地质学报
地質學報
지질학보
ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA
2010年
3期
293-310
,共18页
黎敦朋%赵越%刘健%潘燕兵%裴军令%何哲峰
黎敦朋%趙越%劉健%潘燕兵%裴軍令%何哲峰
려돈붕%조월%류건%반연병%배군령%하철봉
构造变形%后展式逆冲扩展%上新世-早更新世%青藏高原西北缘
構造變形%後展式逆遲擴展%上新世-早更新世%青藏高原西北緣
구조변형%후전식역충확전%상신세-조경신세%청장고원서북연
tectonic deformation%thrusting extension%Pliocene-early Pleistocene%the northwestern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
晚新生代,印亚碰撞的远程效应使青藏高原周缘发生了强烈的构造变形和隆升作用,然而不同学者对高原强烈构造变形和隆升时代的认识却大相径庭.本文通过对青藏高原西北缘晚新生代褶皱冲断带的构造变形、沉积作用、岩浆活动与地貌响应等的综合研究,依据古新统至中新统地层的连续沉积和产状的协调一致,提出青藏高原西北缘在古新世-中新世末并未发生区域性强烈的构造变形,并基于褶皱、生长地层、楔顶沉积和冲断带中局部不整合等标定青藏高原西北缘强烈构造变形的时代为上新世-早更新世,其中最强烈的构造变形发生于西域砾岩沉积结束阶段,即约1.1~0.7 Ma的昆黄运动最终使中更新世以前地层全面褶皱-抬升,形成区域性的乌苏群与西域砾岩之间的角度不整合,这为青藏高原西北缘晚新生代的构造变形提供了关键的构造地质学证据;同时,根据磷灰石裂变径迹的研究成果提出青藏高原西北缘的主要隆升可能是在上新世-早更新世通过高原边缘的边界断层系以后展式逆冲扩展作用抬升形成的,并就裂变径迹热历史模拟的剥蚀厚度提出西域砾岩很可能主要来自高原边缘地形变化最剧烈的陡坡带,支持西域砾岩属构造成因的认识.
晚新生代,印亞踫撞的遠程效應使青藏高原週緣髮生瞭彊烈的構造變形和隆升作用,然而不同學者對高原彊烈構造變形和隆升時代的認識卻大相徑庭.本文通過對青藏高原西北緣晚新生代褶皺遲斷帶的構造變形、沉積作用、巖漿活動與地貌響應等的綜閤研究,依據古新統至中新統地層的連續沉積和產狀的協調一緻,提齣青藏高原西北緣在古新世-中新世末併未髮生區域性彊烈的構造變形,併基于褶皺、生長地層、楔頂沉積和遲斷帶中跼部不整閤等標定青藏高原西北緣彊烈構造變形的時代為上新世-早更新世,其中最彊烈的構造變形髮生于西域礫巖沉積結束階段,即約1.1~0.7 Ma的昆黃運動最終使中更新世以前地層全麵褶皺-抬升,形成區域性的烏囌群與西域礫巖之間的角度不整閤,這為青藏高原西北緣晚新生代的構造變形提供瞭關鍵的構造地質學證據;同時,根據燐灰石裂變徑跡的研究成果提齣青藏高原西北緣的主要隆升可能是在上新世-早更新世通過高原邊緣的邊界斷層繫以後展式逆遲擴展作用抬升形成的,併就裂變徑跡熱歷史模擬的剝蝕厚度提齣西域礫巖很可能主要來自高原邊緣地形變化最劇烈的陡坡帶,支持西域礫巖屬構造成因的認識.
만신생대,인아팽당적원정효응사청장고원주연발생료강렬적구조변형화륭승작용,연이불동학자대고원강렬구조변형화륭승시대적인식각대상경정.본문통과대청장고원서북연만신생대습추충단대적구조변형、침적작용、암장활동여지모향응등적종합연구,의거고신통지중신통지층적련속침적화산상적협조일치,제출청장고원서북연재고신세-중신세말병미발생구역성강렬적구조변형,병기우습추、생장지층、설정침적화충단대중국부불정합등표정청장고원서북연강렬구조변형적시대위상신세-조경신세,기중최강렬적구조변형발생우서역력암침적결속계단,즉약1.1~0.7 Ma적곤황운동최종사중경신세이전지층전면습추-태승,형성구역성적오소군여서역력암지간적각도불정합,저위청장고원서북연만신생대적구조변형제공료관건적구조지질학증거;동시,근거린회석렬변경적적연구성과제출청장고원서북연적주요륭승가능시재상신세-조경신세통과고원변연적변계단층계이후전식역충확전작용태승형성적,병취렬변경적열역사모의적박식후도제출서역력암흔가능주요래자고원변연지형변화최극렬적두파대,지지서역력암속구조성인적인식.
In Late Cenozoic, the long-range effect of Indo-Asia collision may result in strong tectonic deformation and uplift of marginal area in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. However, different geologists have very different understanding of the age of the tectonic deformation and uplift in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Hence, there is no consensus to be reached. Based on an integrated research of tectonic deformation, sedimentation, magmatic activity and physiographic response to the fold and thrust belt on the northwestern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau late Cenozoic, in combination with Paleocene to Miocene strata sedimentation′s succession and strata dips′ coherence, it is suggested that a strong regional tectonic deformation has not taken place in the northwestern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau at the Paleocene-late Miocene. Unconformity marks such as folds, growth stratum, wedge-top sediment and local unconformity contact in thrust-fold belt indicate an age of Pliocene-early Pleistocene for the strong tectonic deformation in the northwestern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. In addition, the strongest deformation took place at the end of Xiyu conglomerate deposition, that is Kunlun-huanghe Movement at about 1.1~0.7 Ma, which finally resulted in overall folding and uplifting of strata before Pleistocene and regionally angular unconformity between Wusu Formation and Xiyu comgloerate. This provides the key structural geological evidence for tectonic deformation of the northwestern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in late Cenozoic. Meanwhile, research of apatite fission track suggests that main uplifting of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau likely resulted from the boundary fault of the Plateau in the form of thrusting extension in Pliocene and Pleistocene. Denudation thickness by fission track modeling indicates that the Xiyu conglomerate should come from slope zone which had suffered landform change, which supports the understanding of the tectonic genesis of the Xiyu conglomerate.