国际医学寄生虫病杂志
國際醫學寄生蟲病雜誌
국제의학기생충병잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PARASITIC DISEASES
2012年
3期
171-173
,共3页
杨冉%李白坤%李茜茜%冯鑫%汪婷婷%王鸣瑞%朱继民
楊冉%李白坤%李茜茜%馮鑫%汪婷婷%王鳴瑞%硃繼民
양염%리백곤%리천천%풍흠%왕정정%왕명서%주계민
亚健康%ROC曲线%筛检
亞健康%ROC麯線%篩檢
아건강%ROC곡선%사검
Sub-health%ROC%Screening
目的 探讨采用问卷进行高校教师亚健康状态筛检的标准.方法 采用问卷调查结合健康体检了解157名高校教师亚健康的发生情况,借助受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)曲线拟定亚健康问卷筛检的标准.结果 亚健康发生率为32.5%(51/157),亚健康者的问卷得分明显高于健康者(z=-9.920,P<0.001).ROC曲线分析显示:问卷得分为18.5时曲线下的面积达0.98,筛检的灵敏度为96.1%,特异度为95.2%,正确指数为0.913;符合率为0.955,Kappa值为0.899(P<0.001);阳性预测值为90.7%,阴性预测值为98.0%.结论 基于该问卷对高校教师亚健康进行筛检的判断标准可能为18.5分.
目的 探討採用問捲進行高校教師亞健康狀態篩檢的標準.方法 採用問捲調查結閤健康體檢瞭解157名高校教師亞健康的髮生情況,藉助受試者工作特徵(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)麯線擬定亞健康問捲篩檢的標準.結果 亞健康髮生率為32.5%(51/157),亞健康者的問捲得分明顯高于健康者(z=-9.920,P<0.001).ROC麯線分析顯示:問捲得分為18.5時麯線下的麵積達0.98,篩檢的靈敏度為96.1%,特異度為95.2%,正確指數為0.913;符閤率為0.955,Kappa值為0.899(P<0.001);暘性預測值為90.7%,陰性預測值為98.0%.結論 基于該問捲對高校教師亞健康進行篩檢的判斷標準可能為18.5分.
목적 탐토채용문권진행고교교사아건강상태사검적표준.방법 채용문권조사결합건강체검료해157명고교교사아건강적발생정황,차조수시자공작특정(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)곡선의정아건강문권사검적표준.결과 아건강발생솔위32.5%(51/157),아건강자적문권득분명현고우건강자(z=-9.920,P<0.001).ROC곡선분석현시:문권득분위18.5시곡선하적면적체0.98,사검적령민도위96.1%,특이도위95.2%,정학지수위0.913;부합솔위0.955,Kappa치위0.899(P<0.001);양성예측치위90.7%,음성예측치위98.0%.결론 기우해문권대고교교사아건강진행사검적판단표준가능위18.5분.
Objective To explore the cut-point of questionnaire score for Sub-health status among college teachers.Methods 157 teachers were investigated using questionnaires and health check,receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to select the cut point for sub-health status.Results The prevalence of sub-health among college teachers was 32.5 percent (51/157) with the significant difference between healthy and sub-healthy people(z=-9.920,P<0.001).The results of ROC analysis indicated that the cut point was 18.5 with an area proportion of 0.98,sensitivity of 0.961,specificity of 0.952,Youden index equal to 0.913,crude agreement of 0.955,Kappa value of 0.899 (P<0.001),positive predictive value of 0.907,and negative predictive value of 0.980.Conclusion The score of 18.5 may be a good cut point to screen sub-health status among college teachers using this questionnaire.