CAJ | 학술논문

　　宽恕制与私人执行存在着立法价值的协同、制度功能的互补以及实践效果的互斥的应然联系。但基于实践效果的互斥会对这两种制度功能的发挥产生不利影响，欧美各国都会设立一系列配套制度以割裂此种联系，这种先联系后割裂的方式是两种制度得以有效实施的路径依赖。我国的宽恕制与私人执行制度并不存在此种路径依赖，导致这两种制度在实践中无法发挥应有的效果，因此应然联系的恢复以及实践联系的割裂应作为我国完善这两种制度的方法。
　　관서제여사인집행존재착입법개치적협동、제도공능적호보이급실천효과적호척적응연련계。단기우실천효과적호척회대저량충제도공능적발휘산생불리영향，구미각국도회설립일계렬배투제도이할렬차충련계，저충선련계후할렬적방식시량충제도득이유효실시적로경의뢰。아국적관서제여사인집행제도병불존재차충로경의뢰，도치저량충제도재실천중무법발휘응유적효과，인차응연련계적회복이급실천련계적할렬응작위아국완선저량충제도적방법。
there are ought-to-be contacts between forgiveness system and private enforcement system, the collaboration of legislative value, the complement of institutional functions and the mutual exclusion of practical effect. However, based on the fact that the mutual exclusion of the practi-cal effect would adversely affect the two systems to exert functions, Europe and the United States will establish a series of supporting systems to split such links. This way, first being contacted then being fragmented, is the path dependence for the effective implementation of the two systems. The for-giveness system and private enforcement system in China have no such path dependence, so that in practice the two systems cannot achieve the de-sired effect, so the recovery of ought-to-be contact and the fragmentation of practical link should be taken as the approach perfecting the two systems.