中华放射学杂志
中華放射學雜誌
중화방사학잡지
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2012年
3期
244-247
,共4页
彭鹏%黄仲奎%龙莉玲%龙梅%赵凡玉%李春燕%李文美
彭鵬%黃仲奎%龍莉玲%龍梅%趙凡玉%李春燕%李文美
팽붕%황중규%룡리령%룡매%조범옥%리춘연%리문미
地中海贫血%磁共振成像%对比分析
地中海貧血%磁共振成像%對比分析
지중해빈혈%자공진성상%대비분석
Thalassemia%Magnetic resonance imaging%Comparative study
目的 定量评价地中海贫血患者心脏、肝脏铁沉积程度,探讨两者关系及临床用肝铁浓度> 15 mg/g干重预测心铁沉积的准确性.方法 连续搜集2010年9月至2011年6月期间103例5岁以上总输血(全血)剂量>10 U(1 U=200 ml)地中海贫血患者资料,行心脏、肝脏MR检查并测量T2*值,采用Spearman秩相关分析其相关性.以肝脏T2*<0.96 ms(相当于肝铁浓度>15 mg/g干重)为标准,将患者分为两组,采用秩和检验比较各组心肌T2*值的差异.以心脏T2*<10 ms、10 ms≤T2*<20 ms和T2*≥20 ms为标准,将患者分为3组并采用秩和检验比较各组肝脏T2*值有无差异.绘制用肝铁浓度> 15 mg/g干重预测患者心脏铁沉积的ROC曲线.结果 103例地中海贫血患者的心脏T2*值中位数为24.00ms(4.70~51.10 ms),肝脏T2*值中位数为1.16 ms(0.68~14.80 ms),两者呈低度相关(r=0.453,P=0.000),且未见规律性.肝脏T2*<0.96 ms组25例患者的心脏T2*值中位数为12.10 ms(4.70~41.70 ms),T2*≥0.96 ms组78例患者的心脏T2*值中位数为26.10 ms(4.80~51.10 ms),两组之间差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.566,P=0.000).心脏T2*<10 ms组20例患者的肝脏T2*值中位数为1.06ms(0.68 ~3.83 ms),T2*≥20 ms组58例患者中位数为1.76 ms(0.74~14.80 ms),差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.553,P=0.000);10 ms≤T2*<20 ms组25例患者的肝脏T2*值中位数为0.99 ms(0.69 ~ 13.59 ms),与T2*>20 ms组间差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.951,P=0.000);心脏T2*<10 ms组与10 ms≤T2*<20 ms组相比,两组患者的肝脏T2*值之间差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.046,P=0.964).以肝铁浓度>15 mg/g干重预测心脏铁沉积的ROC曲线下面积为0.771,敏感度为42.2%,特异度为89.7%.结论 多次输血地中海贫血患者的心、肝铁水平之间呈低度相关.肝铁浓度> 15 mg/g干重的患者心铁沉积发生率相对较高,用其预测心脏铁沉积的准确度为中等偏低.
目的 定量評價地中海貧血患者心髒、肝髒鐵沉積程度,探討兩者關繫及臨床用肝鐵濃度> 15 mg/g榦重預測心鐵沉積的準確性.方法 連續搜集2010年9月至2011年6月期間103例5歲以上總輸血(全血)劑量>10 U(1 U=200 ml)地中海貧血患者資料,行心髒、肝髒MR檢查併測量T2*值,採用Spearman秩相關分析其相關性.以肝髒T2*<0.96 ms(相噹于肝鐵濃度>15 mg/g榦重)為標準,將患者分為兩組,採用秩和檢驗比較各組心肌T2*值的差異.以心髒T2*<10 ms、10 ms≤T2*<20 ms和T2*≥20 ms為標準,將患者分為3組併採用秩和檢驗比較各組肝髒T2*值有無差異.繪製用肝鐵濃度> 15 mg/g榦重預測患者心髒鐵沉積的ROC麯線.結果 103例地中海貧血患者的心髒T2*值中位數為24.00ms(4.70~51.10 ms),肝髒T2*值中位數為1.16 ms(0.68~14.80 ms),兩者呈低度相關(r=0.453,P=0.000),且未見規律性.肝髒T2*<0.96 ms組25例患者的心髒T2*值中位數為12.10 ms(4.70~41.70 ms),T2*≥0.96 ms組78例患者的心髒T2*值中位數為26.10 ms(4.80~51.10 ms),兩組之間差異有統計學意義(Z=-3.566,P=0.000).心髒T2*<10 ms組20例患者的肝髒T2*值中位數為1.06ms(0.68 ~3.83 ms),T2*≥20 ms組58例患者中位數為1.76 ms(0.74~14.80 ms),差異有統計學意義(Z=-3.553,P=0.000);10 ms≤T2*<20 ms組25例患者的肝髒T2*值中位數為0.99 ms(0.69 ~ 13.59 ms),與T2*>20 ms組間差異有統計學意義(Z=-3.951,P=0.000);心髒T2*<10 ms組與10 ms≤T2*<20 ms組相比,兩組患者的肝髒T2*值之間差異無統計學意義(Z=-0.046,P=0.964).以肝鐵濃度>15 mg/g榦重預測心髒鐵沉積的ROC麯線下麵積為0.771,敏感度為42.2%,特異度為89.7%.結論 多次輸血地中海貧血患者的心、肝鐵水平之間呈低度相關.肝鐵濃度> 15 mg/g榦重的患者心鐵沉積髮生率相對較高,用其預測心髒鐵沉積的準確度為中等偏低.
