体育研究与教育
體育研究與教育
체육연구여교육
Journal of Physical Education Institute of Shanxi Teachers University
2011年
6期
100-103
,共4页
刮痧%按摩%延迟性肌肉酸痛%治疗%比较
颳痧%按摩%延遲性肌肉痠痛%治療%比較
괄사%안마%연지성기육산통%치료%비교
scrapping%massage%delayed-onset muscle soreness%therapy%comparison
采用中医刮痧、按摩治疗延迟性肌肉酸痛症,并对治疗效果进行比较,结果表明：刮痧和按摩治疗延迟性肌肉酸痛均有明显疗效,其中刮痧组有效率为95.84%,按摩组有效率为96.15%。两组相比较,刮痧组见效更快（P〈0.01）。
採用中醫颳痧、按摩治療延遲性肌肉痠痛癥,併對治療效果進行比較,結果錶明：颳痧和按摩治療延遲性肌肉痠痛均有明顯療效,其中颳痧組有效率為95.84%,按摩組有效率為96.15%。兩組相比較,颳痧組見效更快（P〈0.01）。
채용중의괄사、안마치료연지성기육산통증,병대치료효과진행비교,결과표명：괄사화안마치료연지성기육산통균유명현료효,기중괄사조유효솔위95.84%,안마조유효솔위96.15%。량조상비교,괄사조견효경쾌（P〈0.01）。
This thesis focuses on the experimental study on comparison of traditional Chinese scrapping therapy and massage treatment for Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness （DOMS）. The experiment result indicates： both of them are workable solutions ; while the response rate of scrapping therapy group was 95.84%, the response rate of massage treatment group was 96.15% ;compared with massage treatment, scrapping therapy is much more effective （P 〈 O. O1 ）.
