中华医学教育杂志
中華醫學教育雜誌
중화의학교육잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION
2008年
5期
120-122
,共3页
马治勇%谢良军%车承红%孙建平%杨宝峰
馬治勇%謝良軍%車承紅%孫建平%楊寶峰
마치용%사량군%차승홍%손건평%양보봉
药理学%试卷分析%成绩分析%教学评价
藥理學%試捲分析%成績分析%教學評價
약이학%시권분석%성적분석%교학평개
Pharmacology%Analysis of test paper%Analysis of result%Evaluation of teaching
目的 分析和评价临床药学专业一份药理学试卷的质量.方法 采用统计学方法对学生的考试成绩进行处理,分析试卷的试题质量.结果 学生的考试成绩呈正态分布,平均成绩76.12分,平均难度0.76,总区分度1.18,信度0.78.结论 这份药理学试卷能够较全面地评价学生对课程的掌握程度,试题难度适中,区分度很好,考试成绩可信,比较全面、客观地评价了学生对药理学课程的掌握程度.
目的 分析和評價臨床藥學專業一份藥理學試捲的質量.方法 採用統計學方法對學生的攷試成績進行處理,分析試捲的試題質量.結果 學生的攷試成績呈正態分佈,平均成績76.12分,平均難度0.76,總區分度1.18,信度0.78.結論 這份藥理學試捲能夠較全麵地評價學生對課程的掌握程度,試題難度適中,區分度很好,攷試成績可信,比較全麵、客觀地評價瞭學生對藥理學課程的掌握程度.
목적 분석화평개림상약학전업일빈약이학시권적질량.방법 채용통계학방법대학생적고시성적진행처리,분석시권적시제질량.결과 학생적고시성적정정태분포,평균성적76.12분,평균난도0.76,총구분도1.18,신도0.78.결론 저빈약이학시권능구교전면지평개학생대과정적장악정도,시제난도괄중,구분도흔호,고시성적가신,비교전면、객관지평개료학생대약이학과정적장악정도.
Objective This paper analyzes and evaluates the quality of pharmacology test paper of clinical pharmacy undergraduate students. Method The examinational results are treated using statistics method. Results The students'scores are normal distribution, with the mean score being 76.12, the av-erage difficulty being 0.76, the discrimination being 1.18 and the paper reliability being 0.78. Conclu-sions The examinatiorial scores show a good assessment of the students' ability to master knowledge. The difficulty of the exam paper is appropriate, the discrimination of examination question is significant, and the test record is reliable. It evaluates comprehensively and objectively to the extent which students master the course.
