中华普通外科杂志
中華普通外科雜誌
중화보통외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GENERAL SURGERY
2009年
4期
295-299
,共5页
廖志学%文天夫%陈哲宇%严律南%杨健%吕波%吴国长%张宇
廖誌學%文天伕%陳哲宇%嚴律南%楊健%呂波%吳國長%張宇
료지학%문천부%진철우%엄률남%양건%려파%오국장%장우
肝切除术%治疗效果%半肝血流阻断%Pringle's法
肝切除術%治療效果%半肝血流阻斷%Pringle's法
간절제술%치료효과%반간혈류조단%Pringle's법
Hepatectomy%Treatment outcome%Hemihepatic inflow occlusion%Pringle's maneuver
目的 评价在肝切除术中连续性半肝血流阻断(hemihepatic inflow occlusion,HH)与间歇性全肝血流阻断(total hepatic inflow occlusion,TH)的安全性和有效性.方法 将80例肝肿瘤患者分为HH组(40例)和TH组(40例).术中施行肝切除时,HH组患者采用连续阻断血流的方式,TH组患者采用阻断血流20 min、复流5 min的阻断方式.测量2组患者的术中出血量和肝断面面积,术后1、3、7 d测定肝功能,并记录术后并发症情况.结果 HH组比TH组的肝总缺血时间长,分别为[(42±13)min,(31±13)min,P=0.00],HH组的手术时间(236±49)min比TH组(204±38)min的时间长(P=0.02).两组患者断肝出血量分别为(500±269)ml与(416±235)ml,差异无统计学意义(P=0.14),术后第1天ALT与AST升高水平比较,二组差异无统计学意义[(ALT:(677 ±572)IU/L,(577±327)IU/L,P=0.12;AST:(591±468)IU/L,(512±301)IU/L,P=0.66)].两组患者术后并发症发生率相近(分别为22.5%和20.0%,P=0.35).结论 在肝切除中,连续性半肝血流阻断与间歇性全肝血流阻断同样安全和有效.
目的 評價在肝切除術中連續性半肝血流阻斷(hemihepatic inflow occlusion,HH)與間歇性全肝血流阻斷(total hepatic inflow occlusion,TH)的安全性和有效性.方法 將80例肝腫瘤患者分為HH組(40例)和TH組(40例).術中施行肝切除時,HH組患者採用連續阻斷血流的方式,TH組患者採用阻斷血流20 min、複流5 min的阻斷方式.測量2組患者的術中齣血量和肝斷麵麵積,術後1、3、7 d測定肝功能,併記錄術後併髮癥情況.結果 HH組比TH組的肝總缺血時間長,分彆為[(42±13)min,(31±13)min,P=0.00],HH組的手術時間(236±49)min比TH組(204±38)min的時間長(P=0.02).兩組患者斷肝齣血量分彆為(500±269)ml與(416±235)ml,差異無統計學意義(P=0.14),術後第1天ALT與AST升高水平比較,二組差異無統計學意義[(ALT:(677 ±572)IU/L,(577±327)IU/L,P=0.12;AST:(591±468)IU/L,(512±301)IU/L,P=0.66)].兩組患者術後併髮癥髮生率相近(分彆為22.5%和20.0%,P=0.35).結論 在肝切除中,連續性半肝血流阻斷與間歇性全肝血流阻斷同樣安全和有效.
목적 평개재간절제술중련속성반간혈류조단(hemihepatic inflow occlusion,HH)여간헐성전간혈류조단(total hepatic inflow occlusion,TH)적안전성화유효성.방법 장80례간종류환자분위HH조(40례)화TH조(40례).술중시행간절제시,HH조환자채용련속조단혈류적방식,TH조환자채용조단혈류20 min、복류5 min적조단방식.측량2조환자적술중출혈량화간단면면적,술후1、3、7 d측정간공능,병기록술후병발증정황.결과 HH조비TH조적간총결혈시간장,분별위[(42±13)min,(31±13)min,P=0.00],HH조적수술시간(236±49)min비TH조(204±38)min적시간장(P=0.02).량조환자단간출혈량분별위(500±269)ml여(416±235)ml,차이무통계학의의(P=0.14),술후제1천ALT여AST승고수평비교,이조차이무통계학의의[(ALT:(677 ±572)IU/L,(577±327)IU/L,P=0.12;AST:(591±468)IU/L,(512±301)IU/L,P=0.66)].량조환자술후병발증발생솔상근(분별위22.5%화20.0%,P=0.35).결론 재간절제중,련속성반간혈류조단여간헐성전간혈류조단동양안전화유효.
Objective To evaluate if continuous hemihepatic inflow occlusion(HH)during hepatectomy can be as safe and effective as intermittent total hepatic inflow occlusion(TH)in reducing blood loss during hepatectomy.Methods From November 2001 to March 2006.eighty patients undergoing liver resections were included in a prospective randomized study comparning the intra-and postoperative course underTH(n=40)or HH(n=40).TH was performed with periods of 20 minutes of occlusion and 5 minutes of releasing,while HH with continuous occlusion.The surface area of liver transection was measured and blood loss was calculated.The amount of blood loss,levels of alanine aminotransferuse (ALT)and aspartate aminotransferase(AST),and postoperative course were recorded. Results The total ischemic time of the HH groups was longer than in the TH group[(42±13)min,(31±13)min,P=0.37],and the operative time in the HH group was longer than in the TH group[(236 ±49)min,(204±38)min,P=0.02 ].No signincant difierenee was found between HH and TH group in blood loss during liver parenchyma transection[(500 ±269)ml,(416 ±235)ml,P=0.14]and in the changes of ALT and AST on the first postoperative day[ALT:(677±572)IU/L,(577 ±327)IU/L,P=0.12;AST:(591 ±468)IU/L,(512±301)IU/L,P=0.66].There were no difierences on postoperative morbidity between the two groups(22.5%versus 20.0%,P=0.35).Conclusion The technique of continuous hemihepatic inflow occlusion is as safe and effective as intermittent total hepatic inflow occlusion.