中华实验外科杂志
中華實驗外科雜誌
중화실험외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY
2010年
11期
1639-1641
,共3页
金伟%蔡林%胡昊%张翼%平安松%栾夏刚%朱晓彬%王冶
金偉%蔡林%鬍昊%張翼%平安鬆%欒夏剛%硃曉彬%王冶
금위%채림%호호%장익%평안송%란하강%주효빈%왕야
骨盆骨折%垂直不稳定%椎弓根钉棒%生物力学
骨盆骨摺%垂直不穩定%椎弓根釘棒%生物力學
골분골절%수직불은정%추궁근정봉%생물역학
Pelvic fracture%Vertical instability%Pedicle screw system%Biomechanic
目的 探讨改良钉棒系统治疗垂直不稳定型骨盆骨折,并分析其生物力学性质.方法 在8例尸体骨盆标本上造模成垂直不稳定型骨盆骨折,分别行TOS术式固定、骶髂螺钉固定、改良钉棒系统固定,检测1000 N载荷下骨盆刚度、骨折分离移位距离及局部应变改变.结果 骨盆标本骨折模型采用各种不同固定方式,经生物力学测试,改良钉棒系统在载荷1000 N下刚度(224.3±18.3)N/mm及骨折分离移位距离(1.98±0.24)mm,明显优于骶髂螺钉固定(169.10±17.60)、(8.08±0.71)mm,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),与TOS(233.20±12.90)、(1.62±0.31)mm比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 改良钉棒系统是一种生物力学性能较好的治疗垂直不稳定型骨盆骨折的新方法.
目的 探討改良釘棒繫統治療垂直不穩定型骨盆骨摺,併分析其生物力學性質.方法 在8例尸體骨盆標本上造模成垂直不穩定型骨盆骨摺,分彆行TOS術式固定、骶髂螺釘固定、改良釘棒繫統固定,檢測1000 N載荷下骨盆剛度、骨摺分離移位距離及跼部應變改變.結果 骨盆標本骨摺模型採用各種不同固定方式,經生物力學測試,改良釘棒繫統在載荷1000 N下剛度(224.3±18.3)N/mm及骨摺分離移位距離(1.98±0.24)mm,明顯優于骶髂螺釘固定(169.10±17.60)、(8.08±0.71)mm,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01),與TOS(233.20±12.90)、(1.62±0.31)mm比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 改良釘棒繫統是一種生物力學性能較好的治療垂直不穩定型骨盆骨摺的新方法.
목적 탐토개량정봉계통치료수직불은정형골분골절,병분석기생물역학성질.방법 재8례시체골분표본상조모성수직불은정형골분골절,분별행TOS술식고정、저가라정고정、개량정봉계통고정,검측1000 N재하하골분강도、골절분리이위거리급국부응변개변.결과 골분표본골절모형채용각충불동고정방식,경생물역학측시,개량정봉계통재재하1000 N하강도(224.3±18.3)N/mm급골절분리이위거리(1.98±0.24)mm,명현우우저가라정고정(169.10±17.60)、(8.08±0.71)mm,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),여TOS(233.20±12.90)、(1.62±0.31)mm비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 개량정봉계통시일충생물역학성능교호적치료수직불은정형골분골절적신방법.
Objective To evaluate the biomechanical properties of posterior pelvic fixation by pedicle screw system. Methods In 8 human cadaver pelvises, biomechanical testing in a double-leg-stance model of vertically unstable pelvic fracture was done by material testing machine. Cadavers were loaded with 1000 N stress. In cadavers, three fixation methods-pedicle screw system, triangular osteosynthesis (TOS) and iliosacral screw-were assessed for stiffness and separation displacement. Results Stiffness for TOS, pedicle screw and screw was (233. 2 ± 12. 9), (224. 3 ± 18. 3) and ( 169. 1 ± 17.6) N/mm, respectively. ANOVA showed significant difference between pedicle screw system and iliosacral screw, but not between pedicle screw and TOS ( P > 0. 05 ). Separation displacement was ( 1.62 ± 0. 31 ) mm(TOS), ( 1.98 ± 0. 24) mm ( pedicle screw system), ( 8.08 ± 0. 71 ) mm ( iliosacral screw) respectively.Pedicle screw system differed significantly from iliosacral screw ( P < 0. 01 ), but not from TOS ( P >0. 05). Conclusion Pedicle screw system successfully treats vertically unstable pelvic fractures biomechanically.