中华放射学杂志
中華放射學雜誌
중화방사학잡지
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2012年
3期
234-238
,共5页
康德强%赵晶%彭楠%华海琴%李超%郭英%沈云
康德彊%趙晶%彭楠%華海琴%李超%郭英%瀋雲
강덕강%조정%팽남%화해금%리초%곽영%침운
辐射剂量%冠状血管造影术%体层摄影术,X线计算机%质量控制
輻射劑量%冠狀血管造影術%體層攝影術,X線計算機%質量控製
복사제량%관상혈관조영술%체층섭영술,X선계산궤%질량공제
Radiation dosage%Coronary angiography%Tomography%X-ray computed%Quality control
目的 通过优化个体化分类标准,探讨辐射剂量个体化基础上的低剂量冠状动脉CTA扫描实施方案.方法 连续选取行冠状动脉CTA患者200例(A组),根据患者体质量指数(BMI),采用管电压120 kV,管电流150~ 300 mA(BMI< 18.5 kg/m2者),300 ~500 mA(18.5 kg/m2≤BMI<25.0 kg/m2者),500 ~ 800 mA(BMI≥25.0 kg/m2者)进行扫描,扫描完成后分析管电流mA值与BMI、体表面积(Suf)、图像噪声(SD)的关系,并建立回归方程,依据方程推导速查表.再连续选取行冠状动脉CTA患者200例(B组),根据上述BMI与Suf分类的速查表,采用管电压100及120 kV,管电流按照速查表计算出的mA值,进行个体化低剂量扫描.统计学分析采用单因素方差分析和Kruskal-wallis H 检验.结果 管电流mA值与BMI、Suf、SD的回归计算方程为:mA=17.984×BMI+169.149×Suf-2.282×SD-361.039.A组、B组扫描图像的SD值(A组:32.08±5.80;B组:28.60±4.47)、辐射剂量指数(CTDIvol)[A组:(41.97±11.37)mGy;B组:(33.18±10.07)mGy]、有效剂量值(ED)[A组:(10.91±3.07)mSv;B组:(8.83±2.72)mSv]差异均具有统计学意义(F值分别为43.45、63.71、49.07,P值均<0.01),B组中图像噪声、辐射剂量值均小于A组.结论 BMI联合Suf作为分类标准,可进一步提高个体化的精确程度,在确保图像质量的同时合理降低辐射剂量.
目的 通過優化箇體化分類標準,探討輻射劑量箇體化基礎上的低劑量冠狀動脈CTA掃描實施方案.方法 連續選取行冠狀動脈CTA患者200例(A組),根據患者體質量指數(BMI),採用管電壓120 kV,管電流150~ 300 mA(BMI< 18.5 kg/m2者),300 ~500 mA(18.5 kg/m2≤BMI<25.0 kg/m2者),500 ~ 800 mA(BMI≥25.0 kg/m2者)進行掃描,掃描完成後分析管電流mA值與BMI、體錶麵積(Suf)、圖像譟聲(SD)的關繫,併建立迴歸方程,依據方程推導速查錶.再連續選取行冠狀動脈CTA患者200例(B組),根據上述BMI與Suf分類的速查錶,採用管電壓100及120 kV,管電流按照速查錶計算齣的mA值,進行箇體化低劑量掃描.統計學分析採用單因素方差分析和Kruskal-wallis H 檢驗.結果 管電流mA值與BMI、Suf、SD的迴歸計算方程為:mA=17.984×BMI+169.149×Suf-2.282×SD-361.039.A組、B組掃描圖像的SD值(A組:32.08±5.80;B組:28.60±4.47)、輻射劑量指數(CTDIvol)[A組:(41.97±11.37)mGy;B組:(33.18±10.07)mGy]、有效劑量值(ED)[A組:(10.91±3.07)mSv;B組:(8.83±2.72)mSv]差異均具有統計學意義(F值分彆為43.45、63.71、49.07,P值均<0.01),B組中圖像譟聲、輻射劑量值均小于A組.結論 BMI聯閤Suf作為分類標準,可進一步提高箇體化的精確程度,在確保圖像質量的同時閤理降低輻射劑量.
목적 통과우화개체화분류표준,탐토복사제량개체화기출상적저제량관상동맥CTA소묘실시방안.방법 련속선취행관상동맥CTA환자200례(A조),근거환자체질량지수(BMI),채용관전압120 kV,관전류150~ 300 mA(BMI< 18.5 kg/m2자),300 ~500 mA(18.5 kg/m2≤BMI<25.0 kg/m2자),500 ~ 800 mA(BMI≥25.0 kg/m2자)진행소묘,소묘완성후분석관전류mA치여BMI、체표면적(Suf)、도상조성(SD)적관계,병건립회귀방정,의거방정추도속사표.재련속선취행관상동맥CTA환자200례(B조),근거상술BMI여Suf분류적속사표,채용관전압100급120 kV,관전류안조속사표계산출적mA치,진행개체화저제량소묘.통계학분석채용단인소방차분석화Kruskal-wallis H 검험.결과 관전류mA치여BMI、Suf、SD적회귀계산방정위:mA=17.984×BMI+169.149×Suf-2.282×SD-361.039.A조、B조소묘도상적SD치(A조:32.08±5.80;B조:28.60±4.47)、복사제량지수(CTDIvol)[A조:(41.97±11.37)mGy;B조:(33.18±10.07)mGy]、유효제량치(ED)[A조:(10.91±3.07)mSv;B조:(8.83±2.72)mSv]차이균구유통계학의의(F치분별위43.45、63.71、49.07,P치균<0.01),B조중도상조성、복사제량치균소우A조.결론 BMI연합Suf작위분류표준,가진일보제고개체화적정학정도,재학보도상질량적동시합리강저복사제량.
Objective To investigate the methods of reducing radiation dose in CT coronary angiography through optimizing individualized scan dosage protocol.Methods Two hundred patients (group A)underwent coronary CTA examination which was performed with fixed 120 kV and variable mA according to their BMI.The mA was set as 150-300 mA(BMI < 18.5 kg/m2),300-500 mA (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 25.0 kg/m2),and 500-800 mA(BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2).When all examinations were finished,a linear regression was employed to analyze the correlation between mA and BMI,body surface(Suf),image noise(SD)respectively.The results of the analysis were used to formulate a regression equation,which was further used to establish a table list for quick search on how much mA that individualized coronary CTA scan would need.Another 200 patients(group B)enrolled for the individualized scan were scanned under new protocol that previous study established.The tube voltage was 100 and 120 kV.The tube current was variable according to the data in the table list.One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-wallis H test were used for statistics.Results Regression equation between mA and BMI,Suf,SD was:mA =17.984 × BMI + 169.149 × Suf-2.282 × SD-361.039.The SD(group A:32.08 ± 5.80,group B:28.60±4.47),dose index volume(CTDIvol)[group A:(41.97 ± 11.37)mGy,group B:(33.18±10.07)mGy],effective dose(ED)[group A:(10.91 ±3.07)mSy,group B:(8.83 ±2.72)mSv]had significant differences between the two groups(F =43.45,63.71,49.07 respectively,P <0.01 for all).The SD and ED results obtained in group B were better than those in group A.Conclusion Better performances were obtained when BMI combined Suf was used as a new individualized protocol than when BMI was used only,which means good image quality and lower radiation dosage in coronary CTA examination.