中华医学教育杂志
中華醫學教育雜誌
중화의학교육잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION
2010年
4期
600-602
,共3页
周汉建%田虹%温景芸%郭云蔚%熊肇军%林文晖
週漢建%田虹%溫景蕓%郭雲蔚%熊肇軍%林文暉
주한건%전홍%온경예%곽운위%웅조군%림문휘
诊断学%临床见习%案例教学%临床思维能力
診斷學%臨床見習%案例教學%臨床思維能力
진단학%림상견습%안례교학%림상사유능력
Diagnostics%Clinical teaching%Case-based teaching%Ability of clinical thinking
目的 探讨实施诊断学案例教学对培养医学生临床思维能力的效果.方法 将在中山大学附属第三医院进行诊断学见习的2006级临床医学专业130名学生随机分为实验组(66名)和对照组(64名),两组学生分别采用典型案例教学方法及传统教学方法.教学结束后,对两组学生的病例考核成绩、平时考核成绩、体格检查考核成绩、标本考核成绩、理论考核成绩、病例分析考核成绩和总成绩进行比较.结果 比较实验组与对照组学生的病例考核成绩、平时考核成绩、体格检查考核成绩、标本考核成绩,其差异均无统计学意义;而实验组学生的理论考核成绩、病例分析考核成绩和总成绩则优于对照组学生,其差异具有统计学意义,P<0.05.问卷调查结果显示:84.4%的学生对案例教学评价"很好",12.5%的学生对案例教学评价"好",3.1%的学生对案例教学评价"一般".结论 开展案例教学有助于医学生对物理诊断和实验诊断教学内容的连贯理解和掌握,有利于医学生临床思维能力的培养,有利于诊断学教学质量的提高.
目的 探討實施診斷學案例教學對培養醫學生臨床思維能力的效果.方法 將在中山大學附屬第三醫院進行診斷學見習的2006級臨床醫學專業130名學生隨機分為實驗組(66名)和對照組(64名),兩組學生分彆採用典型案例教學方法及傳統教學方法.教學結束後,對兩組學生的病例攷覈成績、平時攷覈成績、體格檢查攷覈成績、標本攷覈成績、理論攷覈成績、病例分析攷覈成績和總成績進行比較.結果 比較實驗組與對照組學生的病例攷覈成績、平時攷覈成績、體格檢查攷覈成績、標本攷覈成績,其差異均無統計學意義;而實驗組學生的理論攷覈成績、病例分析攷覈成績和總成績則優于對照組學生,其差異具有統計學意義,P<0.05.問捲調查結果顯示:84.4%的學生對案例教學評價"很好",12.5%的學生對案例教學評價"好",3.1%的學生對案例教學評價"一般".結論 開展案例教學有助于醫學生對物理診斷和實驗診斷教學內容的連貫理解和掌握,有利于醫學生臨床思維能力的培養,有利于診斷學教學質量的提高.
목적 탐토실시진단학안례교학대배양의학생림상사유능력적효과.방법 장재중산대학부속제삼의원진행진단학견습적2006급림상의학전업130명학생수궤분위실험조(66명)화대조조(64명),량조학생분별채용전형안례교학방법급전통교학방법.교학결속후,대량조학생적병례고핵성적、평시고핵성적、체격검사고핵성적、표본고핵성적、이론고핵성적、병례분석고핵성적화총성적진행비교.결과 비교실험조여대조조학생적병례고핵성적、평시고핵성적、체격검사고핵성적、표본고핵성적,기차이균무통계학의의;이실험조학생적이론고핵성적、병례분석고핵성적화총성적칙우우대조조학생,기차이구유통계학의의,P<0.05.문권조사결과현시:84.4%적학생대안례교학평개"흔호",12.5%적학생대안례교학평개"호",3.1%적학생대안례교학평개"일반".결론 개전안례교학유조우의학생대물리진단화실험진단교학내용적련관리해화장악,유리우의학생림상사유능력적배양,유리우진단학교학질량적제고.
Objective For the current shortcomings in clinical probation of diagnostics, cussed the effect of case-based teaching in practicing lessons of diagnostic was discussed. Methods 130 students were randomly divided into two groups. 66 students in the experimental group were used case-based teaching,64 students in the control group were used traditional teaching. A comparison was made between the two groups in terms of the scores. Results It showed that there were no significant differences in scores of diagnostics, including the scores of histories, physical examination, samples between the experimental group and the control group. The scores of theories, case-analyzing and total scores obtained by experimental group were higher than those by the control group, P < 0.05. The questionnaires showed that the casebased teaching was welcome by the students. The manner' s satisfactions was 84.4%, 12.5% ,3.1%.Conclusions The methods of case-based teaching helped the students well understand and master the contents of physical and laboratory diagnostics, enhance the ability of clinical thinking as well as promoting the teaching qualities of diagnostics.