中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2009年
22期
1-3
,共3页
游励红%熊子波%姜金航%李成剑%曾小婷%刘正翠%杜娟
遊勵紅%熊子波%薑金航%李成劍%曾小婷%劉正翠%杜娟
유려홍%웅자파%강금항%리성검%증소정%류정취%두연
血液透析%透析器复用%透析器血室容积
血液透析%透析器複用%透析器血室容積
혈액투석%투석기복용%투석기혈실용적
Hemodialysis%Hemedialyzer reuse%Total cell volume
目的 探讨不同检测方法对透析器血室容积(TCV)检测值的影响.方法 对60支可重复使用的透析器(低通量透析器和高通量透析器各30支),按检测方法不同分为传统检测组、改良检测组和复用机检测组3组各20支,分别采用传统检测法、改良检测法和复用机检测法对透析器使用前、后行TCV检测,并对结果进行比较.结果 传统检测组、改良检测组和复用机检测组测量6LR透析器和17 R透析器TCV基础值分别为(100.10±0.25)ml、(100.13±0.50)ml、(102.00±1.41)ml和(113.67±1.30)ml、(118.67±1.30)ml、(119.93±1.77)ml;对重复使用后6LR透析器和17 R透析器进行TCV检测,检测值分别为(95.20±7.76)ml、(96.20±7.22)ml、(102.80±4.26)ml和(100.00±11.48)ml、(114.35±3.31)ml、(117.07±2.96)ml;改良检测组与传统检测组对重复使用高通量透析器TCV检测值的比较差异显著.结论 采用改良检测法对重复使用高通量透析器进行TCV检测,能提高TCV检测值的准确性.
目的 探討不同檢測方法對透析器血室容積(TCV)檢測值的影響.方法 對60支可重複使用的透析器(低通量透析器和高通量透析器各30支),按檢測方法不同分為傳統檢測組、改良檢測組和複用機檢測組3組各20支,分彆採用傳統檢測法、改良檢測法和複用機檢測法對透析器使用前、後行TCV檢測,併對結果進行比較.結果 傳統檢測組、改良檢測組和複用機檢測組測量6LR透析器和17 R透析器TCV基礎值分彆為(100.10±0.25)ml、(100.13±0.50)ml、(102.00±1.41)ml和(113.67±1.30)ml、(118.67±1.30)ml、(119.93±1.77)ml;對重複使用後6LR透析器和17 R透析器進行TCV檢測,檢測值分彆為(95.20±7.76)ml、(96.20±7.22)ml、(102.80±4.26)ml和(100.00±11.48)ml、(114.35±3.31)ml、(117.07±2.96)ml;改良檢測組與傳統檢測組對重複使用高通量透析器TCV檢測值的比較差異顯著.結論 採用改良檢測法對重複使用高通量透析器進行TCV檢測,能提高TCV檢測值的準確性.
목적 탐토불동검측방법대투석기혈실용적(TCV)검측치적영향.방법 대60지가중복사용적투석기(저통량투석기화고통량투석기각30지),안검측방법불동분위전통검측조、개량검측조화복용궤검측조3조각20지,분별채용전통검측법、개량검측법화복용궤검측법대투석기사용전、후행TCV검측,병대결과진행비교.결과 전통검측조、개량검측조화복용궤검측조측량6LR투석기화17 R투석기TCV기출치분별위(100.10±0.25)ml、(100.13±0.50)ml、(102.00±1.41)ml화(113.67±1.30)ml、(118.67±1.30)ml、(119.93±1.77)ml;대중복사용후6LR투석기화17 R투석기진행TCV검측,검측치분별위(95.20±7.76)ml、(96.20±7.22)ml、(102.80±4.26)ml화(100.00±11.48)ml、(114.35±3.31)ml、(117.07±2.96)ml;개량검측조여전통검측조대중복사용고통량투석기TCV검측치적비교차이현저.결론 채용개량검측법대중복사용고통량투석기진행TCV검측,능제고TCV검측치적준학성.
Objective To explore the influence of different testing methods on detecting value of to-tal cell volume. Methods 60 reusable dialyzers(low-flux dialyzer and high-flux dialyzer were 30 respec-tively) were enrolled. They were divided into the traditional testing group, the modified testing group and the automatic dialyzer reuse group with 20 dialyzers in each group according to different detecting methods, the results underwent analysis. Results The basic total cell volume of the traditional testing group, the modified testing group and the automatic dialyzer reuse group were (100.10±0.25) ml, (100.13±0.50) ml and (102.00±1.41) ml in 6LR dialyzer, while in 17R dialyzer, they were (113.67±1.30) ml, (118.67±1.30) ml and (119.93±1.77)ml respectively. The total cell volume of the dialyzer reuse in the traditional testing group, the modified testing group and the automatic dialyzer reuse group were (95.20±7.76) ml, (96.20± 7.22) ml and (102.80±4.26) ml in 6LR dialyzer, while in 17R dialyzer, they were (100.00±11.48) ml, (114.35±3.31 ) ml and (117.07±2.96) ml respectively. There was significant difference between the tradi-tional and the modified testing groups in high-flux dialyzers reuse. Conclusions The modified testing method can improve the accuracy of the testing of total cell volume in high-flux dialyzer reuse.
