료흉요추폭렬성골절적유효방법.
Objective To compare the therapeutic results of transpedicular fixation through the pedicle of fractured vertebra and of the traditional transpedicular fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods Between May 2004 and June 2007,48 consecutive patients seeking medical treat-ment for one level thoracolumbar burst fracture in our department were included in this study. Their average age was 40. 1 yeas old. They were randomly and evenly assigned into an experimental group of transpedicular fixation through the pediele of fractured vertebra and a control group of traditional transpedicular fixation. All patients underwent X-ray and spiral CT scan preoperatively and postoperatively. The Cobb's angle,anterior vertebral body compression percentage (AVCP),sagittal canal diameter (SCD) and vertebral body translation percentage (VBTP) were recorded for all patients. Their fusion results and neurological functions were ob-served. Results All patients were followed up for 10.6 months averagely. The shape of injured ver-tebrae was maintained and fusion of the grafted bone was observed in all patients. All parameters were improved after operation. Follow-ups revealed that the mean Cobb's angle and AVCP in the experimental group were 6.99°±6.81°and 18.60%±9.96% respectively,significantly lower than those in the con-trol group (P<0.05). The SCD and VBTP in both groups were nearly equal (P>0.05) . No com-plications were observed in either group. The preoperative incomplete neurological injuries obtained postop-erative improvement of one or two grades. Conclusion Transpedicular fixation through the pedicle of fractured vertebra is a better treatment for thoracolumbar vertebral fractures than the traditional transpedicular fixation,because its safer fixation and better stability help restore the shape of injured vertebra and reduce the Cobb's angle.