目的:比较传统前路手术与腔镜辅助下小切口前路手术治疗胸腰段脊椎爆裂骨折的早期临床效果.方法:2005年1月~2008年12月共对62例胸腰段脊椎爆裂骨折患者实施了前路手术,其中传统前路手术35例,男19例,女16例,平均年龄42岁,骨折节段:T11 2例,T12 12例,L1 18例,L2 3例,平均后凸角19.5°,33例伴不完全性截瘫;腔镜辅助下小切口前路手术27例,男15例,女12例,平均年龄39岁,骨折节段:T11 2例,T12 9例,L1 14例,L2 2例,平均后凸角18.8°,26例伴有不完全性瘫痪.随访两组患者的早期治疗效果.结果:均顺利完成手术,无血管损伤及脊髓损伤加重病例.传统手术组平均手术时间190min,平均出血量1000ml,术后2d内平均引流量450ml/d;腔镜小切口组平均手术时间230min,平均出血量600ml,术后2d内平均引流量275ml/d,二组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05).传统手术组后凸角平均纠正至5.2°,腔镜小切口组平均矫正至5.9°,二组无显著性差异(P>0.05).传统手术组有5例患者出现动力性肠梗阻,9例腹壁皮神经损伤,3例肺不张,1例切口愈合不良;腔镜小切口组出现2例动力性肠梗阻,3例腹壁皮神经损伤,1例肺不张,经对症处理后均痊愈.随访8~24个月,平均16.5个月,两组患者均获得良好骨性融合,无内固定失败和矫正度明显丢失.59例不完全截瘫患者神经功能均获得1级以上改善.结论:采用传统前路手术和腔镜辅助下小切口前路手术治疗胸腰段脊椎爆裂骨折均能取得良好的早期疗效,但腔镜辅助下小切口前路手术损伤较小,并发症较少.
目的:比較傳統前路手術與腔鏡輔助下小切口前路手術治療胸腰段脊椎爆裂骨摺的早期臨床效果.方法:2005年1月~2008年12月共對62例胸腰段脊椎爆裂骨摺患者實施瞭前路手術,其中傳統前路手術35例,男19例,女16例,平均年齡42歲,骨摺節段:T11 2例,T12 12例,L1 18例,L2 3例,平均後凸角19.5°,33例伴不完全性截癱;腔鏡輔助下小切口前路手術27例,男15例,女12例,平均年齡39歲,骨摺節段:T11 2例,T12 9例,L1 14例,L2 2例,平均後凸角18.8°,26例伴有不完全性癱瘓.隨訪兩組患者的早期治療效果.結果:均順利完成手術,無血管損傷及脊髓損傷加重病例.傳統手術組平均手術時間190min,平均齣血量1000ml,術後2d內平均引流量450ml/d;腔鏡小切口組平均手術時間230min,平均齣血量600ml,術後2d內平均引流量275ml/d,二組比較有顯著性差異(P<0.05).傳統手術組後凸角平均糾正至5.2°,腔鏡小切口組平均矯正至5.9°,二組無顯著性差異(P>0.05).傳統手術組有5例患者齣現動力性腸梗阻,9例腹壁皮神經損傷,3例肺不張,1例切口愈閤不良;腔鏡小切口組齣現2例動力性腸梗阻,3例腹壁皮神經損傷,1例肺不張,經對癥處理後均痊愈.隨訪8~24箇月,平均16.5箇月,兩組患者均穫得良好骨性融閤,無內固定失敗和矯正度明顯丟失.59例不完全截癱患者神經功能均穫得1級以上改善.結論:採用傳統前路手術和腔鏡輔助下小切口前路手術治療胸腰段脊椎爆裂骨摺均能取得良好的早期療效,但腔鏡輔助下小切口前路手術損傷較小,併髮癥較少.
