酿酒科技
釀酒科技
양주과기
LIQUOR-MAKING SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
2012年
1期
51-53,57
,共4页
熊小毛%杨团员%张明春%罗江承%徐志平%李一川%马向东
熊小毛%楊糰員%張明春%囉江承%徐誌平%李一川%馬嚮東
웅소모%양단원%장명춘%라강승%서지평%리일천%마향동
微生物%白酒%白云边酒%堆积发酵产物%生理活性%酒质
微生物%白酒%白雲邊酒%堆積髮酵產物%生理活性%酒質
미생물%백주%백운변주%퇴적발효산물%생리활성%주질
microbes%liquor%Baiyunbian liquor%fermented products by stacking fermentation%physiological activity%liquor quality
采用不同培养基、不同基质对白云边酒厂堆积发酵过程中微生物的生理活性进行了研究,同时对白云边酒厂5个不同的堆积产物进行了生理活性的比较研究。结果表明,只有YPD培养基能够显示出微生物的生理活性;在YPD培养基中加入淀粉、蔗糖、葡萄糖,能影响所培养微生物的生理活性,其中,葡萄糖的影响力最强,蔗糖次之,淀粉最弱;白云边酒厂5个不同的堆积产物的生理活性存在差异,1号和2号样生理活性强,产气上升快,3号、4号和5号样产气上升慢,结合最后发酵产酒的质量对比发现,产气上升快的所产质优于产气慢的。
採用不同培養基、不同基質對白雲邊酒廠堆積髮酵過程中微生物的生理活性進行瞭研究,同時對白雲邊酒廠5箇不同的堆積產物進行瞭生理活性的比較研究。結果錶明,隻有YPD培養基能夠顯示齣微生物的生理活性;在YPD培養基中加入澱粉、蔗糖、葡萄糖,能影響所培養微生物的生理活性,其中,葡萄糖的影響力最彊,蔗糖次之,澱粉最弱;白雲邊酒廠5箇不同的堆積產物的生理活性存在差異,1號和2號樣生理活性彊,產氣上升快,3號、4號和5號樣產氣上升慢,結閤最後髮酵產酒的質量對比髮現,產氣上升快的所產質優于產氣慢的。
채용불동배양기、불동기질대백운변주엄퇴적발효과정중미생물적생리활성진행료연구,동시대백운변주엄5개불동적퇴적산물진행료생리활성적비교연구。결과표명,지유YPD배양기능구현시출미생물적생리활성;재YPD배양기중가입정분、자당、포도당,능영향소배양미생물적생리활성,기중,포도당적영향력최강,자당차지,정분최약;백운변주엄5개불동적퇴적산물적생리활성존재차이,1호화2호양생리활성강,산기상승쾌,3호、4호화5호양산기상승만,결합최후발효산주적질량대비발현,산기상승쾌적소산질우우산기만적。
The physiological activity of microbes in stacking fermentation process in Baiyunbian Distillery was studied by use of different culture mediums and different substrate. Meanwhile, the physiological activities of five different fermented products by stacking fermentation in Baiyunbian Distillery were analyzed and compared. The results showed that the physiological activity of microbes could be detected only with YPD culture medium (yeast extract peptone dextrose medium), the addition of starch, sucrose and glucose in YPD culture medium would influence the physiological activity of the cultured microbes (glucose had the strongest influence, then followed by sucrose and starch), there was some difference in physiological activities among the five different fermented products (No.1 and No.2 fermented products had stronger physiological activities and No.3, No.4 and No.5 fermented products had weaker physiological activities), furthermore, the quality of the produced liquor by No. 1 and No.2 fermented products was also better than that by No.3, No.4 and No.5 fermented products.