CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨高脂血症和C反应蛋白与急性胰腺炎的相关性.方法总结42例高脂血症AP患者,按诊断标准分为SAP和MAP两组,比较各自血脂和CRP及降脂治疗前后APACHE Ⅱ、Ranson及CT评分.结果 SAP与MAP比较,其CRP、TG均明显增高,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),两者胆固醇差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);42例高脂血症AP患者经降脂治疗前后APACHE Ⅱ、Ranaon、CT等评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论高甘油三酯血症是AP的危险因素;结合CRP可作为AP患者病情严重程度评价指标之一.
목적 탐토고지혈증화C반응단백여급성이선염적상관성.방법 총결42례고지혈증AP환자,안진단표준분위SAP화MAP량조,비교각자혈지화CRP급강지치료전후APACHE Ⅱ、Ranson급CT평분.결과 SAP여MAP비교,기CRP、TG균명현증고,량자비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),량자담고순차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);42례고지혈증AP환자경강지치료전후APACHE Ⅱ、Ranaon、CT등평분비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 고감유삼지혈증시AP적위험인소;결합CRP가작위AP환자병정엄중정도평개지표지일.
Objective To analyze the correlation of acute pancreatitis with hyperlipemia and C reactive pro-tein. Methods 42 patients with acute pancreatitis with hyperlipemia were divided into two groups of SAP group and MAP group under the diagnostic code. The blood fat and CRP were compared between the two groups, also the scores of APACHE Ⅱ , Ranson and CT were measured. Results The CRP and TG in group SAP compared with those in group MAP had significant difference(P<0.01),but the CHOL has no-difference;the scores of APACHEⅡ , Ranson and CT after control lipid in 42 patients were significantly' different( P < 0.05). Conclusion Hyperlipe-mia is one risk factors of the AP;combined with the CRP, it can be one evaluating index of the severity.