목적:비교전통전로수술여강경보조하소절구전로수술치료흉요단척추폭렬골절적조기림상효과.방법:2005년1월~2008년12월공대62례흉요단척추폭렬골절환자실시료전로수술,기중전통전로수술35례,남19례,녀16례,평균년령42세,골절절단:T11 2례,T12 12례,L1 18례,L2 3례,평균후철각19.5°,33례반불완전성절탄;강경보조하소절구전로수술27례,남15례,녀12례,평균년령39세,골절절단:T11 2례,T12 9례,L1 14례,L2 2례,평균후철각18.8°,26례반유불완전성탄탄.수방량조환자적조기치료효과.결과:균순리완성수술,무혈관손상급척수손상가중병례.전통수술조평균수술시간190min,평균출혈량1000ml,술후2d내평균인류량450ml/d;강경소절구조평균수술시간230min,평균출혈량600ml,술후2d내평균인류량275ml/d,이조비교유현저성차이(P<0.05).전통수술조후철각평균규정지5.2°,강경소절구조평균교정지5.9°,이조무현저성차이(P>0.05).전통수술조유5례환자출현동력성장경조,9례복벽피신경손상,3례폐불장,1례절구유합불량;강경소절구조출현2례동력성장경조,3례복벽피신경손상,1례폐불장,경대증처리후균전유.수방8~24개월,평균16.5개월,량조환자균획득량호골성융합,무내고정실패화교정도명현주실.59례불완전절탄환자신경공능균획득1급이상개선.결론:채용전통전로수술화강경보조하소절구전로수술치료흉요단척추폭렬골절균능취득량호적조기료효,단강경보조하소절구전로수술손상교소,병발증교소.
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of the traditional anterior surgical method and the thoracoscope-assisted minimal incision surgery for thorocolumbar burst fracture.Method:62 patients with thoro-columbar burst fracture were treated either by traditional anterior surgery,or by thoracoscope -assisted minimal incision anterior surgery between January 2005 and December 2008.There were 35 patients in traditional group,with 19 males and 15 females,the average age was 42 years,the segements were involved as follows, T11 in 2 cases,T12 in 12 cases,L1 in 18 cases,L2 in 3 cases,and the average kyphotic angle was 19.5°. 33 cases suffered incomplete paraplegia.There were 27 patients in thoracoscope-assisted minimal group,with 15 males and 12 females,the average age was 39 years,the involved segements were T11 in 2 cases,T12 in 9 cases,L1 in 14 cases,L2 in 2 cases,and the average kyphotic angle was 18.8°,23 cases suffered incom-plete paraplegia.The early therapeutic efficacy of all patients in both groups was observed by follow-up.Re-sult:All operations were successful,no complication related to blood vessels or spinal injury occurred.In tradi-tional group,the average operation time was 190min,the mean blood loss was 1000ml,the mean drainage vol-ume within the first two days was 450ml,while in thoracoscope-assisted minimal incision group,operation time was 230min,the blood loss was 600ml,the drainage volume within the first two days was 275ml.There were significant difference in these data between the two groups(P<0.05),but no difference in the correction rate of kyphotic angle (P>0.05) as mean correction angle of the kyphosis was 18.1 °by traditional method,18.5° by the minimal incision group.The fellow-un time was 16.5 months (ranze.from 8~24 months) .There was no fail-ure of internal fixation and no loss of corrective kyphotic angle in two groups,all patients had successfully bony fusion.Postoperative neurological ruction was improved at least Ⅰ degree for all incomplete paraplegia patients.In traditional group,the complications included 5 cases with dynamic ileus,9 cases with iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerve injury,3 cases with pulmonary atelectasis,and 1 case with wound healing problem. There were 2 cases with dynamic ileus,3 cases with iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerve injury, 1 case with pulmonary in thoraeoscope-assisted minimal group.All above complications were cured by symptomatic treat-ment .Conclusion:Both traditional anterior surgery and thorascope-assisted minimal incision surgery for thoracolumbar burst fracture may obtain a satisfactory outcome at early clinical stage,but the thoraco-scope-assisted minimal incision surgery can provide less complication and tissue invasion.