中华肿瘤杂志
中華腫瘤雜誌
중화종류잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
2010年
2期
156-157
,共2页
秦海%张锡朋%周毅%李会晨%李涛
秦海%張錫朋%週毅%李會晨%李濤
진해%장석붕%주의%리회신%리도
腹腔镜外科手术%直肠肿瘤%治疗
腹腔鏡外科手術%直腸腫瘤%治療
복강경외과수술%직장종류%치료
Laparoscopic surgery procedures%Rectal neoplasms%Therapy
目的 探讨腹腔镜伞直肠系膜切除(TME)手术治疗中低位直肠癌的效果.方法 2004年11月至2007年6月间在天津市人民医院行腹腔镜TME手术者83例,行开腹手术者85例,分别对两组患者的手术标本切缘、检出淋巴结数目以及手术并发症的发生率进行比较.结果 腹腔镜TME手术组患者手术切缘与肿瘤之间的距离为(3.21±1.25)cm,明显长于开腹手术组[(1.15±1.11)cm,P=0.001].腹腔镜TME手术组患者的淋巴结检出数为(12.53±1.88)枚,明显多于开腹手术组[(10.85±1.81)枚,P=0.01].腹腔镜TME手术组和开腹手术组患者并发症的发生率分别为12.0%和23.5%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.026).腹腔镜TME手术组患者术后进食的时间和使用止痛剂的时间分别为(2.43±1.06)d和(2.53±1.01)d,开腹手术组分别为(3.67±1.13)d和(4.55±1.78)d,腹腔镜TME手术组患者术后进食时间和使用止痛剂的时间均明显短于开腹手术组(P=0.005和P=0.008).结论 腹腔镜TME手术治疗中低位直肠癌是一种较为安全的术式,治疗效果与开腹手术相同,而且患者并发症的发生率和术后恢复情况均优于开腹手术.
目的 探討腹腔鏡傘直腸繫膜切除(TME)手術治療中低位直腸癌的效果.方法 2004年11月至2007年6月間在天津市人民醫院行腹腔鏡TME手術者83例,行開腹手術者85例,分彆對兩組患者的手術標本切緣、檢齣淋巴結數目以及手術併髮癥的髮生率進行比較.結果 腹腔鏡TME手術組患者手術切緣與腫瘤之間的距離為(3.21±1.25)cm,明顯長于開腹手術組[(1.15±1.11)cm,P=0.001].腹腔鏡TME手術組患者的淋巴結檢齣數為(12.53±1.88)枚,明顯多于開腹手術組[(10.85±1.81)枚,P=0.01].腹腔鏡TME手術組和開腹手術組患者併髮癥的髮生率分彆為12.0%和23.5%,差異有統計學意義(P=0.026).腹腔鏡TME手術組患者術後進食的時間和使用止痛劑的時間分彆為(2.43±1.06)d和(2.53±1.01)d,開腹手術組分彆為(3.67±1.13)d和(4.55±1.78)d,腹腔鏡TME手術組患者術後進食時間和使用止痛劑的時間均明顯短于開腹手術組(P=0.005和P=0.008).結論 腹腔鏡TME手術治療中低位直腸癌是一種較為安全的術式,治療效果與開腹手術相同,而且患者併髮癥的髮生率和術後恢複情況均優于開腹手術.
목적 탐토복강경산직장계막절제(TME)수술치료중저위직장암적효과.방법 2004년11월지2007년6월간재천진시인민의원행복강경TME수술자83례,행개복수술자85례,분별대량조환자적수술표본절연、검출림파결수목이급수술병발증적발생솔진행비교.결과 복강경TME수술조환자수술절연여종류지간적거리위(3.21±1.25)cm,명현장우개복수술조[(1.15±1.11)cm,P=0.001].복강경TME수술조환자적림파결검출수위(12.53±1.88)매,명현다우개복수술조[(10.85±1.81)매,P=0.01].복강경TME수술조화개복수술조환자병발증적발생솔분별위12.0%화23.5%,차이유통계학의의(P=0.026).복강경TME수술조환자술후진식적시간화사용지통제적시간분별위(2.43±1.06)d화(2.53±1.01)d,개복수술조분별위(3.67±1.13)d화(4.55±1.78)d,복강경TME수술조환자술후진식시간화사용지통제적시간균명현단우개복수술조(P=0.005화P=0.008).결론 복강경TME수술치료중저위직장암시일충교위안전적술식,치료효과여개복수술상동,이차환자병발증적발생솔화술후회복정황균우우개복수술.
Objective To study the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for middle or low rectal cancer. Methods 83 patients with middle or low rectal cancer received laparoscopic surgery and 85 patients received conventional open surgery. The cutting edge of specimens and number of lymph nodes were analyzed retrospectively. Results The mean distance between resected margin and the tumor was 3.21 ±1.25 cm in laparoscopic operation group, while it was 1.15±1.11 cm in the open surgery group (P= 0.001). The mean number of disected lymph nodes was 12.53±1.88 in the laparoscopic operation group and 10.85±1.81 in the open operation group (P=0.01). The incidence of postoperative complications was 12.0% in the laparoscopic operation group and 23.5% in the open operation group (P=0.026). The mean time of food intake and using analgesics after surgery were 2.43 ± 1.06 days and 2.53 ± 1.01 days, respectively, in the laparoscopic operation group, while the corresponding figures were 3.67±1.13 days and 4.55±1.78 days, respectively, in the open operation group(P=0.005, P=0.008). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is a safe and effective procedure for middle or low rectal cancer, with less postoperative complications and better recovery after treatment.