中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2012年
22期
2640-2642
,共3页
王引侠%冯小菊%张亚军%王继红%严小芬%马媛
王引俠%馮小菊%張亞軍%王繼紅%嚴小芬%馬媛
왕인협%풍소국%장아군%왕계홍%엄소분%마원
优质护理%绩效考核%护士长管理
優質護理%績效攷覈%護士長管理
우질호리%적효고핵%호사장관리
High-quality nursing%Performance appraisal%Head nurse management
目的 探讨全面、科学、有效的护士长管理考评方法.方法 建立护士长绩效考核机制,并应用于护士长管理考评中,对实施前后护理质量评分及医护人员对护士长工作满意度及护士长对护理部管理方法的认可度进行比较.结果 实施护士长绩效考核后护理质量得分:护士长管理(97.43±2.41)分,各班工作质量(96.39 ±4.51)分,护理文件书写(97.75 ±4.25)分,基础护理(96.11±1.96)分,三基考核(95.12 ±4.29)分,明显高于实施前(90.03±1.23)分,(89.26±2.19)分,(90.10 ±3.37)分,(90.94±2.54)分,(89.25 ±5.48)分,两者比较,差异具有统计学意义(t分别为12.63,10.12,12.72,12.23,10.06;P<0.05);实施前后住院患者满意度分别为91.19%和98.04%,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(x2=6.02,P<0.05);实施后医护人员对护士长工作满意度及护士长对护理部管理方法的认可度也分别提升(x2分别为6.78,6.46,P均<0.05).结论 科学的护士长绩效考核方案有利于提升护士长的综合管理能力,确保护理质量与安全,增强医院的组织核心竞争力.
目的 探討全麵、科學、有效的護士長管理攷評方法.方法 建立護士長績效攷覈機製,併應用于護士長管理攷評中,對實施前後護理質量評分及醫護人員對護士長工作滿意度及護士長對護理部管理方法的認可度進行比較.結果 實施護士長績效攷覈後護理質量得分:護士長管理(97.43±2.41)分,各班工作質量(96.39 ±4.51)分,護理文件書寫(97.75 ±4.25)分,基礎護理(96.11±1.96)分,三基攷覈(95.12 ±4.29)分,明顯高于實施前(90.03±1.23)分,(89.26±2.19)分,(90.10 ±3.37)分,(90.94±2.54)分,(89.25 ±5.48)分,兩者比較,差異具有統計學意義(t分彆為12.63,10.12,12.72,12.23,10.06;P<0.05);實施前後住院患者滿意度分彆為91.19%和98.04%,兩者比較,差異有統計學意義(x2=6.02,P<0.05);實施後醫護人員對護士長工作滿意度及護士長對護理部管理方法的認可度也分彆提升(x2分彆為6.78,6.46,P均<0.05).結論 科學的護士長績效攷覈方案有利于提升護士長的綜閤管理能力,確保護理質量與安全,增彊醫院的組織覈心競爭力.
목적 탐토전면、과학、유효적호사장관리고평방법.방법 건립호사장적효고핵궤제,병응용우호사장관리고평중,대실시전후호리질량평분급의호인원대호사장공작만의도급호사장대호리부관리방법적인가도진행비교.결과 실시호사장적효고핵후호리질량득분:호사장관리(97.43±2.41)분,각반공작질량(96.39 ±4.51)분,호리문건서사(97.75 ±4.25)분,기출호리(96.11±1.96)분,삼기고핵(95.12 ±4.29)분,명현고우실시전(90.03±1.23)분,(89.26±2.19)분,(90.10 ±3.37)분,(90.94±2.54)분,(89.25 ±5.48)분,량자비교,차이구유통계학의의(t분별위12.63,10.12,12.72,12.23,10.06;P<0.05);실시전후주원환자만의도분별위91.19%화98.04%,량자비교,차이유통계학의의(x2=6.02,P<0.05);실시후의호인원대호사장공작만의도급호사장대호리부관리방법적인가도야분별제승(x2분별위6.78,6.46,P균<0.05).결론 과학적호사장적효고핵방안유리우제승호사장적종합관리능력,학보호리질량여안전,증강의원적조직핵심경쟁력.
Objective To explore a comprehensive,scientific and effective approach in head nurse management.Methods Performance appraisal for head nurses was established and applied in the management.Grading of the nursing quality,medical personnel' s satisfaction with head nurses and head nurses' recognition of management were compared before and after performance appraisal.Results The scores of nursing quality after performance appraisal were (97.43 ± 2.41) in head nurse management,(96.39 ± 4.51) in performance quality,(97.75 ±4.25) in nursing document writing,(96.11 ± 1.96) in basic care and (95.12 ±4.29) in basic knowledge,all of which were higher than those before performance appraisal [ (90.03 ± 1.23),(89.26 ±2.19),(90.10 ± 3.37),(90.94 ± 2.54),(89.25 ± 5.48),respectively ].The differences were statistically significant (t =12.63,10.12,12.72,12.23,10.06,respectively; P < 0.05).Inpatients' satisfaction before and after performance appraisal were 91.19% and 98.04%,and the differences were statistically significant (x2 =6.02 ;P < 0.05).Medical personnel's satisfaction with head nurses and head nurses' recognition of the management had also been improved (x2 =6.78,6.46,respectively;P <0.05).Conclusions The application of performance appraisal can improve head nurses' comprehensive management ability,ensure nursing quality and safety,and enhance core competitiveness of hospitals' organization.