中国危重病急救医学
中國危重病急救醫學
중국위중병급구의학
CHINESE CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
2010年
6期
375-378
,共4页
黄焕亮%吴沃栋%许耘红%蔡玉宇%张华%梁国华%黎萍%梁伟翔%陈之祥
黃煥亮%吳沃棟%許耘紅%蔡玉宇%張華%樑國華%黎萍%樑偉翔%陳之祥
황환량%오옥동%허운홍%채옥우%장화%량국화%려평%량위상%진지상
内皮祖细胞%CD34+%颈动脉中层厚度%原发性高血压%动脉粥样硬化
內皮祖細胞%CD34+%頸動脈中層厚度%原髮性高血壓%動脈粥樣硬化
내피조세포%CD34+%경동맥중층후도%원발성고혈압%동맥죽양경화
Endothelial progenitor ceil%CD34+%Carotid artery intima-madia thickness%Essential hypertension%Atherosclerosis
目的 探讨中青年原发性高血压患者循环内皮祖细胞(EPCs)CD34+水平与颈动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)和Framingham心血管危险因素积分标准(FRFC)的相关性及其评估高血压患者早期血管病变的价值.方法选择62例年龄25~45岁原发性高血压患者(高血压组)及20例健康体检者(健康对照组).高血压组患者采用FRFC分层方法分为低危组18例,中危组14例,高危组17例,极高危组13例.测定各组的外周循环EPCs CD34+水平及颈动脉IMT,并对EPCs CD34+水平与FRFC积分及颈动脉IMT进行相关性分析.结果 高血压各亚组患者外周循环EPCs CD34+水平随心血管危险程度的增加逐步下降[低危组(0.12±0.02)%,中危组(0.07±0.03)%,高危组(0.04±0.03)%,极高危组(0.01±0.01)%],各组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01),且均明显低于健康对照组[(0.15±0.03)%,均P<0.01];颈动脉IMT随心血管危险程度增加明显增厚[低危组(0.80±0.07)mm,中危组(1.11±0.08)mm,高危组(1.26±0.10)mm,极高危组(1.45±0.09)mm],各组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01),且与健康对照组[(0.73±0.08)mm]比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.01).高血压患者外周循环EPCs CD34+水平与FRFC积分呈负相关(r=-0.875,P<0.01),与颈动脉IMT呈负相关(r=-0.852,P<0.01).结论 中青年原发性高血压患者循环EPCs CD34+水平与心血管危险因素及颈动脉IMT呈负相关;外周循环EPCs CD34+水平可以作为评估高血压患者早期血管病变的标志之一.
目的 探討中青年原髮性高血壓患者循環內皮祖細胞(EPCs)CD34+水平與頸動脈內膜中層厚度(IMT)和Framingham心血管危險因素積分標準(FRFC)的相關性及其評估高血壓患者早期血管病變的價值.方法選擇62例年齡25~45歲原髮性高血壓患者(高血壓組)及20例健康體檢者(健康對照組).高血壓組患者採用FRFC分層方法分為低危組18例,中危組14例,高危組17例,極高危組13例.測定各組的外週循環EPCs CD34+水平及頸動脈IMT,併對EPCs CD34+水平與FRFC積分及頸動脈IMT進行相關性分析.結果 高血壓各亞組患者外週循環EPCs CD34+水平隨心血管危險程度的增加逐步下降[低危組(0.12±0.02)%,中危組(0.07±0.03)%,高危組(0.04±0.03)%,極高危組(0.01±0.01)%],各組間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05或P<0.01),且均明顯低于健康對照組[(0.15±0.03)%,均P<0.01];頸動脈IMT隨心血管危險程度增加明顯增厚[低危組(0.80±0.07)mm,中危組(1.11±0.08)mm,高危組(1.26±0.10)mm,極高危組(1.45±0.09)mm],各組間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05或P<0.01),且與健康對照組[(0.73±0.08)mm]比較差異有統計學意義(均P<0.01).高血壓患者外週循環EPCs CD34+水平與FRFC積分呈負相關(r=-0.875,P<0.01),與頸動脈IMT呈負相關(r=-0.852,P<0.01).結論 中青年原髮性高血壓患者循環EPCs CD34+水平與心血管危險因素及頸動脈IMT呈負相關;外週循環EPCs CD34+水平可以作為評估高血壓患者早期血管病變的標誌之一.
