中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2011年
6期
522-524
,共3页
王少莲%魏岱林%付方明%周研%王海军%乔明琦%张惠云
王少蓮%魏岱林%付方明%週研%王海軍%喬明琦%張惠雲
왕소련%위대림%부방명%주연%왕해군%교명기%장혜운
Graves病%应对方式%个性特征
Graves病%應對方式%箇性特徵
Graves병%응대방식%개성특정
Graves' disease%Coping style%Personality
目的 探索应对方式、个性特征对Graves病(GD)发病的影响,为预防Graves病提供流行病学依据.方法 采用特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)、艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)中文版对临床收集的581名Graves病患者及社区收集的800名健康对照收集资料,应用非条件logistic逐步回归分析进行整体分析,并按照年龄、性别、文化程度进行分层分析,探索应对方式与个性特征对Graves病发病的影响.结果 整体分发现消极应对方式(OR=1.068,P=0.ooo)、掩饰性(OR=1.121,P=0.000)和内外向(OR=1.089,P=0.005)均为Graves病发病危险因素;按照性别、年龄和文化程度分层分析,其结果与整体分析结果基本一致,同时发现积极应对方式为Graves病发病保护因素(各分层分析中OR<1.000,P<0.05),神经质(OR>1.000,P<0.05)为部分人群Graves病发病危险因素.结论 采取积极应对方式和针对性调整个性特征,可以有效预防Graves病发病.
目的 探索應對方式、箇性特徵對Graves病(GD)髮病的影響,為預防Graves病提供流行病學依據.方法 採用特質應對方式問捲(TCSQ)、艾森剋人格問捲(EPQ)中文版對臨床收集的581名Graves病患者及社區收集的800名健康對照收集資料,應用非條件logistic逐步迴歸分析進行整體分析,併按照年齡、性彆、文化程度進行分層分析,探索應對方式與箇性特徵對Graves病髮病的影響.結果 整體分髮現消極應對方式(OR=1.068,P=0.ooo)、掩飾性(OR=1.121,P=0.000)和內外嚮(OR=1.089,P=0.005)均為Graves病髮病危險因素;按照性彆、年齡和文化程度分層分析,其結果與整體分析結果基本一緻,同時髮現積極應對方式為Graves病髮病保護因素(各分層分析中OR<1.000,P<0.05),神經質(OR>1.000,P<0.05)為部分人群Graves病髮病危險因素.結論 採取積極應對方式和針對性調整箇性特徵,可以有效預防Graves病髮病.
목적 탐색응대방식、개성특정대Graves병(GD)발병적영향,위예방Graves병제공류행병학의거.방법 채용특질응대방식문권(TCSQ)、애삼극인격문권(EPQ)중문판대림상수집적581명Graves병환자급사구수집적800명건강대조수집자료,응용비조건logistic축보회귀분석진행정체분석,병안조년령、성별、문화정도진행분층분석,탐색응대방식여개성특정대Graves병발병적영향.결과 정체분발현소겁응대방식(OR=1.068,P=0.ooo)、엄식성(OR=1.121,P=0.000)화내외향(OR=1.089,P=0.005)균위Graves병발병위험인소;안조성별、년령화문화정도분층분석,기결과여정체분석결과기본일치,동시발현적겁응대방식위Graves병발병보호인소(각분층분석중OR<1.000,P<0.05),신경질(OR>1.000,P<0.05)위부분인군Graves병발병위험인소.결론 채취적겁응대방식화침대성조정개성특정,가이유효예방Graves병발병.
Objective To explore the role of coping styles and personalities in the etiology of Graves' disease (GD). Methods All participants (581 patients and 800 normal controls) completed the general information questionnaires,trait coping style questionnaires(TCSQ) and eysenck personality questionnaires revised,short scale for Chinese(EPQ-RSC). Basic characteristics of all subjects were documented, and logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the role of coping styles and personality in etiology of GD. Results The negative coping style(OR = 1.068,P=0.000) ,concealing character(OR = 1. 121, P=0.000) and internal and external personality (OR = 1.089, P = 0.005) neurotic personality (OR > 1.000, P< 0.05) were risk factors of GD( OR = 1. 162, P = 0.000) ,positive coping style was protective factor of GD( OR < 1.000, P<0.05). Conclusion Positive coping style and specific personality adjustment can prevent effectively onset of GD.