中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志
中華耳鼻嚥喉頭頸外科雜誌
중화이비인후두경외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
2011年
9期
709-711
,共3页
张正文%康深松%谢锋%马腾霄%李磊%翟弘峰%侴海燕%李昊%钟爱梅%张栋益
張正文%康深鬆%謝鋒%馬騰霄%李磊%翟弘峰%侴海燕%李昊%鐘愛梅%張棟益
장정문%강심송%사봉%마등소%리뢰%적홍봉%호해연%리호%종애매%장동익
耳%先天畸形%耳外科手术%外科皮瓣%耳廓%修复外科手术
耳%先天畸形%耳外科手術%外科皮瓣%耳廓%脩複外科手術
이%선천기형%이외과수술%외과피판%이곽%수복외과수술
Ear%Congenital abnormalities%Otologic surgical procedures%Surgical flaps%Ear auricles%Reconstructive surgical procedures
目的 探讨改良Ⅱ期法耳廓再造的方法并总结6年来的临床应用经验。方法 对146例(155耳)小耳畸形患者行耳廓再造术,手术分Ⅱ期进行。Ⅰ期:采用“U”形切口,切除残耳,在耳后分离合适的腔隙,置入肋软骨耳支架,耳垂向后转位衔接于再造的耳廓下方。6个月后行Ⅱ期手术:掀起耳廓,耳后置入软骨块,颞浅筋膜瓣转移覆盖后行中厚皮片移植术。结果 146例患者中141例(150耳)Ⅰ期术后恢复顺利,伤口愈合良好;5例(5耳)Ⅰ期术后4~6d出现皮瓣尖端坏死,范围约1.0 cm×1.5 cm,经换药后痊愈,未出现软骨外露、感染等;139例(147耳)Ⅱ期术后耳后移植皮片成活良好,7例(8耳)Ⅱ期术后出现耳后移植皮片部分成活不良,换药1周后愈合。146例患者随访94例(97耳),失访52例(58耳),随访时间为术后6个月至2年,随访病例均无感染、软骨吸收等并发症,再造耳廓结构清晰,耳颅角稳定。结论 改良Ⅱ期法耳廓再造手术操作相对简单,易于掌握,是耳廓再造的较为理想的方法之一。
目的 探討改良Ⅱ期法耳廓再造的方法併總結6年來的臨床應用經驗。方法 對146例(155耳)小耳畸形患者行耳廓再造術,手術分Ⅱ期進行。Ⅰ期:採用“U”形切口,切除殘耳,在耳後分離閤適的腔隙,置入肋軟骨耳支架,耳垂嚮後轉位銜接于再造的耳廓下方。6箇月後行Ⅱ期手術:掀起耳廓,耳後置入軟骨塊,顳淺觔膜瓣轉移覆蓋後行中厚皮片移植術。結果 146例患者中141例(150耳)Ⅰ期術後恢複順利,傷口愈閤良好;5例(5耳)Ⅰ期術後4~6d齣現皮瓣尖耑壞死,範圍約1.0 cm×1.5 cm,經換藥後痊愈,未齣現軟骨外露、感染等;139例(147耳)Ⅱ期術後耳後移植皮片成活良好,7例(8耳)Ⅱ期術後齣現耳後移植皮片部分成活不良,換藥1週後愈閤。146例患者隨訪94例(97耳),失訪52例(58耳),隨訪時間為術後6箇月至2年,隨訪病例均無感染、軟骨吸收等併髮癥,再造耳廓結構清晰,耳顱角穩定。結論 改良Ⅱ期法耳廓再造手術操作相對簡單,易于掌握,是耳廓再造的較為理想的方法之一。
목적 탐토개량Ⅱ기법이곽재조적방법병총결6년래적림상응용경험。방법 대146례(155이)소이기형환자행이곽재조술,수술분Ⅱ기진행。Ⅰ기:채용“U”형절구,절제잔이,재이후분리합괄적강극,치입륵연골이지가,이수향후전위함접우재조적이곽하방。6개월후행Ⅱ기수술:흔기이곽,이후치입연골괴,섭천근막판전이복개후행중후피편이식술。결과 146례환자중141례(150이)Ⅰ기술후회복순리,상구유합량호;5례(5이)Ⅰ기술후4~6d출현피판첨단배사,범위약1.0 cm×1.5 cm,경환약후전유,미출현연골외로、감염등;139례(147이)Ⅱ기술후이후이식피편성활량호,7례(8이)Ⅱ기술후출현이후이식피편부분성활불량,환약1주후유합。146례환자수방94례(97이),실방52례(58이),수방시간위술후6개월지2년,수방병례균무감염、연골흡수등병발증,재조이곽결구청석,이로각은정。결론 개량Ⅱ기법이곽재조수술조작상대간단,역우장악,시이곽재조적교위이상적방법지일。
Objective To introduce a modified surgery for total auriculoplasty and the experience in one hundred and forty-six cases( 155 ears). Methods The procedure was a two-stage operation. The first stage involved fabrication and grafting of a costal cartilage framework. A U-shaped skin incision was made on the posterior edge of the Iobule and the remnant ear cartilage was removed completely. The area for the insertion of the cartilage framework was undermined. Skin flaps were sutured after insertion of the eatilage framework. The second-stage surgery was usually performed six months after the first-stage operation. The reconstructed auricle was elevated, and a costal cartilage block was fixed to the posterior part of the auricle.A temporoparietal fascia flap was then used to cover the costal cartilage block. Finally, the posterior aspect of the projected auricle was covered with a spit-thickness skin graft. Results The incisions healed in one hundred and forty-one patients ( 150 ears) after the first stage operation. Partial necrosis of the postauricular flap was observed in five cases (5 ears)after the first stage operation, but no exposure or absorption of the cartilage took place. The skin grafts survived in one hundred and thirty-nine cases ( 147 ears) after the second-stage surgery. Partial necrosis of the skin graft was observed in seven cases(8 ears), but healed after one-week of dressing changes. Ninty-four cases (97 ears) were followed up, but fifty-two cases (58 ears)were lost to follow up. The follow-up at six months to two years showed satisfactory contour and projection of the constructed ears. Conclusion This two-stage surgery is simple and ideal for auricloplasty with few complications.