重庆医科大学学报
重慶醫科大學學報
중경의과대학학보
UNIVERSITATIS SCIENTIAE MEDICINAE CHONGQING
2009年
11期
1591-1593
,共3页
黄德胜%钱学华%黄柏南%张水林%宋卫香
黃德勝%錢學華%黃柏南%張水林%宋衛香
황덕성%전학화%황백남%장수림%송위향
体外冲击波碎石术%输尿管结石%治愈率%中药
體外遲擊波碎石術%輸尿管結石%治愈率%中藥
체외충격파쇄석술%수뇨관결석%치유솔%중약
Extraeorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy%Ureteral calculus%Curative rate%Traditional Chinese medicine
目的:探讨体外冲击波碎石术(Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy,ESWL)联合中药治疗输尿管结石的疗效及安全性.方法:305例输尿管结石患者随机分成中药组(A组)、ESWL组(B组)和ESWL+中药组(C组),3组治疗前均常规应用西药,观察3组分别在第1、2、3、4疗程后的结石治愈率、有效率、排石时间、不良反应.结果:C组治愈率、有效率高于B组和A组,C组排石时间短于B组和A组,B组的不良反应高于C组和A组,3组结果差别有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:ESWL联合中药治疗输尿管结石可提高结石的疗效、减少ESWL后的并发症,总体安全有效,值得在临床中推广.
目的:探討體外遲擊波碎石術(Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy,ESWL)聯閤中藥治療輸尿管結石的療效及安全性.方法:305例輸尿管結石患者隨機分成中藥組(A組)、ESWL組(B組)和ESWL+中藥組(C組),3組治療前均常規應用西藥,觀察3組分彆在第1、2、3、4療程後的結石治愈率、有效率、排石時間、不良反應.結果:C組治愈率、有效率高于B組和A組,C組排石時間短于B組和A組,B組的不良反應高于C組和A組,3組結果差彆有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論:ESWL聯閤中藥治療輸尿管結石可提高結石的療效、減少ESWL後的併髮癥,總體安全有效,值得在臨床中推廣.
목적:탐토체외충격파쇄석술(Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy,ESWL)연합중약치료수뇨관결석적료효급안전성.방법:305례수뇨관결석환자수궤분성중약조(A조)、ESWL조(B조)화ESWL+중약조(C조),3조치료전균상규응용서약,관찰3조분별재제1、2、3、4료정후적결석치유솔、유효솔、배석시간、불량반응.결과:C조치유솔、유효솔고우B조화A조,C조배석시간단우B조화A조,B조적불량반응고우C조화A조,3조결과차별유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론:ESWL연합중약치료수뇨관결석가제고결석적료효、감소ESWL후적병발증,총체안전유효,치득재림상중추엄.
Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) combined with traditional Chinese medicine for patients with ureteral calculus. Methods: A total of 305 patients were randomly divided into three groups: group A (65 cases)treated with traditional Chinese medicine; group B (120 cases)treated with ESWL; and group C (120 cases) treated with ESWL plus traditional Chinese medicine. All three group were treated with western medicine before the research. Ten days as a course, the curative rate, the total of effective rate, discharge time of stone and the side effects of each group were analyzed constantly for 4 courses. Results: After treatment for 4 courses, the curative rate and the total of effective rate in group C were 90.8%and 98.3% , respectively, being obviously higher than those in group B (80.8%, 89.2% )and group A (12.3%,40%), the discharge time of stone in group C was shorter than that of the group B and that of group A, and the side effects in group C and group A were lower than those in group B (P<0.05). Conclusion: ESWL combined with traditional Chinese medicine for patients with ureteral calculus can improve the efficacy, shorten the course of treatment and decrease the complications after ESWL. This method is generally safe and effective, worth wide application in clinic.