CAJ | 학술논문

目的:观察推拿治疗落枕的临床疗效.方法:将216例落枕患者随机分为推拿组110例和对照组106例,推拿组用"三部四穴五法"推拿法治疗,对照组针刺患侧外劳宫、后溪、肩井和阿是穴.每日1次,3次为1个疗程;治疗2个疗程后观察疗效. 结果:推拿组有效率为93.64%,对照组为83.02%,两者比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)结论:"三部四穴五法"推拿法治疗落枕明显优于单纯针刺疗法.
목적:관찰추나치료락침적림상료효.방법:장216례락침환자수궤분위추나조110례화대조조106례,추나조용"삼부사혈오법"추나법치료,대조조침자환측외로궁、후계、견정화아시혈.매일1차,3차위1개료정;치료2개료정후관찰료효. 결과:추나조유효솔위93.64%,대조조위83.02%,량자비교유통계학의의(P<0.05)결론:"삼부사혈오법"추나법치료락침명현우우단순침자요법.
Objective: To observe the clinical effect of Tuina for stiffneck. Methods: All of 216 cases with stiff neck were randomly allocated into a tuina group (110 cases) and a control group (106 cases). The patients in the tuina group were treated with "Three Parts, Four Points,Five Manipulation" tuina therapy, while those in the control group were treated with pucturing Wailaogong (Ex-UE 8), Houxi (SI 3), Jianjing (GB 21) and Ashi points in the affected side,Once a day, and 3 times constitute one treatment course. The effect was observed after 2-course treatments. Result: The effective rate in the tuina group and the control group was 93.64% and 83.02%, respectively, and there was statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).Conclusion: The tuina therapy of "Three Parts, Four Points, Five Manipulations" is better than simple acupuncture therapy in treating stiff neck.