中国医师进修杂志
中國醫師進脩雜誌
중국의사진수잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATES OF MEDICINE
2008年
36期
14-16
,共3页
魏秀吾%陈真福%范双炽%钟进财
魏秀吾%陳真福%範雙熾%鐘進財
위수오%진진복%범쌍치%종진재
曲安奈德%腰椎间盘突出症%骶管阻滞
麯安奈德%腰椎間盤突齣癥%骶管阻滯
곡안내덕%요추간반돌출증%저관조체
Triamcinolone acetonide%Lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion%Sacral block
目的 研究骶管阻滞与硬膜外阻滞治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床应用价值,并对骶管阻滞的技术操作及适应证和禁忌证进行探讨.方法 腰椎间盘突出症患者120例采用骶管阻滞(骶管组),于骶管腔注入(曲安奈德40 mg、维生素B1 100 mg、维生素B12 1 mg、2%利多卡因100 mg,用0.9%氯化钠稀释为20~30 ml),2周1次,3次为1个疗程.并与硬膜外阻滞治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者120例(硬膜外组)的疗效进行对比观察.结果 一次性穿刺成功率骶管组为93.3%(112/120),硬膜外组为82.5%(99/120),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗后骶管组、硬膜外组优良率分别为85.0%(102/120)、93.3%(112/120),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);可差率分别为15.0%(18/120)、6.7%(8/120),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 骶管阻滞和硬膜外阻滞均为治疗腰椎间盘突出症的有效疗法,能较快解除神经根压迫症状和强迫体位.而骶管阻滞较硬膜外阻滞操作简单、安全性较高.
目的 研究骶管阻滯與硬膜外阻滯治療腰椎間盤突齣癥臨床應用價值,併對骶管阻滯的技術操作及適應證和禁忌證進行探討.方法 腰椎間盤突齣癥患者120例採用骶管阻滯(骶管組),于骶管腔註入(麯安奈德40 mg、維生素B1 100 mg、維生素B12 1 mg、2%利多卡因100 mg,用0.9%氯化鈉稀釋為20~30 ml),2週1次,3次為1箇療程.併與硬膜外阻滯治療腰椎間盤突齣癥患者120例(硬膜外組)的療效進行對比觀察.結果 一次性穿刺成功率骶管組為93.3%(112/120),硬膜外組為82.5%(99/120),兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).治療後骶管組、硬膜外組優良率分彆為85.0%(102/120)、93.3%(112/120),差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);可差率分彆為15.0%(18/120)、6.7%(8/120),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 骶管阻滯和硬膜外阻滯均為治療腰椎間盤突齣癥的有效療法,能較快解除神經根壓迫癥狀和彊迫體位.而骶管阻滯較硬膜外阻滯操作簡單、安全性較高.
목적 연구저관조체여경막외조체치료요추간반돌출증림상응용개치,병대저관조체적기술조작급괄응증화금기증진행탐토.방법 요추간반돌출증환자120례채용저관조체(저관조),우저관강주입(곡안내덕40 mg、유생소B1 100 mg、유생소B12 1 mg、2%리다잡인100 mg,용0.9%록화납희석위20~30 ml),2주1차,3차위1개료정.병여경막외조체치료요추간반돌출증환자120례(경막외조)적료효진행대비관찰.결과 일차성천자성공솔저관조위93.3%(112/120),경막외조위82.5%(99/120),량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).치료후저관조、경막외조우량솔분별위85.0%(102/120)、93.3%(112/120),차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);가차솔분별위15.0%(18/120)、6.7%(8/120),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 저관조체화경막외조체균위치료요추간반돌출증적유효요법,능교쾌해제신경근압박증상화강박체위.이저관조체교경막외조체조작간단、안전성교고.
Objective To study clinical application value of sacral and epidural block in treating lumbar intervertehral disc protrusion (LIDP), and explore technical operation methods, indications and con-traindications of sacral block. Methods Sacral block was adopted in 120 patients with LIDP(sacral group), they were injected triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg, vitamin B1 100 mg, vitamin B12 1 mg, 2% lidocaine 100 mg, added physiological saline 20-30 ml, twice a week, three times as a period. Compared therapy effect with epidural block (120 cases, epidural group). Results The achievement ratio of once puncture was 93.3% (112/120) in sacral group and 82.5% (99/120) in epidural group, P < 0.05. After treatment, the excellent and good rate of sacral group and epidural group were 85.0%(102/120) and 93.3%(112/120), there was not obvious difference, P>0.05, but the fair and bad rate were 15.0%(18/120) and 6.7%(8/120), there was ob-vious difference, P<0.05. Conclusions Sacral block and epidural block are effective methods to treat LIDP. They can relieve the stress at nerve root, especially sacral block, which has the advantages of easily operation, less pain, less side effect and safety.