목적 정량평개지중해빈혈환자심장、간장철침적정도,탐토량자관계급림상용간철농도> 15 mg/g간중예측심철침적적준학성.방법 련속수집2010년9월지2011년6월기간103례5세이상총수혈(전혈)제량>10 U(1 U=200 ml)지중해빈혈환자자료,행심장、간장MR검사병측량T2*치,채용Spearman질상관분석기상관성.이간장T2*<0.96 ms(상당우간철농도>15 mg/g간중)위표준,장환자분위량조,채용질화검험비교각조심기T2*치적차이.이심장T2*<10 ms、10 ms≤T2*<20 ms화T2*≥20 ms위표준,장환자분위3조병채용질화검험비교각조간장T2*치유무차이.회제용간철농도> 15 mg/g간중예측환자심장철침적적ROC곡선.결과 103례지중해빈혈환자적심장T2*치중위수위24.00ms(4.70~51.10 ms),간장T2*치중위수위1.16 ms(0.68~14.80 ms),량자정저도상관(r=0.453,P=0.000),차미견규률성.간장T2*<0.96 ms조25례환자적심장T2*치중위수위12.10 ms(4.70~41.70 ms),T2*≥0.96 ms조78례환자적심장T2*치중위수위26.10 ms(4.80~51.10 ms),량조지간차이유통계학의의(Z=-3.566,P=0.000).심장T2*<10 ms조20례환자적간장T2*치중위수위1.06ms(0.68 ~3.83 ms),T2*≥20 ms조58례환자중위수위1.76 ms(0.74~14.80 ms),차이유통계학의의(Z=-3.553,P=0.000);10 ms≤T2*<20 ms조25례환자적간장T2*치중위수위0.99 ms(0.69 ~ 13.59 ms),여T2*>20 ms조간차이유통계학의의(Z=-3.951,P=0.000);심장T2*<10 ms조여10 ms≤T2*<20 ms조상비,량조환자적간장T2*치지간차이무통계학의의(Z=-0.046,P=0.964).이간철농도>15 mg/g간중예측심장철침적적ROC곡선하면적위0.771,민감도위42.2%,특이도위89.7%.결론 다차수혈지중해빈혈환자적심、간철수평지간정저도상관.간철농도> 15 mg/g간중적환자심철침적발생솔상대교고,용기예측심장철침적적준학도위중등편저.
Objective To quantify the heart and liver iron overload in thalassemia patients and discuss the relationship of iron deposition between them,and to evaluate the accuracy of using hepatic iron concentration > 15 mg/g dry tissue as an index to predict heart iron deposition as used in clinical practice.Methods One hundred and three transfusion-dependent patients with thalassemia,who were older than 5 years,underwent MRI heart and liver measurement to obtain T2 * values.The Spearman rank correlation was employed to analyze the relationship between cardiac T2 * and liver T2 * values.By using liver T2 * =0.96 ms as standard setting,patients were divided into two groups,and the differences of cardiac T2 * values between the two groups were compared by Wilcoxon rank sum test.Then by using cardiac T2 * =10,20 ms as standard setting,patients were divided into 3 groups,and the differences of liver T2 * values among the 3 groups were compared by Wilcoxon rank sum test.The ROC curves were drawn to predict the possibility of using hepatic iron concentration > 15 mg/g dry tissue as an index of cardiac iron deposition.Results The cardiac and liver T2 * values of the 103 thalassemia patients showed low correlation(r =0.453,P =0.000).With the liver T2 * value reduced,the cardiac T2* value did not decline proportionally.The cardiac T2 * value range and median of 25 patients' group whose liver T2 * < 0.96 ms were 4.70 to 41.70 ms and 12.10 ms,respectively.The cardiac T2 * value range and the median of 78 patients' group whose liver T2 * > 0.96 ms were 4.80 to 51.10 ms and 26.10 ms,respectively.There was statistically significant difference between those of the two groups(Z =-3.566,P =0.000).The liver T2 * value range and the median of 20 patients'group whose cardiac T2 * < 10 ms was 0.68 to 3.83 ms and 1.06 ms,respectively.The liver T2 * value range and the median of 58 patients' group whose cardiac T2 * ≥20 ms were 0.74 to 14.80 ms and 1.76 ms,respectively.There was statistical difference between those of the two groups(Z =-3.553,P =0.000).The liver T2 * value range and the median of 25 patients' group with cardiac 10 ms≤T2 * <20 ms were 0.69 to 13.59 ms and 0.99 ms,respectively.The values were significantly different from that of T2* ≥20 ms group(Z =-3.951,P =0.000).The liver T2 * values of cardiac T2* < 10 ms group was not statistically different from that of 10 ms≤T2* <20 ms group(Z =-0.046,P =0.964).To predict cardiac iron deposition with the index of hepatic iron concentration > 15 mg/g dry tissue,the area under the ROC curve was 0.771.The sensibility was 42.2%,the specificity was 89.7%.Conclusions There is low correlation between heart and liver iron level in thalassemia patients with long-term transfusions.Patients with hepatic iron concentration > 15 mg/g dry tissue have a higher incidence of heart iron deposition,but the accuracy of using hepatic iron concentration as an index to predict myocardial iron deposition is low to moderate.