动物营养学报
動物營養學報
동물영양학보
ACTA ZOONUTRIMENTA SINICA
2010年
3期
586-594
,共9页
张捷%杨家晃%黄雅莉%何仁春%吴琛%俸润碧%黄丽霞%杨禾泽%卢桂猷
張捷%楊傢晃%黃雅莉%何仁春%吳琛%俸潤碧%黃麗霞%楊禾澤%盧桂猷
장첩%양가황%황아리%하인춘%오침%봉윤벽%황려하%양화택%로계유
合浦鹅%日粮形态%蟛蜞菊%养分消化率
閤浦鵝%日糧形態%蟛蜞菊%養分消化率
합포아%일량형태%팽기국%양분소화솔
Hepu geese%Dietary forms%Wedelia chinensis%Nutrient digestibility
本研究的目的是观察不同日粮形态对合浦鹅生长性能及养分利用的影响.将72羽28日龄的合浦鹅随机分为3组,每组3个重复,每个重复8羽(公母各1/2).A组饲喂基础精料+蟛蜞菊鲜草;B组饲喂基础精料+蟛蜞菊草粉混合的粉料;C组饲喂基础精料+蟛蜞菊草粉混合后制成的颗粒料.A组前期(28~48 d)日粮精料和蟛蜞菊鲜草的比例为1:2(风干:新鲜),后期(49~69 d)为1:3;B和C日粮组中蟛蜞菊草粉用量则参照A组鲜草的风干物质含量和比例的折算结果等量添加,同时用4 mol/L HCI AIA方法测定合浦鹅对日粮的养分消化率.试验期为42 d.结果表明:日粮B和日粮C在试验的第一阶段能显著提高试验鹅的采食量,但在整个试验期间3种日粮的采食量并没有明显差异(P>0.05).A、B和C组试验鹅全期日均精料采食量分别为208.38、207.22和205.73 g;平均日增重为56.07、62.42和63.44 g;料重比为3.72、3.32和3.24;3组日粮之间的日均精料采食量无显著差异(P>0.05),但B和C组的平均日增重和料重比显著优于A组(P<0.05),而B和C组间没有显著差异(P>0.05).3组日粮的养分消化率除了前期的干物质、粗蛋白质和P以及后期的粗蛋白质、Ca和P的消化率相近以外,B和C组日粮的能量、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维和半纤维素的消化率在两期的试验中均显著优于A组(P<0.05).此外,B和C组试验鹅的屠宰率和腹脂率也显著高于A组(P<0.05).可见,用草粉构成的B或C组的日粮形态饲用效果明显优于A组,故在生产上宜将鲜草加工成草粉后使用.
本研究的目的是觀察不同日糧形態對閤浦鵝生長性能及養分利用的影響.將72羽28日齡的閤浦鵝隨機分為3組,每組3箇重複,每箇重複8羽(公母各1/2).A組飼餵基礎精料+蟛蜞菊鮮草;B組飼餵基礎精料+蟛蜞菊草粉混閤的粉料;C組飼餵基礎精料+蟛蜞菊草粉混閤後製成的顆粒料.A組前期(28~48 d)日糧精料和蟛蜞菊鮮草的比例為1:2(風榦:新鮮),後期(49~69 d)為1:3;B和C日糧組中蟛蜞菊草粉用量則參照A組鮮草的風榦物質含量和比例的摺算結果等量添加,同時用4 mol/L HCI AIA方法測定閤浦鵝對日糧的養分消化率.試驗期為42 d.結果錶明:日糧B和日糧C在試驗的第一階段能顯著提高試驗鵝的採食量,但在整箇試驗期間3種日糧的採食量併沒有明顯差異(P>0.05).A、B和C組試驗鵝全期日均精料採食量分彆為208.38、207.22和205.73 g;平均日增重為56.07、62.42和63.44 g;料重比為3.72、3.32和3.24;3組日糧之間的日均精料採食量無顯著差異(P>0.05),但B和C組的平均日增重和料重比顯著優于A組(P<0.05),而B和C組間沒有顯著差異(P>0.05).3組日糧的養分消化率除瞭前期的榦物質、粗蛋白質和P以及後期的粗蛋白質、Ca和P的消化率相近以外,B和C組日糧的能量、中性洗滌纖維、痠性洗滌纖維和半纖維素的消化率在兩期的試驗中均顯著優于A組(P<0.05).此外,B和C組試驗鵝的屠宰率和腹脂率也顯著高于A組(P<0.05).可見,用草粉構成的B或C組的日糧形態飼用效果明顯優于A組,故在生產上宜將鮮草加工成草粉後使用.
