中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2009年
7期
476-479
,共4页
陆维举%李斌%刘刚%曾晓峰%张杏泉%张俊杰%钱宏波%陈勇%赵建宁
陸維舉%李斌%劉剛%曾曉峰%張杏泉%張俊傑%錢宏波%陳勇%趙建寧
륙유거%리빈%류강%증효봉%장행천%장준걸%전굉파%진용%조건저
骨移植%外固定器%清创术
骨移植%外固定器%清創術
골이식%외고정기%청창술
Bone transplantation%External fixators%Debridement
目的 探讨颗粒状松质骨移植治疗感染性骨不连伴大段骨缺损的效果.方法 对19例(20个部位)感染性骨不连伴大段骨缺损患者进行清创、外固定、颗粒状松质骨移植方法 治疗,其中自体骨移植14例(15个部位),异体骨移植5例.结果 平均随访32.7个月(20~56个月).5例异体骨移植患者均无感染复发,其中3例获得骨愈合,外固定指数是(2.22±0.84)个月/cm;2例发生骨不连,再次手术取自体松质骨植骨获得骨愈合.14例(15个部位)自体骨移植患者,2例(2个部位,13.3%)感染复发导致植入骨吸收骨不连,接受再次清创自体骨移植获得骨连接、感染消灭;12例(13个部位,86.7%)骨愈合患者,外固定指数是(1.96±0.74)个月/cm.共3例(4个部位)发生再骨折,分别接受石膏固定、外固定支架及内固定获得骨愈合.结论感染性骨不连伴大段骨缺损采用自体颗粒状松质骨移植是合适的;异体骨移植骨不连发生率高、外固定时间长,应慎用.
目的 探討顆粒狀鬆質骨移植治療感染性骨不連伴大段骨缺損的效果.方法 對19例(20箇部位)感染性骨不連伴大段骨缺損患者進行清創、外固定、顆粒狀鬆質骨移植方法 治療,其中自體骨移植14例(15箇部位),異體骨移植5例.結果 平均隨訪32.7箇月(20~56箇月).5例異體骨移植患者均無感染複髮,其中3例穫得骨愈閤,外固定指數是(2.22±0.84)箇月/cm;2例髮生骨不連,再次手術取自體鬆質骨植骨穫得骨愈閤.14例(15箇部位)自體骨移植患者,2例(2箇部位,13.3%)感染複髮導緻植入骨吸收骨不連,接受再次清創自體骨移植穫得骨連接、感染消滅;12例(13箇部位,86.7%)骨愈閤患者,外固定指數是(1.96±0.74)箇月/cm.共3例(4箇部位)髮生再骨摺,分彆接受石膏固定、外固定支架及內固定穫得骨愈閤.結論感染性骨不連伴大段骨缺損採用自體顆粒狀鬆質骨移植是閤適的;異體骨移植骨不連髮生率高、外固定時間長,應慎用.
목적 탐토과립상송질골이식치료감염성골불련반대단골결손적효과.방법 대19례(20개부위)감염성골불련반대단골결손환자진행청창、외고정、과립상송질골이식방법 치료,기중자체골이식14례(15개부위),이체골이식5례.결과 평균수방32.7개월(20~56개월).5례이체골이식환자균무감염복발,기중3례획득골유합,외고정지수시(2.22±0.84)개월/cm;2례발생골불련,재차수술취자체송질골식골획득골유합.14례(15개부위)자체골이식환자,2례(2개부위,13.3%)감염복발도치식입골흡수골불련,접수재차청창자체골이식획득골련접、감염소멸;12례(13개부위,86.7%)골유합환자,외고정지수시(1.96±0.74)개월/cm.공3례(4개부위)발생재골절,분별접수석고고정、외고정지가급내고정획득골유합.결론감염성골불련반대단골결손채용자체과립상송질골이식시합괄적;이체골이식골불련발생솔고、외고정시간장,응신용.
Objective To investigate the curative effect of managing infected nonunion with large skeletal defects utilizing debridement and granulated cancellous bone grafting. Methods Nineteen patients (20 sites)of infected nonunion with large skeletal defects in tibiae (n = 18) or ulna/radii (n =2) , 18 males and 1 female aged 31.3 (8-51), were treated with debridement,external fixation, and granulated cancellous bone grafting,14 patients (15 sites) by cancellous bone autografting and 5 patients (5 sites) by cancellous bone allografting. Follow-up was conducted for 32. 7 (20 - 56) months. Results Out of the 5 patients receiving allogra-fting, 3 gained bone union with an external fixator index of ( 2. 22 ± 0. 84 ) months/cm, 2 developed nonunion and subsequently gained union after receiving cancellous bone autografting, and no infection recurrence all of the 5 patients were found. Out of the 14 patients (15 sites) undergoing autografting, 2 patients (2 sites, 13. 3% )developed nonunion due to recurrent infection resulting in absorption of autograft, subsequently received debridement and autograftiug once again, and gained bone union and infection eradication; 12 patients ( 13 sites, 86.7% ) gained bone union with an external fixator index: of (1.96 ± 0. 74) months/cm. Re-fracture occurred in 3 patients (4 sites) and was cured by using cast immobilization (1 case), external fixator (1 case), or internal fixation (1 case). Conclusion Granulated cancellous bone autografting is a suitable method for managing infected nonunion with large skeletal defects. And cancellous bone allografting has a higher incidence of re-nonunion and longer time for using external fixator.