中华肝胆外科杂志
中華肝膽外科雜誌
중화간담외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY
2010年
9期
683-687
,共5页
赵宏峰%周杰%王宇%任旋磊
趙宏峰%週傑%王宇%任鏇磊
조굉봉%주걸%왕우%임선뢰
肝移植%胆道%缺血再灌注损伤%胆管周围血管丛%大鼠
肝移植%膽道%缺血再灌註損傷%膽管週圍血管叢%大鼠
간이식%담도%결혈재관주손상%담관주위혈관총%대서
Liver transplantation%Biliary tract%Ischemia-reperfusion injury%Peribiliary vascular plexus%Rat
目的 研究胆道系统不同部位胆管上皮细胞的异质性以及胆管周围血管丛构筑形式的不同,对缺血再灌注损伤耐受性的差异.方法 30只SD大鼠随机分成3组,Ⅰ组(假手术组),Ⅱ组(胆道缺血1 h再灌注1 h组),Ⅲ组(胆道缺血1 h再灌注2 h组).对肝门部胆管、胆总管近端及小叶间胆管的上皮细胞行凋亡(TUNEL法)检测、病理形态学评分和超微结构的定量分析.结果 Ⅱ组的细胞凋亡及病理形态评分在胆总管近端与小叶间胆管无统计学差异(P>0.05),但肝门部损伤较重(P<0.05);线粒体平均体积(V)及微绒毛面积密度(AMv)比较在肝门部最重,胆总管近端最轻(P<0.05).在Ⅲ组以上各指标都表现为肝门部最重,小叶间胆管次之,胆总管近端最轻(P<0.05).结论 胆管上皮细胞的异质性以及周围血管丛不同部位构筑形式的不同导致了胆道系统各部位损伤程度的差异.该结果为解释肝门部胆管狭窄高发率的临床表现提供了一定的实验基础.胆总管近端损伤最轻这一结果提示,在临床肝移植中,应尽量以胆总管近端作为最佳吻合部位.
目的 研究膽道繫統不同部位膽管上皮細胞的異質性以及膽管週圍血管叢構築形式的不同,對缺血再灌註損傷耐受性的差異.方法 30隻SD大鼠隨機分成3組,Ⅰ組(假手術組),Ⅱ組(膽道缺血1 h再灌註1 h組),Ⅲ組(膽道缺血1 h再灌註2 h組).對肝門部膽管、膽總管近耑及小葉間膽管的上皮細胞行凋亡(TUNEL法)檢測、病理形態學評分和超微結構的定量分析.結果 Ⅱ組的細胞凋亡及病理形態評分在膽總管近耑與小葉間膽管無統計學差異(P>0.05),但肝門部損傷較重(P<0.05);線粒體平均體積(V)及微絨毛麵積密度(AMv)比較在肝門部最重,膽總管近耑最輕(P<0.05).在Ⅲ組以上各指標都錶現為肝門部最重,小葉間膽管次之,膽總管近耑最輕(P<0.05).結論 膽管上皮細胞的異質性以及週圍血管叢不同部位構築形式的不同導緻瞭膽道繫統各部位損傷程度的差異.該結果為解釋肝門部膽管狹窄高髮率的臨床錶現提供瞭一定的實驗基礎.膽總管近耑損傷最輕這一結果提示,在臨床肝移植中,應儘量以膽總管近耑作為最佳吻閤部位.
목적 연구담도계통불동부위담관상피세포적이질성이급담관주위혈관총구축형식적불동,대결혈재관주손상내수성적차이.방법 30지SD대서수궤분성3조,Ⅰ조(가수술조),Ⅱ조(담도결혈1 h재관주1 h조),Ⅲ조(담도결혈1 h재관주2 h조).대간문부담관、담총관근단급소협간담관적상피세포행조망(TUNEL법)검측、병리형태학평분화초미결구적정량분석.결과 Ⅱ조적세포조망급병리형태평분재담총관근단여소협간담관무통계학차이(P>0.05),단간문부손상교중(P<0.05);선립체평균체적(V)급미융모면적밀도(AMv)비교재간문부최중,담총관근단최경(P<0.05).재Ⅲ조이상각지표도표현위간문부최중,소협간담관차지,담총관근단최경(P<0.05).결론 담관상피세포적이질성이급주위혈관총불동부위구축형식적불동도치료담도계통각부위손상정도적차이.해결과위해석간문부담관협착고발솔적림상표현제공료일정적실험기출.담총관근단손상최경저일결과제시,재림상간이식중,응진량이담총관근단작위최가문합부위.
Objective To comparatively study the ischemia-reperfusion injuries caused by heterogeneity of different positions of the biliary system and different construction patterns of the peribiliary vascular plexus. Methods Thirty rats were randomly divided into 3 groups: Group Ⅰ , sham operated; Group Ⅱ , 1h ischemia in biliary tract followed by 1h reperfusion; Group Ⅲ, 1h ischemia in biliary tract followed by 2h reperfusion. TUNEL assay, pathomorphology score determination and ultrastructural quantitative analysis were performed on epithelium of the hilar bile duct, proximal common bile duct and interlobular bile duct. Results In groupⅡ , TUNEL assay and pathomorphology score showed no statistical difference between proximal common bile duct and interlobular bile duct (P>0.05) but showed significant differences in the hilar bile duct(P<0.05). Mean volume (V) of mitochondria and area density of microvilli were obviously serious in the hilar bile duct but obviously slight in the proximal common bile duct(P<0. 05). In group Ⅲ, the results of the above detections showed that the most severe was in hilar bile duct, followed by the interlobular bile duct and proximal common bile duct(P<0. 05). Conclusion Different injuries in various parts of the biliary system are caused by heterogeneity of biliary epithelial cells and construction patterns of the peribiliary vascular plexus. It also provides the experimental basis to explain the higher incidences of hilar bile duct stricture. It could be taken as the best position when the bile duct is anastomosed.