中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2009年
1期
21-24
,共4页
孙克华%卢亦成%胡国汉%骆纯%候立军%陈菊祥%周健
孫剋華%盧亦成%鬍國漢%駱純%候立軍%陳菊祥%週健
손극화%로역성%호국한%락순%후립군%진국상%주건
痉挛性斜颈%神经血管压迫%神经血管减压%痉挛肌肉切断
痙攣性斜頸%神經血管壓迫%神經血管減壓%痙攣肌肉切斷
경련성사경%신경혈관압박%신경혈관감압%경련기육절단
Spasmodic torticoUis%Neurovascular compression%Micrneurovascular decompression%Resection of cervical muscles
目的 研究神经血管减压、肌肉切断和肉毒素治疗痉挛性斜颈(ST)的差别.探讨ST的真正发病原因、寻找治疗ST的有效方法 .方法 选择9例经过其他方法 治疗无效而且不愿意行肌肉切断的ST患者,经过临床、神经影像学和神经电生理检查后行副神经血管减压术.把神经血管减压治疗ST的结果 与采用肌肉切断方法 治疗的13例患者、采用肉毒素治疗的22例患者结果 进行比较.结果 22例应用肉毒素和其他药物治疗的患者在初期症状会有所缓解,但是数月后又逐渐加重,无一例能够治愈.13例患者接受1~2次、一侧或双侧痉挛性肌肉切断术,4例痉挛症状在术后得到明显改善,9例患者改善较少.肌肉切断后的患者均有不同程度的颈部运动功能障碍.9例患者选择行神经血管减压,术中发现都有严重的血管压迫.5例在神经血管减压后的2~14 d症状得到明显改善,术后3、6个月复查时疗效稳定,都恢复了正常的工作和生活;4例在神经血管减压后的早期症状有部分改善,在3个月时症状得到进一步的改善,至6个月时疗效稳定都恢复了正常的工作和生活.神经血管减压术无病死率,无脑脊液漏、感染、脑挫伤、出血和神经损伤等并发症.结论 血管压迫副神经可能是引起ST的重要原因之一,行副神经血管减压对一些ST确有疗效.但是要判断哪些患者是神经血管减压的适应证却非常困难.因此严格筛选和掌握手术指征、建立手术前后客观评价疗效标准和筛选方法 非常重要.
目的 研究神經血管減壓、肌肉切斷和肉毒素治療痙攣性斜頸(ST)的差彆.探討ST的真正髮病原因、尋找治療ST的有效方法 .方法 選擇9例經過其他方法 治療無效而且不願意行肌肉切斷的ST患者,經過臨床、神經影像學和神經電生理檢查後行副神經血管減壓術.把神經血管減壓治療ST的結果 與採用肌肉切斷方法 治療的13例患者、採用肉毒素治療的22例患者結果 進行比較.結果 22例應用肉毒素和其他藥物治療的患者在初期癥狀會有所緩解,但是數月後又逐漸加重,無一例能夠治愈.13例患者接受1~2次、一側或雙側痙攣性肌肉切斷術,4例痙攣癥狀在術後得到明顯改善,9例患者改善較少.肌肉切斷後的患者均有不同程度的頸部運動功能障礙.9例患者選擇行神經血管減壓,術中髮現都有嚴重的血管壓迫.5例在神經血管減壓後的2~14 d癥狀得到明顯改善,術後3、6箇月複查時療效穩定,都恢複瞭正常的工作和生活;4例在神經血管減壓後的早期癥狀有部分改善,在3箇月時癥狀得到進一步的改善,至6箇月時療效穩定都恢複瞭正常的工作和生活.神經血管減壓術無病死率,無腦脊液漏、感染、腦挫傷、齣血和神經損傷等併髮癥.結論 血管壓迫副神經可能是引起ST的重要原因之一,行副神經血管減壓對一些ST確有療效.但是要判斷哪些患者是神經血管減壓的適應證卻非常睏難.因此嚴格篩選和掌握手術指徵、建立手術前後客觀評價療效標準和篩選方法 非常重要.
목적 연구신경혈관감압、기육절단화육독소치료경련성사경(ST)적차별.탐토ST적진정발병원인、심조치료ST적유효방법 .방법 선택9례경과기타방법 치료무효이차불원의행기육절단적ST환자,경과림상、신경영상학화신경전생리검사후행부신경혈관감압술.파신경혈관감압치료ST적결과 여채용기육절단방법 치료적13례환자、채용육독소치료적22례환자결과 진행비교.결과 22례응용육독소화기타약물치료적환자재초기증상회유소완해,단시수월후우축점가중,무일례능구치유.13례환자접수1~2차、일측혹쌍측경련성기육절단술,4례경련증상재술후득도명현개선,9례환자개선교소.기육절단후적환자균유불동정도적경부운동공능장애.9례환자선택행신경혈관감압,술중발현도유엄중적혈관압박.5례재신경혈관감압후적2~14 d증상득도명현개선,술후3、6개월복사시료효은정,도회복료정상적공작화생활;4례재신경혈관감압후적조기증상유부분개선,재3개월시증상득도진일보적개선,지6개월시료효은정도회복료정상적공작화생활.신경혈관감압술무병사솔,무뇌척액루、감염、뇌좌상、출혈화신경손상등병발증.결론 혈관압박부신경가능시인기ST적중요원인지일,행부신경혈관감압대일사ST학유료효.단시요판단나사환자시신경혈관감압적괄응증각비상곤난.인차엄격사선화장악수술지정、건립수술전후객관평개료효표준화사선방법 비상중요.
Objective To compare the effects of treatment of spasmodic torticollis (ST) by neurovascular decompression, myotomy, and botulinum toxin type A and to investigate the mechanism of ST. Methods Nine ST patients who failed to respond to other conservative treatment methods underwent neurovascular decompression of accessory nerve. The effect of decompression was compared with that by botulinum toxin in 22 patients and that by myotomy in 13 patients. Results The symptoms and signs were improved to a certain degree by botulinum toxin treatment at first, but recurred and gradually worsened in several months. None of the 22 patients had reached a real cure by botulinum toxin type A treatment. Four of 13 patients undergoing myotomy improved a lot in the symptoms and 9 improved only a bit. However, weakness in neck movement was found in all patients after myotomy. Neurovascular decompression was performed on 9 patients, 5 of which had had botulinum toxin treatment and 1 had undergone myotomy, and found that all of them had severe vascular compression in the accessory nerve. Obvious alleviation of symptoms was achieved 2 ~ 14 days after the operation in 8 patients, and 3 months later in 1 patient. All of the 9 patients resumed their normal work and life 6 months after the operation. No complication, such as nerve damage, infection, hemorrhage, leakage of eerebrospinal fluid, and weakness of neck, was found. Conclusions Neurovascular compression may be the most important cause of ST. Microneurovascular decompression is effective for some patients. However, it is still difficult to judge its indication.