国际免疫学杂志
國際免疫學雜誌
국제면역학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
2009年
2期
167-168
,共2页
尿蛋白%磺基硫酸比浊定量法%干式化学定量法
尿蛋白%磺基硫痠比濁定量法%榦式化學定量法
뇨단백%광기류산비탁정량법%간식화학정량법
Proteinuria%Sulfosalicylic sulfate turbidity quantitative method%Slide chemical quantitative method
目的 通过24 h尿蛋白标本的争检测,比较磺基硫酸比浊定量法和干式化学定量法在尿蛋白定量检测中的差别.方法 我院随机门诊、住院病人48例24 h尿液标本,按说明书要求,经两种方法分别进行标本检测,测定24 h尿蛋白数值.结果 磺基硫酸比浊定量法和干式化学定量法在24 h尿蛋白标本的检测中存在差异(t=5.756,P<0.05).结论 磺基硫酸比浊定量法已不适宜用于临床尿蛋白定量检测.
目的 通過24 h尿蛋白標本的爭檢測,比較磺基硫痠比濁定量法和榦式化學定量法在尿蛋白定量檢測中的差彆.方法 我院隨機門診、住院病人48例24 h尿液標本,按說明書要求,經兩種方法分彆進行標本檢測,測定24 h尿蛋白數值.結果 磺基硫痠比濁定量法和榦式化學定量法在24 h尿蛋白標本的檢測中存在差異(t=5.756,P<0.05).結論 磺基硫痠比濁定量法已不適宜用于臨床尿蛋白定量檢測.
목적 통과24 h뇨단백표본적쟁검측,비교광기류산비탁정량법화간식화학정량법재뇨단백정량검측중적차별.방법 아원수궤문진、주원병인48례24 h뇨액표본,안설명서요구,경량충방법분별진행표본검측,측정24 h뇨단백수치.결과 광기류산비탁정량법화간식화학정량법재24 h뇨단백표본적검측중존재차이(t=5.756,P<0.05).결론 광기류산비탁정량법이불괄의용우림상뇨단백정량검측.
Objective To compare the sulfosalJcylic sulfate turbidity and slide chemical quantitative method for detection of the protein concentration in 24-hour urine samples. Methods To measure the protein concen-tration in 24-hour urine samples respectively with two kinds of method according to their instructions for random 48 cases of outpatients and inpatients. Results sulfosalicylic sulfate turbidity was significantly different from slide chemical quantitative method for detection of the protein concentration in 24-hour urine specimens. Con-clusion sulfosalicylic stdfate turbidity quantitative method is not suitable for measuring protein concentration in urine.
