中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2010年
32期
3871-3873
,共3页
截瘫%社会支持%应付方式%生活质量
截癱%社會支持%應付方式%生活質量
절탄%사회지지%응부방식%생활질량
Paraplegia%Social support%Coping style%Life quality
目的 探讨社会支持对外伤性截瘫患者应付方式及生活质量的影响.方法 将60例患者以社会支持评分(SSRS)分组,社会支持总分<35分为低社会支持组,>45分为高社会支持组,比较两组应付问卷(WOCS)、世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQCL-BREF)评分情况,并进行相关分析.结果 60例外伤性截瘫患者SSRS总分及主观支持、客观支持、支持利用度因子评分分别为(38.28±4.92),(23.28±5.21),(11.22±3.16),(8.54±1.97)分.其中<35分者(低分组)22例;>45分者(高分组)17例;35～45分者21例.社会支持高分组外伤性截瘫患者生理领域、心理领域、社会关系领域、环境领域评分均高于社会支持低分组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01).结论 社会支持程度对伤性截瘫患者应付方式及生活质量具有重要影响,良好的社会支持有助于患者采取积极地应付方式,提高患者的生活质量.
目的 探討社會支持對外傷性截癱患者應付方式及生活質量的影響.方法 將60例患者以社會支持評分(SSRS)分組,社會支持總分<35分為低社會支持組,>45分為高社會支持組,比較兩組應付問捲(WOCS)、世界衛生組織生存質量測定量錶簡錶(WHOQCL-BREF)評分情況,併進行相關分析.結果 60例外傷性截癱患者SSRS總分及主觀支持、客觀支持、支持利用度因子評分分彆為(38.28±4.92),(23.28±5.21),(11.22±3.16),(8.54±1.97)分.其中<35分者(低分組)22例;>45分者(高分組)17例;35～45分者21例.社會支持高分組外傷性截癱患者生理領域、心理領域、社會關繫領域、環境領域評分均高于社會支持低分組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05或P<0.01).結論 社會支持程度對傷性截癱患者應付方式及生活質量具有重要影響,良好的社會支持有助于患者採取積極地應付方式,提高患者的生活質量.
목적 탐토사회지지대외상성절탄환자응부방식급생활질량적영향.방법 장60례환자이사회지지평분(SSRS)분조,사회지지총분<35분위저사회지지조,>45분위고사회지지조,비교량조응부문권(WOCS)、세계위생조직생존질량측정량표간표(WHOQCL-BREF)평분정황,병진행상관분석.결과 60예외상성절탄환자SSRS총분급주관지지、객관지지、지지이용도인자평분분별위(38.28±4.92),(23.28±5.21),(11.22±3.16),(8.54±1.97)분.기중<35분자(저분조)22례;>45분자(고분조)17례;35～45분자21례.사회지지고분조외상성절탄환자생리영역、심리영역、사회관계영역、배경영역평분균고우사회지지저분조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05혹P<0.01).결론 사회지지정도대상성절탄환자응부방식급생활질량구유중요영향,량호적사회지지유조우환자채취적겁지응부방식,제고환자적생활질량.
Objective To investigate the impact of social support on coping style and life quality of patients with traumatic paraplegia. Methods According to social support rating scale (SSRS), 60 cases were divided into two groups: low social support group (total social support score lower than 35) and high social support group (total social support score higher than 45). Scores of WOCS and WHOQCL-BREF were compared between the two groups and correlation analysis was conducted. Results Average scores of SSRS, subjective support, objective support and support utilization of the 60 cases were (38.28 ± 4.92), (23.28 ± 5.21),(11.22 ±3.16) and (8.54 ± 1.97), respectively. There were 22 cases lower than 35 points (low score group), 17 cases higher than 45 points (high score group), and 21cases between 35 and 45 points. Scores of physiological, psychological, social relations and environment dimension of the high social support group was significantly higher than those of the low social support group, and there was significant difference(P <0. 05 or P <0. 01). Conclusions The degree of social support has an important impact on coping style and life quality of traumatic paraplegia patients. Well social support helps patients take active behaviors and improve the quality of life.
