检验医学
檢驗醫學
검험의학
LABORATORY MEDICINE
2010年
3期
179-181
,共3页
不规则抗体%微柱凝胶%聚凝胺%敏感性%重复性
不規則抗體%微柱凝膠%聚凝胺%敏感性%重複性
불규칙항체%미주응효%취응알%민감성%중복성
Irregular antibody%Microcolumn gel%Polybrene%Sensitivity%Reproducibility
目的 比较微柱凝集和聚凝胺法的灵敏度和重复性,为不规则抗体的检测更新方法.方法 使用微柱凝集和聚凝胺法检测不规则抗体,对比观察2种方法检出的阴、阳性结果和重复检验的准确性,从而选择灵敏度高和重复性好的方法满足临床输血需要.结果 从18 000例住院患者中用微柱凝集筛选出不规则抗体阳性19例,阳性率为0.105%,其中D抗体7例,E抗体5例,C抗体3例,Ec抗体3例,Ce抗体1例;用聚凝胺法检测不规则抗体,仅有阳性为2例,阳性率为0.011%,2种方法比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);重复性检验:微柱凝集(19/19)和聚凝胺(2/2)均为100%,2种方法差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 用微柱凝集检测不规则抗体能显著提高抗体的检出率,可避免漏检而降低输血反应的发生率.
目的 比較微柱凝集和聚凝胺法的靈敏度和重複性,為不規則抗體的檢測更新方法.方法 使用微柱凝集和聚凝胺法檢測不規則抗體,對比觀察2種方法檢齣的陰、暘性結果和重複檢驗的準確性,從而選擇靈敏度高和重複性好的方法滿足臨床輸血需要.結果 從18 000例住院患者中用微柱凝集篩選齣不規則抗體暘性19例,暘性率為0.105%,其中D抗體7例,E抗體5例,C抗體3例,Ec抗體3例,Ce抗體1例;用聚凝胺法檢測不規則抗體,僅有暘性為2例,暘性率為0.011%,2種方法比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);重複性檢驗:微柱凝集(19/19)和聚凝胺(2/2)均為100%,2種方法差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 用微柱凝集檢測不規則抗體能顯著提高抗體的檢齣率,可避免漏檢而降低輸血反應的髮生率.
목적 비교미주응집화취응알법적령민도화중복성,위불규칙항체적검측경신방법.방법 사용미주응집화취응알법검측불규칙항체,대비관찰2충방법검출적음、양성결과화중복검험적준학성,종이선택령민도고화중복성호적방법만족림상수혈수요.결과 종18 000례주원환자중용미주응집사선출불규칙항체양성19례,양성솔위0.105%,기중D항체7례,E항체5례,C항체3례,Ec항체3례,Ce항체1례;용취응알법검측불규칙항체,부유양성위2례,양성솔위0.011%,2충방법비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);중복성검험:미주응집(19/19)화취응알(2/2)균위100%,2충방법차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 용미주응집검측불규칙항체능현저제고항체적검출솔,가피면루검이강저수혈반응적발생솔.
Objective To compare the sensitivity and reproducibility of microcolumn gel test and polybrene test in irregular antibody detection and find a new method. Methods Microcolumn gel test and polybrene test were used for detecting irregular antibody, and the positive and negative results were compared and analyzed. The accuracy of repeated detection was also analyzed. The method, which was sensitive and had good reproducibility, would be applied into clinical blood transfusion. Results 19 irregular antibody positive cases were screened by microcolumn gel test among 18 000 inpatient cases, and the positive rate was 0.105%. 7 cases of them were Rh(D), 5 cases were Rh(E), 3 cases were Rh(C) , 3 cases were Rh(Ec) and 1case was Rh(Ce). However, only 2 irregular antibody positive cases were screened by polybrene test, and the positive rate was 0.011%. There were significant difference between two methods (P<0.05). Two methods both had complete reproducibility. Conclusions Microcolumn gel test can significantly increase the detection rate and decrease the false negative results of testing, which can be helpful to reduce the incidence of transfusion reaction.