中国综合临床
中國綜閤臨床
중국종합림상
CLINICAL MEDICINE OF CHINA
2012年
5期
526-528
,共3页
股骨粗隆间骨折%Singh指数%骨折分型
股骨粗隆間骨摺%Singh指數%骨摺分型
고골조륭간골절%Singh지수%골절분형
Inter-trochanteric femoral fracture%Singh index%Fracture type
目的 探讨Singh指数与骨折分型对股骨粗隆间骨折手术疗效的影响.方法 2007 -2010年我院收治64例粗隆间骨折患者(研究组),术前综合Singh指数与骨折分型选择固定方式,与以往127例同类患者作为对照进行比较.结果 研究组骨折愈合时间(10.5±1.2)周,对照组为(12.6±2.4)周,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t =4.27,P<0.05);研究组发生并发症3例,对照组17例,两组比较差异有统计学意义(x2=5.74,P<0.05);研究组优良率为91% (58/64);对照组为84% (107/127),两组比较差异有统计学意义(x2=6.28,P<0.05).结论 综合Singh指数与骨折分型选择股骨粗隆间骨折治疗方式具有临床应用价值.
目的 探討Singh指數與骨摺分型對股骨粗隆間骨摺手術療效的影響.方法 2007 -2010年我院收治64例粗隆間骨摺患者(研究組),術前綜閤Singh指數與骨摺分型選擇固定方式,與以往127例同類患者作為對照進行比較.結果 研究組骨摺愈閤時間(10.5±1.2)週,對照組為(12.6±2.4)週,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(t =4.27,P<0.05);研究組髮生併髮癥3例,對照組17例,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(x2=5.74,P<0.05);研究組優良率為91% (58/64);對照組為84% (107/127),兩組比較差異有統計學意義(x2=6.28,P<0.05).結論 綜閤Singh指數與骨摺分型選擇股骨粗隆間骨摺治療方式具有臨床應用價值.
목적 탐토Singh지수여골절분형대고골조륭간골절수술료효적영향.방법 2007 -2010년아원수치64례조륭간골절환자(연구조),술전종합Singh지수여골절분형선택고정방식,여이왕127례동류환자작위대조진행비교.결과 연구조골절유합시간(10.5±1.2)주,대조조위(12.6±2.4)주,량조비교차이유통계학의의(t =4.27,P<0.05);연구조발생병발증3례,대조조17례,량조비교차이유통계학의의(x2=5.74,P<0.05);연구조우량솔위91% (58/64);대조조위84% (107/127),량조비교차이유통계학의의(x2=6.28,P<0.05).결론 종합Singh지수여골절분형선택고골조륭간골절치료방식구유림상응용개치.
Objective To study the efficacy of Singhindex and fracture-type-based treatment strategy on inter-trochanter femoral fracture.Methods Sixty four patients who suffered from inter-trochanteric femoral fracture from 2007 to 2010 were recruited into this study.The pattern of fixation was determined according to the preoperative Singh index and fracture type.The efficacy of fixation was compared with that of the previously treated 127 cases in the same condition.Results The healing time of fracture in the study group was 10.5 ± 1.2 weeks,which was significantly shorter than 12.6 ± 2.4 weeks of the control group( t =4.27,P < 0.05 ).Fixationrelated complications were observed in 3 cases in the study group and 17 cases in the control group,which was statistically different between the two groups ( x2 =5.74,P < 0.05 ).The percentage of patients with excellent outcome in the study group was 91% (58/64),significantly higher than 84% ( 107/127 ) of the control group ( x2 =6.28,P < 0.05 ).Conclusion Treating the inter-trochanteric femoral fracture according to Singh index and fracture type will create improved clinical efficacy.