临床泌尿外科杂志
臨床泌尿外科雜誌
림상비뇨외과잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY
2009年
7期
515-519
,共5页
朱捷%高江平%洪宝发%石怀银%崔亮%杜青山%张旭
硃捷%高江平%洪寶髮%石懷銀%崔亮%杜青山%張旭
주첩%고강평%홍보발%석부은%최량%두청산%장욱
前列腺癌%非那雄胺%发病率%病理分级
前列腺癌%非那雄胺%髮病率%病理分級
전렬선암%비나웅알%발병솔%병리분급
prostate cancer%finasteride%incidence%pathology grading
目的:评估非那雄胺对中国人前列腺癌发病率及病理分级的影响.方法:将1 029例BPH患者根据其药物治疗的方法分为非那雄胺组、α-受体阻滞剂组、联合用药组及对照组(未治疗组).收集四组患者的穿刺病理资料,重新行Gleason评分.对四组患者前列腺癌发病率及前列腺癌病理分级的差异进行分析.结果:①前列腺癌总发病率为13.51%;应用非那雄胺组与未应用非那雄胺组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),发病率相对下降40.63%(RR=0.59,95%CI:0.43~0.82).②前列腺癌患者病理分级为中高级(Gleason≥7分)者占58.27%,应用非那雄胺组与未应用非那雄胺组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),中高级分化前列腺癌相对增多33.96%(RR=1.34,95%CI:1.01~1.76).结论:非那雄胺治疗BPH虽能降低前列腺癌的发病风险,但同时能使发生前列腺癌的病理级别增高.
目的:評估非那雄胺對中國人前列腺癌髮病率及病理分級的影響.方法:將1 029例BPH患者根據其藥物治療的方法分為非那雄胺組、α-受體阻滯劑組、聯閤用藥組及對照組(未治療組).收集四組患者的穿刺病理資料,重新行Gleason評分.對四組患者前列腺癌髮病率及前列腺癌病理分級的差異進行分析.結果:①前列腺癌總髮病率為13.51%;應用非那雄胺組與未應用非那雄胺組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),髮病率相對下降40.63%(RR=0.59,95%CI:0.43~0.82).②前列腺癌患者病理分級為中高級(Gleason≥7分)者佔58.27%,應用非那雄胺組與未應用非那雄胺組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),中高級分化前列腺癌相對增多33.96%(RR=1.34,95%CI:1.01~1.76).結論:非那雄胺治療BPH雖能降低前列腺癌的髮病風險,但同時能使髮生前列腺癌的病理級彆增高.
목적:평고비나웅알대중국인전렬선암발병솔급병리분급적영향.방법:장1 029례BPH환자근거기약물치료적방법분위비나웅알조、α-수체조체제조、연합용약조급대조조(미치료조).수집사조환자적천자병리자료,중신행Gleason평분.대사조환자전렬선암발병솔급전렬선암병리분급적차이진행분석.결과:①전렬선암총발병솔위13.51%;응용비나웅알조여미응용비나웅알조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),발병솔상대하강40.63%(RR=0.59,95%CI:0.43~0.82).②전렬선암환자병리분급위중고급(Gleason≥7분)자점58.27%,응용비나웅알조여미응용비나웅알조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),중고급분화전렬선암상대증다33.96%(RR=1.34,95%CI:1.01~1.76).결론:비나웅알치료BPH수능강저전렬선암적발병풍험,단동시능사발생전렬선암적병리급별증고.
Objective:To evaluate the influence of finasteride on incidence and pathology grading of prostate ca-ner in China. Methods:Depend on the medication, 1029 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were di-vided into 4 groups: finasteride group,α-receptor inhibitor group, eombination group and control group (non-treatment group). We gathered pathology sections of all patients, and gave Gleason Score to each. The difference the population was 13.51%. Compare with non-using of finasteride, using of it could reduee the incidence of pros-tate cancer 40.63% than non-using group's (RR = 0.59,95% CI: 0.43-0.82). There was a significant difference cancer patients was 58.27%, The ratio was quite different using finasteride and patients not (P<0.05), and it in-creased 33.96% in finasteride groups compare to not using groups(RR= 1.34,95%CI: 1.01-1.76). Conclusions: The risk of prostate eaneer in BPH patients could be decreased by finasteride treatment. But the malignant degree of prostate caner could be increased in BPH patients using finaseride.