第四纪研究
第四紀研究
제사기연구
2010年
2期
356-363
,共8页
微炭屑%点接触法%图像识别法%颗粒计数法%分粒级法%人类活动
微炭屑%點接觸法%圖像識彆法%顆粒計數法%分粒級法%人類活動
미탄설%점접촉법%도상식별법%과립계수법%분립급법%인류활동
microfossil charcoal%touch point-counts%computerized imaging technique%particle counting%size-classes%human activities
微炭屑是研究火的历史和过去人类活动、重建古生态的一项重要指标.它一般指长轴小于120μm、黑色不透明的炭化颗粒.常用点接触法(11刻点和202刻点)、图像识别法、颗粒计数法和分粒级法进行微炭屑统计.本文利用不同方法求得的微炭屑面积浓度或颗粒浓度曲线显著相关,相关系数在0.6以上(p<0.05),表明这几种方法的微炭屑统计结果具有相似的变化趋势,尤其是两种点接触法与图像识别法的统计结果更加相近,相关系数分别为0.79与0.88; 颗粒计数法与点接触法、图像识别法的相关系数是0.75和0.74.分粒级法与点接触法、图像识别法和颗粒计数法的相关性随着粒级的变化而不同.两种点接触法的微炭屑统计结果的相关系数高达0.93,反映了这两种方法所得微炭屑统计结果具有几乎相同的变化趋势.202刻点接触法由于与其他统计法的相关性都比较高,统计视域多且鉴定统计速度快,是进行微炭屑统计的最佳方法.微炭屑浓度高的时段出现在繁荣的文化期,可能指示着强烈的人类活动.
微炭屑是研究火的歷史和過去人類活動、重建古生態的一項重要指標.它一般指長軸小于120μm、黑色不透明的炭化顆粒.常用點接觸法(11刻點和202刻點)、圖像識彆法、顆粒計數法和分粒級法進行微炭屑統計.本文利用不同方法求得的微炭屑麵積濃度或顆粒濃度麯線顯著相關,相關繫數在0.6以上(p<0.05),錶明這幾種方法的微炭屑統計結果具有相似的變化趨勢,尤其是兩種點接觸法與圖像識彆法的統計結果更加相近,相關繫數分彆為0.79與0.88; 顆粒計數法與點接觸法、圖像識彆法的相關繫數是0.75和0.74.分粒級法與點接觸法、圖像識彆法和顆粒計數法的相關性隨著粒級的變化而不同.兩種點接觸法的微炭屑統計結果的相關繫數高達0.93,反映瞭這兩種方法所得微炭屑統計結果具有幾乎相同的變化趨勢.202刻點接觸法由于與其他統計法的相關性都比較高,統計視域多且鑒定統計速度快,是進行微炭屑統計的最佳方法.微炭屑濃度高的時段齣現在繁榮的文化期,可能指示著彊烈的人類活動.
미탄설시연구화적역사화과거인류활동、중건고생태적일항중요지표.타일반지장축소우120μm、흑색불투명적탄화과립.상용점접촉법(11각점화202각점)、도상식별법、과립계수법화분립급법진행미탄설통계.본문이용불동방법구득적미탄설면적농도혹과립농도곡선현저상관,상관계수재0.6이상(p<0.05),표명저궤충방법적미탄설통계결과구유상사적변화추세,우기시량충점접촉법여도상식별법적통계결과경가상근,상관계수분별위0.79여0.88; 과립계수법여점접촉법、도상식별법적상관계수시0.75화0.74.분립급법여점접촉법、도상식별법화과립계수법적상관성수착립급적변화이불동.량충점접촉법적미탄설통계결과적상관계수고체0.93,반영료저량충방법소득미탄설통계결과구유궤호상동적변화추세.202각점접촉법유우여기타통계법적상관성도비교고,통계시역다차감정통계속도쾌,시진행미탄설통계적최가방법.미탄설농도고적시단출현재번영적문화기,가능지시착강렬적인류활동.
Microfossil charcoal is one of the important proxies for exploring fire history and ancient human activity. It is generally identified as being black,opaque and angular with a size smaller than 120μm.Five different quantification methods including touch point-counts,computerized imaging technique,particle counting,size-classes are employed to estimate the microfossil charcoal concentration. A comparison study shows that the results obtained with different quantification methods are significantly correlated(F-value>0.7,p-value<0.05)and display similar trend of change. The two touch point-counts methods(11 touch point-counts and 202 touch point-counts)have a particularly high correlation coefficient(F-value 0.93).By comparison,the correlation coefficient of touch point-counts and computerized imaging technique is 0.88.The coefficients between the size-classes and other quantification methods are found to vary with the particle size of the microfossil charcoal. The 202 touch point-counts method is considered to be a better method for quantifying microfossil charcoal as it has high coefficients with other methods,smaller error and costs less counting time. The peak values of microfossil charcoal for these quantification methods are shown to coincide with the period of prosperous cultures and indicate strong human activities.