CAJ | 학술논문

目的以中国科学引文数据核心库( CSCD-C)收录的生物医学期刊为数据来源,通过实证分析,对开放获取期刊在学术交流体系中的影响力进行比较研究.方法采用文献计量学与统计学方法,利用SPSS软件进行秩和检验,对CSCD收录的开放获取与非开放获取的生物医学期刊分别进行多指标统计.结果开放获取期刊仅占统计期刊总数的31.63％；开放获取期刊平均基金论文比为72.29％.统计期刊在学科中的影响力,临床医学与特种医学类开放获取期刊的自被引率较高；生物学类开放获取期刊的平均影响因子与h指数较高；预防医学类开放获取期刊的平均影响因子较高；综合医学类非开放获取期刊的平均h指数较高.结论各学科开放获取期刊的数量分布不均衡；开放获取期刊的基金论文比高于非开放获取期刊,两者学科影响力差异不明显.
목적 이중국과학인문수거핵심고( CSCD-C)수록적생물의학기간위수거래원,통과실증분석,대개방획취기간재학술교류체계중적영향력진행비교연구.방법 채용문헌계량학여통계학방법,이용SPSS연건진행질화검험,대CSCD수록적개방획취여비개방획취적생물의학기간분별진행다지표통계.결과 개방획취기간부점통계기간총수적31.63％；개방획취기간평균기금논문비위72.29％.통계기간재학과중적영향력,림상의학여특충의학류개방획취기간적자피인솔교고；생물학류개방획취기간적평균영향인자여h지수교고；예방의학류개방획취기간적평균영향인자교고；종합의학류비개방획취기간적평균h지수교고.결론 각학과개방획취기간적수량분포불균형；개방획취기간적기금논문비고우비개방획취기간,량자학과영향력차이불명현.
Objective To compare the influence of open access journals ( OAJ ) of biomedicine on academic exchanges by empirically analyzing the journals enrolled in the Chinese science citation database-the core (CSCD-C).Methods Multivariate statistical analysis was performed on OAJ and non OAJ in CSCD by using bibliometric and statistical methods,SPSS software and rank-sum test.Results The OAJ were accounted for only 31.63％ of the total enrolled journals,the average ratio of funded papers in OAJ was 72.29％.Statistical journals had high influence in the discipline.The selfcitation rates of clinical medicine OAJ and special medical OAJ were high.The average impact factor and h index in biological OAJ were high.The average impact factor of preventive medicine OAJ was high.The average h index of comprehensive non OAJ was high.Conclusions The distribution of OAJ is uneven among different disciplines.The ratio of funded papers is higher in OAJ than in non OAJ with insignificant differences in discipline influence.