목적 탐토중청년원발성고혈압환자순배내피조세포(EPCs)CD34+수평여경동맥내막중층후도(IMT)화Framingham심혈관위험인소적분표준(FRFC)적상관성급기평고고혈압환자조기혈관병변적개치.방법선택62례년령25~45세원발성고혈압환자(고혈압조)급20례건강체검자(건강대조조).고혈압조환자채용FRFC분층방법분위저위조18례,중위조14례,고위조17례,겁고위조13례.측정각조적외주순배EPCs CD34+수평급경동맥IMT,병대EPCs CD34+수평여FRFC적분급경동맥IMT진행상관성분석.결과 고혈압각아조환자외주순배EPCs CD34+수평수심혈관위험정도적증가축보하강[저위조(0.12±0.02)%,중위조(0.07±0.03)%,고위조(0.04±0.03)%,겁고위조(0.01±0.01)%],각조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05혹P<0.01),차균명현저우건강대조조[(0.15±0.03)%,균P<0.01];경동맥IMT수심혈관위험정도증가명현증후[저위조(0.80±0.07)mm,중위조(1.11±0.08)mm,고위조(1.26±0.10)mm,겁고위조(1.45±0.09)mm],각조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05혹P<0.01),차여건강대조조[(0.73±0.08)mm]비교차이유통계학의의(균P<0.01).고혈압환자외주순배EPCs CD34+수평여FRFC적분정부상관(r=-0.875,P<0.01),여경동맥IMT정부상관(r=-0.852,P<0.01).결론 중청년원발성고혈압환자순배EPCs CD34+수평여심혈관위험인소급경동맥IMT정부상관;외주순배EPCs CD34+수평가이작위평고고혈압환자조기혈관병변적표지지일.
Objective To explore the relationship between the level of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) CD34+with the Framingham cardiovascular risk factors, or with the carotid artery intima-madia thickness (IMT), and to evaluate the value of circulating EPCs CD34+level as a cytologicalmarker of early vascular lesion in youth and middle aged essential hypertension (EH) patients.Methods A total of 62 patients with EH aged between 25 to 45 were enrolled as study group and 20 healthy people were enrolled as control group.EH patients were stratified with cardiovascular risk factors according to Framingham risk factors score into low-risk group with 18 cases, mid-risk group with 14 cases, high-risk group with 17 cases, and extremely high-risk group with 13 cases.The level of circulating EPCs CD34+,carotid artery IMT were respectively measured.The relationship between the level of circulating EPCsCD34+ and Framingham cardiovascular risk factors score, carotid artery IMT was analyzed.Results The level of circulating EPCs CD34+ was gradually decreased with an increase of the Framingham risk factors score in each hypertensive subgroup [low-risk group:(0.12±0.02)%, mid-risk group:(0.07±0.03)%,high-risk group:(0.04±0.03)%, extremely high-risk group:(0.01±0.01)%], and they were significantly lower than that in control group [(0.15±0.03)%], and there was a significant difference among hypertensive subgroups (P<0.05 or P<0.01).Carotid artery IMT was significantly thicker among hypertensive subgroups [low-risk group:(0.80±0.07)mm, mid-risk group:(1.11±0.08)mm, high-risk group: (1.26±0.10)mm, extremely high-risk group:(1.45±0.09)mm], and there was a significant difference between each hypertensive group and that of control group [(0.73±0.08)mm, all P<0.01].There was also statistical significance among hypertensive subgroups(P<0.05 or P<0.01).There was a negative correlation between the level of circulating EPCs CD34+and Framingham risk factors score (r=-0.875, P<0.01), and also a negative correlation with carotid artery IMT (r=-0.852, P<0.01).Conclusion There was a significant correlation between the level of circulating EPCs CD34+with Framingham risk factors score and also carotid artery IMT in EH patients.Circulating EPCs CD34+could be a cytological marker of early vascular lesion in hypertension patients.