中华外科杂志
中華外科雜誌
중화외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY
2010年
11期
812-815
,共4页
吴庆华%莫菱蔚%张弿%陈学瑜%张卓%毛志海%蒋渝%王明亮%郑民华
吳慶華%莫蔆蔚%張弿%陳學瑜%張卓%毛誌海%蔣渝%王明亮%鄭民華
오경화%막릉위%장건%진학유%장탁%모지해%장투%왕명량%정민화
胆囊肿瘤%胆囊切除术%腹腔镜手术%预后
膽囊腫瘤%膽囊切除術%腹腔鏡手術%預後
담낭종류%담낭절제술%복강경수술%예후
Gallbladder neoplasms%Cholecystectomy%Laparoscopic surgery%Prognosis
目的 探讨意外胆囊(IGBC)治疗预后的危险因素及评价腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)对IGBC治疗预后的影响.方法 回顾性分析2001年1月至2008年12月期间55例IGBC腺癌患者的临床资料.按不同手术方式将其分成3组,即腹腔镜组(n=23)、转开腹组(n=6)和开腹组(n=26).运用生存分析及Cox回归模型比较组间生存率差异及了解IGBC预后的相关危险因素.结果 全组术后1、3、5年生存率分别为74.3%、47.7%、35.8%,中位生存期为36个月.各组生存率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).Cox回归分析结果显示,病理T分期是影响IGBC预后的独立危险因素(OR=2.75,P=0.00);随着肿瘤浸润深度的增加,患者的牛存预后明显变差.而手术方式、切口种植等因素与预后无关(P>0.05).结论 IGBC预后与病理T分期有关,而LC对IGBC的治疗预后与开腹胆囊切除术相比无差异.
目的 探討意外膽囊(IGBC)治療預後的危險因素及評價腹腔鏡膽囊切除術(LC)對IGBC治療預後的影響.方法 迴顧性分析2001年1月至2008年12月期間55例IGBC腺癌患者的臨床資料.按不同手術方式將其分成3組,即腹腔鏡組(n=23)、轉開腹組(n=6)和開腹組(n=26).運用生存分析及Cox迴歸模型比較組間生存率差異及瞭解IGBC預後的相關危險因素.結果 全組術後1、3、5年生存率分彆為74.3%、47.7%、35.8%,中位生存期為36箇月.各組生存率的差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).Cox迴歸分析結果顯示,病理T分期是影響IGBC預後的獨立危險因素(OR=2.75,P=0.00);隨著腫瘤浸潤深度的增加,患者的牛存預後明顯變差.而手術方式、切口種植等因素與預後無關(P>0.05).結論 IGBC預後與病理T分期有關,而LC對IGBC的治療預後與開腹膽囊切除術相比無差異.
목적 탐토의외담낭(IGBC)치료예후적위험인소급평개복강경담낭절제술(LC)대IGBC치료예후적영향.방법 회고성분석2001년1월지2008년12월기간55례IGBC선암환자적림상자료.안불동수술방식장기분성3조,즉복강경조(n=23)、전개복조(n=6)화개복조(n=26).운용생존분석급Cox회귀모형비교조간생존솔차이급료해IGBC예후적상관위험인소.결과 전조술후1、3、5년생존솔분별위74.3%、47.7%、35.8%,중위생존기위36개월.각조생존솔적차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).Cox회귀분석결과현시,병리T분기시영향IGBC예후적독립위험인소(OR=2.75,P=0.00);수착종류침윤심도적증가,환자적우존예후명현변차.이수술방식、절구충식등인소여예후무관(P>0.05).결론 IGBC예후여병리T분기유관,이LC대IGBC적치료예후여개복담낭절제술상비무차이.
Objective To investigate the prognostic risk factors in incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) and evaluate the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) applied in treating IGBC. Methods The retrospective study enrolled 55 patients with incidental gallbladder adenocarcinoma treated between January 2001 and December 2008. The patients were divided into three groups according to different surgical approaches; laparoscope group (n = 23), conversion group (n = 6 ) and laparotomy group (n = 26). Survival analysis and Cox regression model were applied to comparing the difference of survival rate between three groups and to analyzing the related prognostic risk factors of ICBC. Results The overall 1-,3- and 5-year survival rates were 74. 3% , 47. 7% and 35. 8% respectively. And the median survival time was 36 months. The outcome of survival rate between three groups was not different statistically. Cox regression analysis indicated that pathologic T stage was an independent risk factor influencing IGBC( OR = 2. 75, P =0. 00). The prognosis was getting worse according to the rising depth of tumor invasion. However, the other factors, such as surgical approach, tumor incisional implantation, ect. were not related to the prognosis ( P >0. 05). Conclusion The factor of pathologic T stage is related to the prognosis of IGBC for which LC,compared with open cholecystectomy, should not be regarded as a negative factor in treatment.