CAJ | 학술논문

目的回顾分析国内肺炎系统评价和Meta分析的一般情况和质量.方法对CNKI、维普、万方、CBM数据库进行检索,搜集发表在国内中文期刊有关肺炎的系统评价和Meta分析文献,由2名调查员独立盲态提取文献的一般信息、Cochrane系统评价(CSR)格式和Meta分析报告质量(QUOROM)声明所要求条目信息后进行分析.结果共纳入11篇文献,其中4篇为系统评价,7篇为Meta分析.共分析了326个研究,分布于国内30个行政区和国外7个国家,研究对象为17 971人.文献格式均未采用CSR格式或QUOROM声明.在CSR格式4大项40个条目中,分别有25、2、1、5、7个条目在4、3、2、1、0篇文献中有对应信息,整体条目信息出现比例为70.6%(113/160).在QUOROM声明6大项18个小项中,分别有10、2、2、2、1、1项在7、5、4、2、1、0篇文献中有对应信息,整体小项信息出现比例为73.8%(93/126);48个条目中,分别有10、2、1、3、5、7、6、14个条目在7、6、5、4、3、2、1、0篇文献中有对应信息,整体条目信息出现比例为39.9%(134/336).结论国内肺炎系统评价和Meta分析研究起步晚,研究数量和对象较少,财政投入薄弱.文献质量尚可,但在选择标准、文献检索、真实性评价、评价方法、研究特征等方面还存在不足,应加强人员培训.
목적 회고분석국내폐염계통평개화Meta분석적일반정황화질량.방법 대CNKI、유보、만방、CBM수거고진행검색,수집발표재국내중문기간유관폐염적계통평개화Meta분석문헌,유2명조사원독립맹태제취문헌적일반신식、Cochrane계통평개(CSR)격식화Meta분석보고질량(QUOROM)성명소요구조목신식후진행분석.결과 공납입11편문헌,기중4편위계통평개,7편위Meta분석.공분석료326개연구,분포우국내30개행정구화국외7개국가,연구대상위17 971인.문헌격식균미채용CSR격식혹QUOROM성명.재CSR격식4대항40개조목중,분별유25、2、1、5、7개조목재4、3、2、1、0편문헌중유대응신식,정체조목신식출현비례위70.6%(113/160).재QUOROM성명6대항18개소항중,분별유10、2、2、2、1、1항재7、5、4、2、1、0편문헌중유대응신식,정체소항신식출현비례위73.8%(93/126);48개조목중,분별유10、2、1、3、5、7、6、14개조목재7、6、5、4、3、2、1、0편문헌중유대응신식,정체조목신식출현비례위39.9%(134/336).결론 국내폐염계통평개화Meta분석연구기보만,연구수량화대상교소,재정투입박약.문헌질량상가,단재선택표준、문헌검색、진실성평개、평개방법、연구특정등방면환존재불족,응가강인원배훈.
Objective To review and analyze the prevailing information and quality of published systematic reviews and Meta-analysis of pneumonia in China. Methods After a CNKI, VIP, Wanfang and CMB database retrieval of systematic reviews and Meta-analysis of pneumonia published in Chinese journals, two reviewers, blinded to author (s), et al, independently collected and analyzed the common information and quality, using the form of Cochrane systematic reviews (CSR) and the quality of reporting of Meta-analysis (QUOROM) statement. Results Eleven papers, of which 4 were systematic reviews, 7 Meta-analysis were identified. Three hundred and twenty-six studies were analyzed with involvement of 17 971 individuals distributed in 30 domestic administrative regions and 7 foreign countries. None of these articles used the form of CSR or the QUOROM statement to report their results. In all 4 domains and 40 items of the form of CSR, 4 articles addressed 25 items, 3 addressed 2, 2 addressed 1, 1 addressed 5, 0 addressed 7, and the overall proportion for correspondent item information presented was 70.6% (113/160). In all 6 domains and 18 minor terms of the QUOROM statement, 7 articles addressed 10 items, 5 addressed 2, 4 addressed 2, 2 addressed 2, 1 addressed 1, 0 addressed 1, and the overall proportion for correspondent minor terms information presented was 73. 8% (93/126). In all 48 checklist items, 7 articles addressed 10 items, 6 addressed 2, 5 addressed 1, 4 addressed 3, 3 addressed 5, 2 addressed 7, 1 addressed 6, 0 addressed 14, and the overall proportion for correspondent item information presented was 39. 9% (134/336). Conclusion These studies of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses of pneumonia in China starts late, only a few of researchers and participants join in the project, and the financial support is insufficient. The quality of literature is passable, but it is weak in some areas such as data sources, selection searching, validity assessment, review methods, study characteristics, etc. The authors suggest that advanced methodological training is necessary for reviewers and stronger financial support is needed.