实用口腔医学杂志
實用口腔醫學雜誌
실용구강의학잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL STOMATOLOGY
2009年
6期
791-793
,共3页
殷家悦%王飞%包扬%艾红军
慇傢悅%王飛%包颺%艾紅軍
은가열%왕비%포양%애홍군
牙龈色%比色仪%色差
牙齦色%比色儀%色差
아간색%비색의%색차
Gingival shade%Shade-matching device%Chromatism
目的:通过体外模拟实验评价牙龈比色板在临床比色中的意义.方法:使用分光光度计型全牙比色仪Shadepilot测量42 个比色板色标在4 种牙龈比色板(Gumy1,2,3,4)衬托下颈、中、切3 部分色彩参数(CIE1976L*a*b*),使用比色仪内置软件计算有无牙龈比色板衬托的色标相同位置的色差值(△E),分析牙龈色对色标颜色的影响.结果:42 个色标在4 种牙龈色衬托下与无牙龈色衬托的色差值为:颈部(2.93±0.79)NBS, 中部(0.51±0.27)NBS,切端(0.61±0.29)NBS;Gumy-1、2、3、4 组牙龈色对色标颈、中、切三部分的影响组间差异无显著性(P>0.05).结论:在模拟测量条件下,牙龈色对比色板色标颈部有影响,肉眼可识别,对色标中部及切端无影响;4 种模拟牙龈颜色对比色板色标颜色的影响无统计学差异.
目的:通過體外模擬實驗評價牙齦比色闆在臨床比色中的意義.方法:使用分光光度計型全牙比色儀Shadepilot測量42 箇比色闆色標在4 種牙齦比色闆(Gumy1,2,3,4)襯託下頸、中、切3 部分色綵參數(CIE1976L*a*b*),使用比色儀內置軟件計算有無牙齦比色闆襯託的色標相同位置的色差值(△E),分析牙齦色對色標顏色的影響.結果:42 箇色標在4 種牙齦色襯託下與無牙齦色襯託的色差值為:頸部(2.93±0.79)NBS, 中部(0.51±0.27)NBS,切耑(0.61±0.29)NBS;Gumy-1、2、3、4 組牙齦色對色標頸、中、切三部分的影響組間差異無顯著性(P>0.05).結論:在模擬測量條件下,牙齦色對比色闆色標頸部有影響,肉眼可識彆,對色標中部及切耑無影響;4 種模擬牙齦顏色對比色闆色標顏色的影響無統計學差異.
목적:통과체외모의실험평개아간비색판재림상비색중적의의.방법:사용분광광도계형전아비색의Shadepilot측량42 개비색판색표재4 충아간비색판(Gumy1,2,3,4)츤탁하경、중、절3 부분색채삼수(CIE1976L*a*b*),사용비색의내치연건계산유무아간비색판츤탁적색표상동위치적색차치(△E),분석아간색대색표안색적영향.결과:42 개색표재4 충아간색츤탁하여무아간색츤탁적색차치위:경부(2.93±0.79)NBS, 중부(0.51±0.27)NBS,절단(0.61±0.29)NBS;Gumy-1、2、3、4 조아간색대색표경、중、절삼부분적영향조간차이무현저성(P>0.05).결론:재모의측량조건하,아간색대비색판색표경부유영향,육안가식별,대색표중부급절단무영향;4 충모의아간안색대비색판색표안색적영향무통계학차이.
Objective; To evaluate the effects of gingival shade guide in visual shade-matching in vitro models. Methods; 42 tabs of Shofu NCC shade guide were adopted for color measuring. Each tab was fixed in the middle of Gingiva-Indicator, Guray(1,2,3,4) respectively and located in a black box. The measurements were made using the Shadepilot instrument. The color parameters ( CIE1976L * a * b * ) of cervical, body, incisal area of each tab were recorded. The color difference A E value in the same position of each tab was calculated between non-gingival shade guide group and Gumyl ,2,3,4 groups with Shadepilot software. Results; The AE value in the same position of 42 tabs between non-gingival shade guide group and 4 gingival shade guide groups were; cervical (2.93±0.79)NBS,body(0.51±0.27)NBS and incisal(0.61 ±0.29)NBS. In the cervical, body and incisal area, there was no statistically difference among Gumyl ,2,3,4 groups on affecting shade of tabs(P >0. 05). Conclusion; The gingival color has an effect on the cervical shade of tabs, and it can be recognized by human eyes, while gingival color has little effect on the shade of body and incisal area.