环境科学研究
環境科學研究
배경과학연구
RSEARCH OF ENUIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
2009年
11期
1299-1304
,共6页
谢明辉%李丽%黄泽春%朱雪梅%张冀飞%孙体昌
謝明輝%李麗%黃澤春%硃雪梅%張冀飛%孫體昌
사명휘%리려%황택춘%주설매%장기비%손체창
纸塑铝复合包装%生命周期评价%环境影响%处置方式
紙塑鋁複閤包裝%生命週期評價%環境影響%處置方式
지소려복합포장%생명주기평개%배경영향%처치방식
Al-PE-Pa laminated package%life cycle assessment (LCA)%environmental impact%waste treatment
采用生命周期评价(LCA)法研究了纸塑铝复合包装的全生命周期环境影响,并在处置阶段对不同处置方式的环境影响进行评价. 通过现场和资料调研的方式,获得所有生命周期阶段能量物质的输入/输出和环境外排数据. 结果表明:纸塑铝复合包装生命周期阶段中环境影响比重最大的是原料获取阶段,占75%以上. 纸塑铝复合包装的全生命周期环境影响主要集中在化石燃料、土地占用和无机物对人体损害3个方面,在矿产资源、气候变化、酸化富营养化和生态毒性方面影响稍小. 3种处置方式对环境影响由大到小依次为填埋>焚烧>再生,其中填埋和焚烧处置分别比纸塑铝复合包装处置阶段前的环境影响增加11%和7%,再生可降低23%,而进一步降低环境影响的方式为发展铝塑分离技术.
採用生命週期評價(LCA)法研究瞭紙塑鋁複閤包裝的全生命週期環境影響,併在處置階段對不同處置方式的環境影響進行評價. 通過現場和資料調研的方式,穫得所有生命週期階段能量物質的輸入/輸齣和環境外排數據. 結果錶明:紙塑鋁複閤包裝生命週期階段中環境影響比重最大的是原料穫取階段,佔75%以上. 紙塑鋁複閤包裝的全生命週期環境影響主要集中在化石燃料、土地佔用和無機物對人體損害3箇方麵,在礦產資源、氣候變化、痠化富營養化和生態毒性方麵影響稍小. 3種處置方式對環境影響由大到小依次為填埋>焚燒>再生,其中填埋和焚燒處置分彆比紙塑鋁複閤包裝處置階段前的環境影響增加11%和7%,再生可降低23%,而進一步降低環境影響的方式為髮展鋁塑分離技術.
채용생명주기평개(LCA)법연구료지소려복합포장적전생명주기배경영향,병재처치계단대불동처치방식적배경영향진행평개. 통과현장화자료조연적방식,획득소유생명주기계단능량물질적수입/수출화배경외배수거. 결과표명:지소려복합포장생명주기계단중배경영향비중최대적시원료획취계단,점75%이상. 지소려복합포장적전생명주기배경영향주요집중재화석연료、토지점용화무궤물대인체손해3개방면,재광산자원、기후변화、산화부영양화화생태독성방면영향초소. 3충처치방식대배경영향유대도소의차위전매>분소>재생,기중전매화분소처치분별비지소려복합포장처치계단전적배경영향증가11%화7%,재생가강저23%,이진일보강저배경영향적방식위발전려소분리기술.
Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to examine the environmental impacts over the life cycle of Al-PE-Pa laminated packaging, and to compare the environmental impacts from different laminated package waste treatments. The data of mass and energy fluxes and the environmental emissions were obtained from the literature and from site investigations. The results showed that the environmental impact from the raw material supply period was the highest, over 75%, of the total environmental impacts over the life cycle. The environmental impacts mainly come from fossil fuel consumption, land occupation and respiratory effects damage from inorganic substances. The contributions from mineral resource consumption, climate change, acidification/eutrophication and ecotoxicity were less. The environmental impacts from laminated package waste disposal were highest in landfill treatment followed by incineration and recycling. Landfill and incineration could account for an additional environmental impact of 11% and 7%, respectively, compared to that before the laminated packaging enters waste stream. In contrast, recycling could reduce 23% of the environmental impact, and the reduction could be even more significant if the aluminum and plastic were recycled separately.