본연구적목적시관찰불동일량형태대합포아생장성능급양분이용적영향.장72우28일령적합포아수궤분위3조,매조3개중복,매개중복8우(공모각1/2).A조사위기출정료+팽기국선초;B조사위기출정료+팽기국초분혼합적분료;C조사위기출정료+팽기국초분혼합후제성적과립료.A조전기(28~48 d)일량정료화팽기국선초적비례위1:2(풍간:신선),후기(49~69 d)위1:3;B화C일량조중팽기국초분용량칙삼조A조선초적풍간물질함량화비례적절산결과등량첨가,동시용4 mol/L HCI AIA방법측정합포아대일량적양분소화솔.시험기위42 d.결과표명:일량B화일량C재시험적제일계단능현저제고시험아적채식량,단재정개시험기간3충일량적채식량병몰유명현차이(P>0.05).A、B화C조시험아전기일균정료채식량분별위208.38、207.22화205.73 g;평균일증중위56.07、62.42화63.44 g;료중비위3.72、3.32화3.24;3조일량지간적일균정료채식량무현저차이(P>0.05),단B화C조적평균일증중화료중비현저우우A조(P<0.05),이B화C조간몰유현저차이(P>0.05).3조일량적양분소화솔제료전기적간물질、조단백질화P이급후기적조단백질、Ca화P적소화솔상근이외,B화C조일량적능량、중성세조섬유、산성세조섬유화반섬유소적소화솔재량기적시험중균현저우우A조(P<0.05).차외,B화C조시험아적도재솔화복지솔야현저고우A조(P<0.05).가견,용초분구성적B혹C조적일량형태사용효과명현우우A조,고재생산상의장선초가공성초분후사용.
This study was conducted to determine the effects of different diet forms on growth performance and nutrient utilization of Hepu geese. Seventy-two Hepu geese at age of 28 d were randomly blocked into 3 diet groups (3 replicates per group and 8 geese per replicate, half male and half female). Diet A was composed of concentrate + fresh Wedelia chinensisi diet B was mash feed composed of concentrate + Wedelia chinensis powder; diet C was pelletized feed composed of concentrate + Wedelia chinensis powder. The weight ratio of concentrate and Wedelia chinensis in diet A was 1 : 2 (air-dry : fresh) in the first period (28~48 d) and 1 : 3 in the second period (49~69 d). The amount of Wedelia chinensis powder used in diets B and C was equal to the air-dry matter content of fresh Wedelia chinensis in diet A. The method of 4 mol/L HC1 AIA was used for the determination of nutrient digestibility in geese. The experiment lasted for 42 d. Results showed that the average daily concentrate intake (ADCI) was increased in the first period but no difference was found in whole period (P> 0. 05). The ADCI of geese in 3 diets in whole period was 208. 38, 207. 22 and 205. 73 g, respectively; average daily gain (ADG) was 56. 07, 62. 42 and 63. 44 g, respectively; F/G was 4. 28, 3. 32 and 3. 24, respectively. No significant difference was found on ADCI among 3 diets (P>0. 05), however, the ADG and F/G in diets B and C were significantly better than those in diet A (P<0. 05), but no significant difference occurred between diets B and C (P>0. 05). The digestibility of energy, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber and hemicellulose in diets B and C were significantly better than those indiet A (P<0. 05) just except that dry matter, crude protein and P in first period and crude protein, Ca and P in second period, which were not different among 3 diets (P>0. 05); diets B and C also had better dressing percentage and percentage of abdominal fat than diet A (P<0. 05). Therefore, the feeding efficiency of diets B and C was much better than that of diet A, so the better way to use Wedelia chinensis for geese feeding should be to dry fresh Wedelia chinensis and make it into powder.