中国全科医学
中國全科醫學
중국전과의학
CHINESE GENERAL PRACTICE
2010年
4期
419-421
,共3页
健康危险因素%健康干预%效果
健康危險因素%健康榦預%效果
건강위험인소%건강간예%효과
Health risk factors%Health intervention%Effectiveness
目的 评价群体策略和高危个体策略相结合的健康干预方法对健康危险因素的干预效果.方法 在健康风险评估的基础上对某市交响乐团员工进行群体策略和高危个体策略相结合的健康干预,比较干预前后各指标的变化.结果 干预3个月后,员工的5个健康危险因素与干预前间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),分别为血压高(从45.1%降到12.1%)、自我感觉健康差(从58.2%降到45.1%)、超重/肥胖(从38.5%降到27.5%)、胆固醇高(从26.4%降到4.4%)和工作满意度差(从15.4%降到3.3%).员工的平均健康危险因素个数大约减少了1个,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001).员工干预前的健康危险等级与干预后的健康危险等级呈负相关(r_s=0.601,P<0.05).结论 群体策略和高危个体策略相结合的健康干预可以有效改善健康危险因素状态.
目的 評價群體策略和高危箇體策略相結閤的健康榦預方法對健康危險因素的榦預效果.方法 在健康風險評估的基礎上對某市交響樂糰員工進行群體策略和高危箇體策略相結閤的健康榦預,比較榦預前後各指標的變化.結果 榦預3箇月後,員工的5箇健康危險因素與榦預前間差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05),分彆為血壓高(從45.1%降到12.1%)、自我感覺健康差(從58.2%降到45.1%)、超重/肥胖(從38.5%降到27.5%)、膽固醇高(從26.4%降到4.4%)和工作滿意度差(從15.4%降到3.3%).員工的平均健康危險因素箇數大約減少瞭1箇,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.001).員工榦預前的健康危險等級與榦預後的健康危險等級呈負相關(r_s=0.601,P<0.05).結論 群體策略和高危箇體策略相結閤的健康榦預可以有效改善健康危險因素狀態.
목적 평개군체책략화고위개체책략상결합적건강간예방법대건강위험인소적간예효과.방법 재건강풍험평고적기출상대모시교향악단원공진행군체책략화고위개체책략상결합적건강간예,비교간예전후각지표적변화.결과 간예3개월후,원공적5개건강위험인소여간예전간차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05),분별위혈압고(종45.1%강도12.1%)、자아감각건강차(종58.2%강도45.1%)、초중/비반(종38.5%강도27.5%)、담고순고(종26.4%강도4.4%)화공작만의도차(종15.4%강도3.3%).원공적평균건강위험인소개수대약감소료1개,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.001).원공간예전적건강위험등급여간예후적건강위험등급정부상관(r_s=0.601,P<0.05).결론 군체책략화고위개체책략상결합적건강간예가이유효개선건강위험인소상태.
Objective To assess the values of the combined health intervention of group strategy and high risk individual strategy to employees′ health risk factors.Methods On the basis of their health assessment,the employees in a metropolitan symphony orchestra were given 3 months combined health intervention of group strategy and high risk individual strategy,and the changes of health risk factors before and after the intervention were compared. Results After 3-month intervention,the differences in 5 health risk factors of the employees were significant (P<0.05),including hypertension (reduced from 45.1% to 12.1%),poor health felt by oneself (from 58.2% to 45.1%). overweight/obesity (from 38.5% to 27.5%),hypercholosterolemia (from 26.4% to 4.4%),and job dissatisfaction (from 15.4% to 3.3%). The average number of health risk factors reduced one (P<0.001). The health risk grade of the employees before the intervention was positively correlated with that after the intervention(r_s=0.601,P<0.05). Conclusion The combined health intervention of group strategy and high risk individual strategy can reduce health risk factors effectively.