中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2008年
32期
3357-3359
,共3页
孟凡慧%严敏娜%王永坤%刘雪琴%罗成华%孟庆义
孟凡慧%嚴敏娜%王永坤%劉雪琴%囉成華%孟慶義
맹범혜%엄민나%왕영곤%류설금%라성화%맹경의
肠道准备%痔切除术%结扎速血管闭合系统
腸道準備%痔切除術%結扎速血管閉閤繫統
장도준비%치절제술%결찰속혈관폐합계통
Bowel preparation%Hemorrhoidectomy%Liga Sure vessel sealant system
目的 探讨不同肠道准备方法 对应用结扎速血管闭合系统行痔切除术的效果以及对患者的影响.方法 痔疮患者共78例按手术日分为硫酸镁组(n=21),开塞露组(n=32)和尤肠道准备的对照组(n=25)进行术前肠道准备.比较3组方法 的效果,包括手术医牛对肠道准备的满意度,患者对肠道准备的舒适度,术后伤口最疼痛的持续时间及VAS疼痛评分,初次排便时间及排便时VAS疼痛评分,术后恢复正常牛活时间及伤口愈合时间.结果 3组患者的观察指标中只有患者对肠道准备的舒适度比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),其中硫酸镁组61.90%的患者有不适但不影响生活;开塞露组各有6.25%的患者有不适但不影响生活,或影响生活;差异均高于对照组.结论 3种肠道准备方法 在应用结扎速血管闭合系统行痔切除术的疗效相近,在患者舒适度方面,不做肠道准备直接手术是最佳选择.如果需做肠道准备,则使用开塞露优于口服硫酸镁.
目的 探討不同腸道準備方法 對應用結扎速血管閉閤繫統行痔切除術的效果以及對患者的影響.方法 痔瘡患者共78例按手術日分為硫痠鎂組(n=21),開塞露組(n=32)和尤腸道準備的對照組(n=25)進行術前腸道準備.比較3組方法 的效果,包括手術醫牛對腸道準備的滿意度,患者對腸道準備的舒適度,術後傷口最疼痛的持續時間及VAS疼痛評分,初次排便時間及排便時VAS疼痛評分,術後恢複正常牛活時間及傷口愈閤時間.結果 3組患者的觀察指標中隻有患者對腸道準備的舒適度比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.01),其中硫痠鎂組61.90%的患者有不適但不影響生活;開塞露組各有6.25%的患者有不適但不影響生活,或影響生活;差異均高于對照組.結論 3種腸道準備方法 在應用結扎速血管閉閤繫統行痔切除術的療效相近,在患者舒適度方麵,不做腸道準備直接手術是最佳選擇.如果需做腸道準備,則使用開塞露優于口服硫痠鎂.
목적 탐토불동장도준비방법 대응용결찰속혈관폐합계통행치절제술적효과이급대환자적영향.방법 치창환자공78례안수술일분위류산미조(n=21),개새로조(n=32)화우장도준비적대조조(n=25)진행술전장도준비.비교3조방법 적효과,포괄수술의우대장도준비적만의도,환자대장도준비적서괄도,술후상구최동통적지속시간급VAS동통평분,초차배편시간급배편시VAS동통평분,술후회복정상우활시간급상구유합시간.결과 3조환자적관찰지표중지유환자대장도준비적서괄도비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),기중류산미조61.90%적환자유불괄단불영향생활;개새로조각유6.25%적환자유불괄단불영향생활,혹영향생활;차이균고우대조조.결론 3충장도준비방법 재응용결찰속혈관폐합계통행치절제술적료효상근,재환자서괄도방면,불주장도준비직접수술시최가선택.여과수주장도준비,칙사용개새로우우구복류산미.
Objective To approach the effect of Hemorthoidectomy using LigaSure vessel sealant
system with different bowel preparation means.Methods Seventy-eight patients with hemorrhoids were divided into three groups which are the Epsom salt group(21 cases),the Kaiselu group(32 eases),and the no bowel preparation group(25 cases)according to their operation's day.The observation items are the satisfaction rate of the operative doctors,the degree of comfort to patient,the severe pain duration time and scores,the first defecation time and the pain scores after operation,and the intention time.Results 61.90%patients in Epsom salt group felt uncomfortable but did not influence the life.6.25%patients in Kaiselu group felt uncomfortable
but did not influence the life and 6.25%patients felt uncomfortable and influence the life.The degree of comfort of patient Was significant difference in three groups(H=13.39,P=0.001 2).There were no significant differences in other observation items among three groups(P>0.05).Condusions There are similar effect in three groups with Hemorrhoidectomy patient using LigaSure vessel sealant system,but in the degree of comfort to patients,the no bowel preparation means is the hest choice for patient.If the doctor order to do bowel preparation for patient,the bowel preparation using Kaiselu is better than that using Epsom salt.