中国糖尿病杂志
中國糖尿病雜誌
중국당뇨병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF DIABETES
2006年
6期
422-424
,共3页
刘尊永%黄海潮%邱贵莲%彭石潜%卢潭旺%郭仕林%钱荣立
劉尊永%黃海潮%邱貴蓮%彭石潛%盧潭旺%郭仕林%錢榮立
류존영%황해조%구귀련%팽석잠%로담왕%곽사림%전영립
糖尿病%糖耐量受损%筛查%检出率%漏检率%指尖血糖
糖尿病%糖耐量受損%篩查%檢齣率%漏檢率%指尖血糖
당뇨병%당내량수손%사사%검출솔%루검솔%지첨혈당
Fingertip blood glucose
目的 探讨采用空腹指尖毛细血管血血糖(FBG)≥6.1 mmol/L作为界定值筛查糖尿病(DM)和糖耐量减低(IGT)出现的偏性. 方法 筛查设A、B、C、D 四个自然人群组. 各组分别为8151、9168、9096及8355人.A、B、C三组均先做FBG,其界定值依次为6.1 mol/L、5.5 mol/L、5.0 mol/L,各组超过或等于其界定值者再做OGTT,筛查DM和IGT.D组则直接做OGTT筛查DM和IGT.DM和IGT诊断按照WHO1999年标准. 结果 A、B、C、D 四组DM的检出率分别为6.91%、8.21%、8.30%、8.32%,IGT的检出率分别为2.48%、6.10%、 8.05%、 8.16%.A组行OGTT的人数比例占被调查总人群的11.3%,与D组比较,DM、IGT漏检率分别为 16.95%、69.61%;B组行OGTT的人数比例占被调查总人群的27.79%,与D组比较,DM、IGT漏检率分别为1.32%和25.25%; C组行OGTT的人数比例占被调查总人群的58.37%,与D组比较,DM、IGT漏检率分别为0.24%和1.35%. 结论 选择FBG≥5.0 mmol/L作为界定值,是开展糖尿病流行病学调查获得DM和IGT患病率的成本-效益-效果最佳方案.
目的 探討採用空腹指尖毛細血管血血糖(FBG)≥6.1 mmol/L作為界定值篩查糖尿病(DM)和糖耐量減低(IGT)齣現的偏性. 方法 篩查設A、B、C、D 四箇自然人群組. 各組分彆為8151、9168、9096及8355人.A、B、C三組均先做FBG,其界定值依次為6.1 mol/L、5.5 mol/L、5.0 mol/L,各組超過或等于其界定值者再做OGTT,篩查DM和IGT.D組則直接做OGTT篩查DM和IGT.DM和IGT診斷按照WHO1999年標準. 結果 A、B、C、D 四組DM的檢齣率分彆為6.91%、8.21%、8.30%、8.32%,IGT的檢齣率分彆為2.48%、6.10%、 8.05%、 8.16%.A組行OGTT的人數比例佔被調查總人群的11.3%,與D組比較,DM、IGT漏檢率分彆為 16.95%、69.61%;B組行OGTT的人數比例佔被調查總人群的27.79%,與D組比較,DM、IGT漏檢率分彆為1.32%和25.25%; C組行OGTT的人數比例佔被調查總人群的58.37%,與D組比較,DM、IGT漏檢率分彆為0.24%和1.35%. 結論 選擇FBG≥5.0 mmol/L作為界定值,是開展糖尿病流行病學調查穫得DM和IGT患病率的成本-效益-效果最佳方案.
목적 탐토채용공복지첨모세혈관혈혈당(FBG)≥6.1 mmol/L작위계정치사사당뇨병(DM)화당내량감저(IGT)출현적편성. 방법 사사설A、B、C、D 사개자연인군조. 각조분별위8151、9168、9096급8355인.A、B、C삼조균선주FBG,기계정치의차위6.1 mol/L、5.5 mol/L、5.0 mol/L,각조초과혹등우기계정치자재주OGTT,사사DM화IGT.D조칙직접주OGTT사사DM화IGT.DM화IGT진단안조WHO1999년표준. 결과 A、B、C、D 사조DM적검출솔분별위6.91%、8.21%、8.30%、8.32%,IGT적검출솔분별위2.48%、6.10%、 8.05%、 8.16%.A조행OGTT적인수비례점피조사총인군적11.3%,여D조비교,DM、IGT루검솔분별위 16.95%、69.61%;B조행OGTT적인수비례점피조사총인군적27.79%,여D조비교,DM、IGT루검솔분별위1.32%화25.25%; C조행OGTT적인수비례점피조사총인군적58.37%,여D조비교,DM、IGT루검솔분별위0.24%화1.35%. 결론 선택FBG≥5.0 mmol/L작위계정치,시개전당뇨병류행병학조사획득DM화IGT환병솔적성본-효익-효과최가방안.
Objective To study the deflection of screening diabetes and IGT by fasting fingertip blood glucose.Methods The people(n=34 770) aged 40~74 years from Baoan district of Shenzhen city in China were randomized into A,B,C and D groups.When the fasting fingertip blood glucose exceeded the defined values of A group≥6.1 mmol/L,B group ≥5.5 mmol/L,C group ≥5.0 mmol/L,the blood glucose of the people was measured after 2 h oral glucose load(75 g in 250~300 ml of water for adults), but the blood glucose of all the D group people was measured after 2 h oral glucose load.The 1985 WHO criteria was used to diagnose DM and IGT.Results The detection rates of DM and IGT of A,B,C and D groups were 6.91%,8.21%,8.30%,8.32% and 2.48%,6.10%,8.05%,8.16% respectively. The proportion of oral glucose load in A group was 11.6%,and the escape rates of DM and IGT were 16.95%,69.61% respectively.The proportion of oral glucose load in B group was 27.79%,and the escape rates of DM and IGT were 1.32% and 25.25% respectively.The practice proportion of oral glucose load in C group was 58.37%,and the escape rates of DM and IGT were 0.24% and 1.35% respectively.Conclusion The escape rates of DM and IGT were 16.95% and 69.23%;1.32% and 25.25%;and 0.24% and 1.35%,when the fasting fingertip blood glucose(≥6.1,) ≥5.5,and ≥5.0 mmol/L respectively.It is better methods for cost-effect ratio to choose the fasting fingertip blood glucose ≥5.0 mmol/L as oral glucose load indicator in filtration tests for type 2 diabetes.