中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2012年
9期
1033-1035
,共3页
慢性心力衰竭%全责护理%康复训练%效果观察
慢性心力衰竭%全責護理%康複訓練%效果觀察
만성심력쇠갈%전책호리%강복훈련%효과관찰
Chronic heart failure%Full-responsibility nursing model%Rehabilitation exercise%Effect observation
目的 观察全责护理模式在慢性心力衰竭患者康复训练中的应用效果.方法 采用随机数字表法将86例患者随机分为观察组(n=43)和对照组(n=43);16名护士分为A、B两组,A组实行全责护理模式,B组实行责任制和功能制相结合的护理模式;观察组由A组护士负责康复训练4周,对照组由B组护士负责康复训练4周.比较两组患者人院时和出院时的射血分数(EF)、6 min步行试验的距离(6MWT)和出院时患者对康复训练知识的知晓率和满意度得分之间的差异.结果 入院时两组EF、6MWT比较,差异无统计学意义(t值分别为1.598,1.523;P均>0.05).出院时观察组EF (54.13±9.12)、6MWT(402.63±74.81),均高于对照组EF(43.26±8.57)、6MWT(336.16±75.82),两组比较差异有统计学意义(t值分别为2.093,2.145;P均<0.05);各组EF、6MWT出院与入院时比较,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为2.681,2.010,2.791,2.185;P均<0.01).出院时两组患者满意度得分比较,差异有统计学意义(t =2.145,P<0.05).结论 全责护理模式用于慢性心力衰竭患者的康复训练中可取得显著效果.
目的 觀察全責護理模式在慢性心力衰竭患者康複訓練中的應用效果.方法 採用隨機數字錶法將86例患者隨機分為觀察組(n=43)和對照組(n=43);16名護士分為A、B兩組,A組實行全責護理模式,B組實行責任製和功能製相結閤的護理模式;觀察組由A組護士負責康複訓練4週,對照組由B組護士負責康複訓練4週.比較兩組患者人院時和齣院時的射血分數(EF)、6 min步行試驗的距離(6MWT)和齣院時患者對康複訓練知識的知曉率和滿意度得分之間的差異.結果 入院時兩組EF、6MWT比較,差異無統計學意義(t值分彆為1.598,1.523;P均>0.05).齣院時觀察組EF (54.13±9.12)、6MWT(402.63±74.81),均高于對照組EF(43.26±8.57)、6MWT(336.16±75.82),兩組比較差異有統計學意義(t值分彆為2.093,2.145;P均<0.05);各組EF、6MWT齣院與入院時比較,差異有統計學意義(t值分彆為2.681,2.010,2.791,2.185;P均<0.01).齣院時兩組患者滿意度得分比較,差異有統計學意義(t =2.145,P<0.05).結論 全責護理模式用于慢性心力衰竭患者的康複訓練中可取得顯著效果.
목적 관찰전책호리모식재만성심력쇠갈환자강복훈련중적응용효과.방법 채용수궤수자표법장86례환자수궤분위관찰조(n=43)화대조조(n=43);16명호사분위A、B량조,A조실행전책호리모식,B조실행책임제화공능제상결합적호리모식;관찰조유A조호사부책강복훈련4주,대조조유B조호사부책강복훈련4주.비교량조환자인원시화출원시적사혈분수(EF)、6 min보행시험적거리(6MWT)화출원시환자대강복훈련지식적지효솔화만의도득분지간적차이.결과 입원시량조EF、6MWT비교,차이무통계학의의(t치분별위1.598,1.523;P균>0.05).출원시관찰조EF (54.13±9.12)、6MWT(402.63±74.81),균고우대조조EF(43.26±8.57)、6MWT(336.16±75.82),량조비교차이유통계학의의(t치분별위2.093,2.145;P균<0.05);각조EF、6MWT출원여입원시비교,차이유통계학의의(t치분별위2.681,2.010,2.791,2.185;P균<0.01).출원시량조환자만의도득분비교,차이유통계학의의(t =2.145,P<0.05).결론 전책호리모식용우만성심력쇠갈환자적강복훈련중가취득현저효과.
Objective To observe the effect of full-responsibility nursing model in rehabilitation exercise on patients with chronic heart failure (HF).Methods Eighty-six patients with HF were randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 43 cases in each group.sixteen nurses were randomly divided into A and B group ; A group carried out full - responsibility nursing model and was in charge of the rehabilitation exercise of observation group,B group carried out routine holistic nursing model and was in charge of the rehabilitation exercise of control group.After 4 weeks,the effects including EF,6MWT,the knowing of rehabilitation exercise,satisfaction to the hospital were evaluated.Results Before rehabilitation exercise,there were no significant differences in EF and 6MWT( P > 0.05 ).After 4 weeks,EF was( 54.13 ± 9.12 ) and 6MWT was (402.63 ± 74.81 ) in the observation group,while EF was (43.26 ± 8.57 ) and 6MWT was ( 336.16 ±75.82) in the control group.There were significant differences between the two groups ( t =2.093,2.145 ; P <0.05).there were significant differences before and after rehabilitation exercise in two groups ( P < D.05 ).After 4 weeks,EF and 6MWT of the two groups were both increased,but the effect of the observation group was better (P < 0.05 ). After 4 weeks,there were significant differences in the knowing of rehabilitation exercise and the satisfaction to the hospital in the two groups ( P < 0.05 ).Conclusions Full-responsibility nursing model in rehabilitation exercise can make an effective effect.