中华航空航天医学杂志
中華航空航天醫學雜誌
중화항공항천의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE MEDICINE
2008年
1期
42-47,封3
,共7页
刘英丽%JIN Zhen%刘刚%李科%曾亚伟%朱磊%刘兆敏%郭春彦%刘玉盛
劉英麗%JIN Zhen%劉剛%李科%曾亞偉%硃磊%劉兆敏%郭春彥%劉玉盛
류영려%JIN Zhen%류강%리과%증아위%주뢰%류조민%곽춘언%류옥성
核磁共振%模拟失重%记忆%脑
覈磁共振%模擬失重%記憶%腦
핵자공진%모의실중%기억%뇌
Nuclear magnetic resonance%Weightlessness simulation%Memory%Brain
目的 采用功能性磁共振技术研究微重力环境对工作记忆的影响. 方法 9名健康男性青年头低位卧床4周.卧床前、卧床1周时和卧床4周后各对其进行1次倒数2项工作记忆任务的功能磁共振成像扫描. 结果 模拟失重前,工作记忆任务激活的脑区有双侧额叶(BA46/9、47、6)、前扣带回(BA32)、双侧顶叶(BA7)、双侧枕叶(19/18)和左侧丘脑.模拟失重1周时,激活脑区的范围和信号强度变化显著.模拟失重4周后,激活脑区与卧床前趋于相似. 结论 ①模拟失重状态时,人脑工作记忆功能状态有明显的变化,主要表现为功能脑区激活范围和部位的变化;②模拟失重环境对工作记忆信息的被动贮存影响不大,但对信息的主动复述维持及中央执行系统的信息操作功能有明显、可逆的影响;③失重1周时,人脑激活区变化显著.失重4周时,人脑已经开始逐步适应,但未正常化.
目的 採用功能性磁共振技術研究微重力環境對工作記憶的影響. 方法 9名健康男性青年頭低位臥床4週.臥床前、臥床1週時和臥床4週後各對其進行1次倒數2項工作記憶任務的功能磁共振成像掃描. 結果 模擬失重前,工作記憶任務激活的腦區有雙側額葉(BA46/9、47、6)、前釦帶迴(BA32)、雙側頂葉(BA7)、雙側枕葉(19/18)和左側丘腦.模擬失重1週時,激活腦區的範圍和信號彊度變化顯著.模擬失重4週後,激活腦區與臥床前趨于相似. 結論 ①模擬失重狀態時,人腦工作記憶功能狀態有明顯的變化,主要錶現為功能腦區激活範圍和部位的變化;②模擬失重環境對工作記憶信息的被動貯存影響不大,但對信息的主動複述維持及中央執行繫統的信息操作功能有明顯、可逆的影響;③失重1週時,人腦激活區變化顯著.失重4週時,人腦已經開始逐步適應,但未正常化.
목적 채용공능성자공진기술연구미중력배경대공작기억적영향. 방법 9명건강남성청년두저위와상4주.와상전、와상1주시화와상4주후각대기진행1차도수2항공작기억임무적공능자공진성상소묘. 결과 모의실중전,공작기억임무격활적뇌구유쌍측액협(BA46/9、47、6)、전구대회(BA32)、쌍측정협(BA7)、쌍측침협(19/18)화좌측구뇌.모의실중1주시,격활뇌구적범위화신호강도변화현저.모의실중4주후,격활뇌구여와상전추우상사. 결론 ①모의실중상태시,인뇌공작기억공능상태유명현적변화,주요표현위공능뇌구격활범위화부위적변화;②모의실중배경대공작기억신식적피동저존영향불대,단대신식적주동복술유지급중앙집행계통적신식조작공능유명현、가역적영향;③실중1주시,인뇌격활구변화현저.실중4주시,인뇌이경개시축보괄응,단미정상화.
Objective To investigate the effect of simulated weightlessness on human working memory by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Methods Nine young male volunteers underwent - 6° head-down bed rest (HDBR) for four weeks. Series fMRI scans were performed on them one day before experiment, one week and four weeks after HDBR with block designed 2-back working memory task. Results The engagement of working memory before HDBR produced significant activation in the prefrontal cortex (bi-lateralized BA46/9, left> right; bi- lateralized BA47; right BA6), anterior cingulated gyrus(BA32), bi-lateralized posterior parietal lobe (BAT,left>right), bi-lateralized occipital lobe (BA19/18) and left thalamus. Compared with those before HDBR, the engagement of working memory one week after HDBR brain activation size and signal magnitude changed significantly. However, compared with those before HDBR, there was unsignificant change four weeks after HDBR. Conclusions ①The brain activation size and location of working memory would change after HDBR. ②HDBR may change the active maintenance and manipulation of information but not the passive storage of information of human brain. ③And the change can be very salient one week after HDBR. However, human brain may adapt to HDBR after four weeks.