CAJ | 학술논문

目的研究救援军人心理弹性状况及影响因素.方法采用成人心理弹性量表(RSA)、症状自评量表(SCL-90)、艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)和应对方式问卷对1401名救援军人进行整群抽样调查.结果 ①救援军人心理弹性均分为(2.49±0.57)分,显著低于大学生(t=16.619,P=0.000);军龄≥3年的救援军人在社会能力(t=2.581,P=0.01)、社会资源(t=2.158,P=0.031)、计划风格(t=3.254,P=0.001)和RSA总均分(t=2.455,P=0.014)得分显著高于军龄≤2年的救援人员;不同文化程度的救援军人在自我认知(t=3.732,P=0.024)、未来计划(t=9.324,P=0.000)、社会能力(t=8.838,P=0.000)、社会资源(t=13.660,P=0.000)和RSA总均分(t=9.805,P=0.000)上有显著差异,且大学≥高中≥初中.②RSA高分组在内外向(t=16.204,P=0.000)和积极应对(t=18.171,P=0.000)得分均显著高于低分组,而在SCL-90均分(t=8.461,P=0.000)和神经质得分(t=8.833,P=0.000)均显著低于低分组;③救援军人的心理弹性与文化程度(r=0.116)、内外向(r=0.463)和积极应对(r=0.500)有显著的正相关,与SCL-90(r=-0.260)及神经质(r=-0.251)有显著的负相关;进一步进行同归分析发现,积极应对、内外向及神经质对心理弹性有35.9%的预测.结论救援军人心理弹性水平显著低于大学生,积极应对、内外向及神经质是影响救援军人心理弹性的重要因素.
목적 연구구원군인심리탄성상황급영향인소.방법 채용성인심리탄성량표(RSA)、증상자평량표(SCL-90)、애삼극인격문권(EPQ)화응대방식문권대1401명구원군인진행정군추양조사.결과 ①구원군인심리탄성균분위(2.49±0.57)분,현저저우대학생(t=16.619,P=0.000);군령≥3년적구원군인재사회능력(t=2.581,P=0.01)、사회자원(t=2.158,P=0.031)、계화풍격(t=3.254,P=0.001)화RSA총균분(t=2.455,P=0.014)득분현저고우군령≤2년적구원인원;불동문화정도적구원군인재자아인지(t=3.732,P=0.024)、미래계화(t=9.324,P=0.000)、사회능력(t=8.838,P=0.000)、사회자원(t=13.660,P=0.000)화RSA총균분(t=9.805,P=0.000)상유현저차이,차대학≥고중≥초중.②RSA고분조재내외향(t=16.204,P=0.000)화적겁응대(t=18.171,P=0.000)득분균현저고우저분조,이재SCL-90균분(t=8.461,P=0.000)화신경질득분(t=8.833,P=0.000)균현저저우저분조;③구원군인적심리탄성여문화정도(r=0.116)、내외향(r=0.463)화적겁응대(r=0.500)유현저적정상관,여SCL-90(r=-0.260)급신경질(r=-0.251)유현저적부상관;진일보진행동귀분석발현,적겁응대、내외향급신경질대심리탄성유35.9%적예측.결론 구원군인심리탄성수평현저저우대학생,적겁응대、내외향급신경질시영향구원군인심리탄성적중요인소.
Objective To research the resilience and related factors of the rescue soldiers. Methods Resilience Scale for Adults( RSA ), Self-report Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire(EPQ) and Coping Style Questionnaire were applied in this survey to 1401 rescue soldiers. Results ①The soldiers' resilience score was (2.49±0.57) ,significantly lower than college students( t= 16.619, P=0. 000).The rescue soldiers with the year in army above 3 were significantly higher than that below 2 years in social competence( t=2.581, P=0.01 ) ,social resources( t=2. 158, P=0.031 ) ,structured style( t=3.254, P=0.001 ) and RSA scores(t=2.455, P=0.014). There exist significantly differences in various education level of the rescue soldiers in perception of self(t=3.732, P=0.024), planned of future ( t = 9.324, P = 0.000 ) , social competence ( t = 8. 838, P = 0.000 ), social resources ( t = 13. 660, P = 0. 000 ) and RSA scores (t=9.805, P=0.000) , and college ≥ senior high school ≥ junior high school. ②Compared to the lower group in the RSA, the higher group scored significantly higher in extraversion (t=16. 204, P=0.000) and positive coping( t = - 18. 171, P=0.000), while lower in SCL-90 (t=8.461, P=0.000) and neuroticism (t=8.833, P=0.000 ).③Resilience have the obvious positive correlation with the education ( r= 0. 116 ), extraversion ( r= 0. 463 ) and positive coping(r=0.500) ,and negative correlation with the neuroticism(r=-0.251 ) and SCL-90( r= -0.260). It can be assumed that positive coping,extraversion and neuroticism had good predictive ability(35.9％) to resilience. Conclusion The rescue soldiers have low resilience than college students, positive coping, extraversion, and neuroticism are important psychological factors for rescue soldiers.