CAJ | 학술논문

目前在中国的规划理论界有一种声音,认为高架桥是城市发展的一个过程产物,它终将被拆除和消失,并以清溪川复原工程等案例作为这一结论的佐证。同时,在美国纽约的高线公园案例中,出现了另一种对待废弃高架桥的方式,保留高架桥作为步行公园使用,而不是单纯暴力地拆除。在案例研究的基础上,作者尝试提出了五个方面的因素,希望可以作为未来高架桥发展的参考与借鉴。
목전재중국적규화이론계유일충성음,인위고가교시성시발전적일개과정산물,타종장피탁제화소실,병이청계천복원공정등안례작위저일결론적좌증。동시,재미국뉴약적고선공완안례중,출현료령일충대대폐기고가교적방식,보류고가교작위보행공완사용,이불시단순폭력지탁제。재안례연구적기출상,작자상시제출료오개방면적인소,희망가이작위미래고가교발전적삼고여차감。
Currently in China,planning theorists have a voice,that the viaduct is the product of a process of urban development,which will eventually be removed and demolished,and the Cheonggyecheon restoration project as important evidence for this conclusion.Meanwhile,in New York＇s the High Line Park case,the emergence of another way to deal with abandoned viaduct,retaining the viaduct as the use of the park on foot,rather than simply removed violently.Based on case studies,the author tries to find five factors,which is hoped for being taken as references and experiences for the development of the viaduct in the future.