实用临床医学
實用臨床醫學
실용림상의학
Practical Clinical Medicine
2014年
2期
49-51
,共3页
陈存波%车斯策%钟世强%农毅
陳存波%車斯策%鐘世彊%農毅
진존파%차사책%종세강%농의
大剂量静脉肾盂造影%输尿管%阴性结石
大劑量靜脈腎盂造影%輸尿管%陰性結石
대제량정맥신우조영%수뇨관%음성결석
high dose intravenous urography%ureter%radioparent calculus
目的:探讨大剂量静脉肾盂造影在输尿管阴性结石体外碎石中的应用效果。方法将86例输尿管阴性结石的患者按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组43例。对照组采用输尿管逆行插管造影定位联合体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗;观察组采用大剂量静脉肾盂造影定位联合ESWL治疗。对2组患者的排石情况及并发症(肾绞痛、血尿)发生率进行比较。结果2组患者在经一次碎石后2~20 d内均有不同程度的“细沙样”结石排出体外。2组患者一次治疗后结石的排净率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组和对照组分别有4例(9.30%)和5例(11.6%)体外排石失败改行腔内碎石术治疗;观察组发生并发症3例(肾绞痛2例、血尿1例,6.97%),对照组发生并发症4例(肾绞痛2例、血尿2例,9.30%),2组体外碎石失败率及并发症发生率的比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论大剂量静脉肾盂造影下行输尿管阴性结石ESWL治疗,结石排净率高、安全可靠,是治疗输尿管阴性结石的良好选择。
目的:探討大劑量靜脈腎盂造影在輸尿管陰性結石體外碎石中的應用效果。方法將86例輸尿管陰性結石的患者按隨機數字錶法分為對照組和觀察組,每組43例。對照組採用輸尿管逆行插管造影定位聯閤體外遲擊波碎石術(ESWL)治療;觀察組採用大劑量靜脈腎盂造影定位聯閤ESWL治療。對2組患者的排石情況及併髮癥(腎絞痛、血尿)髮生率進行比較。結果2組患者在經一次碎石後2~20 d內均有不同程度的“細沙樣”結石排齣體外。2組患者一次治療後結石的排淨率比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。觀察組和對照組分彆有4例(9.30%)和5例(11.6%)體外排石失敗改行腔內碎石術治療;觀察組髮生併髮癥3例(腎絞痛2例、血尿1例,6.97%),對照組髮生併髮癥4例(腎絞痛2例、血尿2例,9.30%),2組體外碎石失敗率及併髮癥髮生率的比較差異均無統計學意義(均P>0.05)。結論大劑量靜脈腎盂造影下行輸尿管陰性結石ESWL治療,結石排淨率高、安全可靠,是治療輸尿管陰性結石的良好選擇。
목적:탐토대제량정맥신우조영재수뇨관음성결석체외쇄석중적응용효과。방법장86례수뇨관음성결석적환자안수궤수자표법분위대조조화관찰조,매조43례。대조조채용수뇨관역행삽관조영정위연합체외충격파쇄석술(ESWL)치료;관찰조채용대제량정맥신우조영정위연합ESWL치료。대2조환자적배석정황급병발증(신교통、혈뇨)발생솔진행비교。결과2조환자재경일차쇄석후2~20 d내균유불동정도적“세사양”결석배출체외。2조환자일차치료후결석적배정솔비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。관찰조화대조조분별유4례(9.30%)화5례(11.6%)체외배석실패개행강내쇄석술치료;관찰조발생병발증3례(신교통2례、혈뇨1례,6.97%),대조조발생병발증4례(신교통2례、혈뇨2례,9.30%),2조체외쇄석실패솔급병발증발생솔적비교차이균무통계학의의(균P>0.05)。결론대제량정맥신우조영하행수뇨관음성결석ESWL치료,결석배정솔고、안전가고,시치료수뇨관음성결석적량호선택。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of high dose intravenous urography in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for radioparent calculus in the ureter. Methods A total of 86 patients with ureteral radioparent calculus were randomly assigned to receive ESWL combined with either retrograde ureteral catheterization(control group, n=43) or high dose intravenous urography(observation group, n=43). The efficacies and complications(renal colic and hematuria) were compared between the two groups. Results Sand-like stones were excreted during 2-20 days after ESWL in both groups. There were no significant differences in the stone clearance rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Intracavitary lithotripsy was performed due to the failure of ESWL in 4 patients (9.30%) in control group and in 5 patients (11.6%) in observation group. The incidence of complications was 6.97% in observation group(renal colic in 2 and hematuria in 1) and 9.30%in control group(renal colic in 2 and hematuria in 2). There were no significant differences in failure rate of ESWL and incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The combination of high dose intravenous urography and ESWL is a safe and reliable treatment with a high stone clearance rate for radioparent calculus in the ureter.