浙江临床医学
浙江臨床醫學
절강림상의학
ZHEJIANG CLINICAL MEDICAL JOURNAL
2001年
3期
153-154
,共2页
异丙酚%硬膜外阻滞%氟哌啶%哌替啶
異丙酚%硬膜外阻滯%氟哌啶%哌替啶
이병분%경막외조체%불고정%고체정
Proposol Epidural blockade Pethidine Droperidol
目的观察比较异丙酚和哌替啶、氟哌啶辅助上腹部手术的临床效果。方法选择46例ASAⅠ-Ⅱ级行上腹部手术患者,随机分为异丙酚组(Ⅰ组)与哌、氟组(Ⅱ组),每组23例。硬膜外阻滞选T8-10,阻滞平面控制在T3-4阻滞平面稳定后,Ⅰ组静注负荷量异丙酚0.75mg/kg,5min后微泵持续输注2mg·kg-1·h-1,Ⅱ组静注哌替啶50mg,氟哌啶2.5mg。观察记录注药前后各时点参数值及不良反应、术中感受。结果Ⅰ组注药后5minSpO2明显下降(p<0.05),Ⅱ组注药后10min,20minSpO2明显下降(p<0.05)。VAS评分Ⅰ组(90%)明显高于Ⅱ组(30%)(p<0.05)。Ⅰ组不良反应发生率明显降低。结论异丙酚辅助硬膜外神经阻滞行上腹部手术安全可行,优于哌、氟合剂。
目的觀察比較異丙酚和哌替啶、氟哌啶輔助上腹部手術的臨床效果。方法選擇46例ASAⅠ-Ⅱ級行上腹部手術患者,隨機分為異丙酚組(Ⅰ組)與哌、氟組(Ⅱ組),每組23例。硬膜外阻滯選T8-10,阻滯平麵控製在T3-4阻滯平麵穩定後,Ⅰ組靜註負荷量異丙酚0.75mg/kg,5min後微泵持續輸註2mg·kg-1·h-1,Ⅱ組靜註哌替啶50mg,氟哌啶2.5mg。觀察記錄註藥前後各時點參數值及不良反應、術中感受。結果Ⅰ組註藥後5minSpO2明顯下降(p<0.05),Ⅱ組註藥後10min,20minSpO2明顯下降(p<0.05)。VAS評分Ⅰ組(90%)明顯高于Ⅱ組(30%)(p<0.05)。Ⅰ組不良反應髮生率明顯降低。結論異丙酚輔助硬膜外神經阻滯行上腹部手術安全可行,優于哌、氟閤劑。
목적관찰비교이병분화고체정、불고정보조상복부수술적림상효과。방법선택46례ASAⅠ-Ⅱ급행상복부수술환자,수궤분위이병분조(Ⅰ조)여고、불조(Ⅱ조),매조23례。경막외조체선T8-10,조체평면공제재T3-4조체평면은정후,Ⅰ조정주부하량이병분0.75mg/kg,5min후미빙지속수주2mg·kg-1·h-1,Ⅱ조정주고체정50mg,불고정2.5mg。관찰기록주약전후각시점삼수치급불량반응、술중감수。결과Ⅰ조주약후5minSpO2명현하강(p<0.05),Ⅱ조주약후10min,20minSpO2명현하강(p<0.05)。VAS평분Ⅰ조(90%)명현고우Ⅱ조(30%)(p<0.05)。Ⅰ조불량반응발생솔명현강저。결론이병분보조경막외신경조체행상복부수술안전가행,우우고、불합제。
Objective To observe the effect of propofol as an adjuvant during epidural blockade in upper abdominal surgery. Methods 46 ASA Ⅰ ~ Ⅱ patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery were allocated randomly into group Ⅰ (propofol group) or group Ⅱ (50mg pethidine and 2.5mg droperidol). Results A significant decrease of SpO2 was observed 5 min after a bolus of propofol in group Ⅰ and 10~ 20 min after pethidine and droperidol were given in group Ⅱ . The VAS>7― 8 reached 90% in group Ⅰ , but only 30% in group Ⅱ . Conclusion As an adjuvant of epidural blockade, propofol was safe and better than pethidine and droperidol mixture.