作物学报
作物學報
작물학보
ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA
2006年
6期
805-810
,共6页
孙黛珍%江玲%刘世家%张迎信%黄培鸿%程遐年%翟虎渠%万建民
孫黛珍%江玲%劉世傢%張迎信%黃培鴻%程遐年%翟虎渠%萬建民
손대진%강령%류세가%장영신%황배홍%정하년%적호거%만건민
水稻条纹叶枯病%介体灰飞虱%回交重组自交系%QTL分析%上位性
水稻條紋葉枯病%介體灰飛虱%迴交重組自交繫%QTL分析%上位性
수도조문협고병%개체회비슬%회교중조자교계%QTL분석%상위성
Rice stripe virus%Laodelphax striatellus Fallen%Backcross inbred lines (BILs)%QTL analysis%Epistasis
水稻品种Kasalath高抗条纹病毒和介体灰飞虱.为剖析不同抗性类型基因之间的关系,利用回交重组自交系群体Nipponbare/Kasalath//Nipponbare分析了对条纹病毒和介体灰飞虱抗性的数量性状基因座.结果在第11染色体S2260~G257标记区间检测到1个与条纹病毒抗性相关的QTL(qSTV11),LOD值为9.2,贡献率为35.79%;在第3染色体R1618~C595和R2170~C1135标记区间各检测到1个与介体灰飞虱抗性相关的QTL(qSBPH3-a,qSBPH3-b),LOD值和贡献率分别为3.12和2.96,11.69%和11.36%,表明条纹病毒和介体灰飞虱抗性由不同基因所控制,而且两者之间不相关.此外,还分别检测到两对与条纹病毒和介体灰飞虱抗性相关的上位性QTL,暗示水稻对条纹病毒和介体灰飞虱的抗性受主效和上位性QTL的共同影响.进一步分析发现SSR标记BJ11-8与qSTV11紧密连锁,为分子标记辅助选择高抗条纹叶枯病水稻品种提供了基础.
水稻品種Kasalath高抗條紋病毒和介體灰飛虱.為剖析不同抗性類型基因之間的關繫,利用迴交重組自交繫群體Nipponbare/Kasalath//Nipponbare分析瞭對條紋病毒和介體灰飛虱抗性的數量性狀基因座.結果在第11染色體S2260~G257標記區間檢測到1箇與條紋病毒抗性相關的QTL(qSTV11),LOD值為9.2,貢獻率為35.79%;在第3染色體R1618~C595和R2170~C1135標記區間各檢測到1箇與介體灰飛虱抗性相關的QTL(qSBPH3-a,qSBPH3-b),LOD值和貢獻率分彆為3.12和2.96,11.69%和11.36%,錶明條紋病毒和介體灰飛虱抗性由不同基因所控製,而且兩者之間不相關.此外,還分彆檢測到兩對與條紋病毒和介體灰飛虱抗性相關的上位性QTL,暗示水稻對條紋病毒和介體灰飛虱的抗性受主效和上位性QTL的共同影響.進一步分析髮現SSR標記BJ11-8與qSTV11緊密連鎖,為分子標記輔助選擇高抗條紋葉枯病水稻品種提供瞭基礎.
수도품충Kasalath고항조문병독화개체회비슬.위부석불동항성류형기인지간적관계,이용회교중조자교계군체Nipponbare/Kasalath//Nipponbare분석료대조문병독화개체회비슬항성적수량성상기인좌.결과재제11염색체S2260~G257표기구간검측도1개여조문병독항성상관적QTL(qSTV11),LOD치위9.2,공헌솔위35.79%;재제3염색체R1618~C595화R2170~C1135표기구간각검측도1개여개체회비슬항성상관적QTL(qSBPH3-a,qSBPH3-b),LOD치화공헌솔분별위3.12화2.96,11.69%화11.36%,표명조문병독화개체회비슬항성유불동기인소공제,이차량자지간불상관.차외,환분별검측도량대여조문병독화개체회비슬항성상관적상위성QTL,암시수도대조문병독화개체회비슬적항성수주효화상위성QTL적공동영향.진일보분석발현SSR표기BJ11-8여qSTV11긴밀련쇄,위분자표기보조선택고항조문협고병수도품충제공료기출.
An indica variety, Kasalath, is highly resistant to rice stripe virus and small brown planthopper. In order to dissect the relationship between rice stripe virus and small brown planthopper resistance genes, the QTLs were detected using Nipponbase/Kasalath//Nipponbare backcross inbred lines. One putative QTL ( qSTV11 ) for the ratio of disease rating index was mapped between the marker S2260 and G257 on chromosome 11, which explained 35.79% of the totalphenotypic variation with LOD score of 9.2. The positive resistant effect came from Kasalath. The two QTLs ( qSBPH3-a and qSBPH3-b) for non-preference index were detected on chromosome 3, and their contributions to the total variation were 11.69% and 11.36% with LOD scores of 3.12 and 2.96, respectively. This suggests that the rice stripe virus and small brown planthopper resistance are controlled by different genes and this view is testified by no significant correlation between RSV and SBPH resistance. Then, two pairs of epistatic QTLs for ratio of disease rating index and non-preference index were respectively detected, showing the rice stripe virus and small brown planthopper resistance were influenced by main-effect QTLs and epistatic QTLs. Additionally, further study found that SSR marker BJ11-8 was tightly linked to qSTV11. This facilitates the breeding process for resistance to rice stripe disease by marker-assisted selection.