CAJ | 학술논문

对比我国与国际食品法典委员会(CAC)关于肉类添加剂使用范围和限量标准,掌握CAC关于肉类添加剂的使用现状,积极有效应对国外技术性贸易措施;主要以GB2760-2007和CODEx STAN 192.1995,Rev.2007为标准资料,采用逐级对比法,研究肉与肉制品分类、肉类添加剂的功能分类、种类和数量、限量标准的差异.我国将肉与肉制品分为3大类,15亚类,CAC分为4大类,8亚类;我国和CAC主要涉及到12个功能类型的肉类添加剂,我国有122种,CAC有175种,相同种类60种.其中我国严于和宽于CAC的各有5种,分别占8%,使用范围和限量相同的有50种,占84%;我国有50.8%(62种)的肉制品添加剂CAC缺失,CAC有65.7%(115种)我国缺失.结果表明,我国和CAC在肉制品分类上虽有差异,但基本都能涵盖所有肉制品,且二者能够较好对应;我国和CAC均允许的肉类添加剂在使用标准上具有较好的一致性,但二者都存在大量独有的肉类添加剂,表明各自对同一添加剂的使用存在较大的争议.因此,有必要在安全风险评估的基础上,进一步完善我国肉类添加剂的使用标准,充分发挥添加剂在推动肉类工业发展中的作用.
대비아국여국제식품법전위원회(CAC)관우육류첨가제사용범위화한량표준,장악CAC관우육류첨가제적사용현상,적겁유효응대국외기술성무역조시;주요이GB2760-2007화CODEx STAN 192.1995,Rev.2007위표준자료,채용축급대비법,연구육여육제품분류、육류첨가제적공능분류、충류화수량、한량표준적차이.아국장육여육제품분위3대류,15아류,CAC분위4대류,8아류;아국화CAC주요섭급도12개공능류형적육류첨가제,아국유122충,CAC유175충,상동충류60충.기중아국엄우화관우CAC적각유5충,분별점8%,사용범위화한량상동적유50충,점84%;아국유50.8%(62충)적육제품첨가제CAC결실,CAC유65.7%(115충)아국결실.결과표명,아국화CAC재육제품분류상수유차이,단기본도능함개소유육제품,차이자능구교호대응;아국화CAC균윤허적육류첨가제재사용표준상구유교호적일치성,단이자도존재대량독유적육류첨가제,표명각자대동일첨가제적사용존재교대적쟁의.인차,유필요재안전풍험평고적기출상,진일보완선아국육류첨가제적사용표준,충분발휘첨가제재추동육류공업발전중적작용.
By comparing and studying the application fields & maximum level of Meat Product Additives(MPAs)Between Codex Alimentarius Commission and China National Standards,to get the application situation of MPAs about CAC,and answer up the technical barriers to trade actively and effectively.Adopt step-by-step comparing method to study the difference of classificatory system of meat product and the functional classes,kinds,quantity and maximum level of MPAs,between CAC and China with GB 2760 2007 and Codex.Stan 192.1995.Rev.2007.There are 3 class and 15 sub-class meat product in China,While,4 and 8 in CAC.There are 12 functional classes of MPAs from China and CAC,122 kinds in China,and 175 in CAC standard.There are 60 MPAs which are permitted to meat product both by CAC and China .Among them,there are 5 kinds of MPAs whose maximum level in China is lower than CAC,also 5 is higher than CAC,and 50 is almost same.There are 62 MPAs which accounting for 50.8% of total MPAs in China,are permitted by China,while not by CAC,and 115(65.7%)of that are permitted by CAC,while not by China.Results showed that there are some differences in the classifying system of meat product between CAC and China,but both of them are integrated.Furthermore,they are homologous,to some extent.According to the application fields & maximum level of MPAs which are permitted by both China and CAC,they are very homologous.Otherwise,there still are many kinds MPAs which are available alone in China or CAC,which indicates there are different points of view on same MPAs between CAC and China,so,it is necessary for China to complete National Standards of MPAs,based on risk assessment,in order to make MPAs play a more important role in meat industry development.